These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
3,500 average views per post against 2,205 subscribers — an engagement rate of 159.0%. Across the 1,983 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,161 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 8.83% and 31.9%, with a median of 17.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (10 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (1 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
38,554
Mature posts only
159.0% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +491. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,635–2,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 21:22
2,205
no change
5 Sept 2026, 17:16
2,205
+55
1 Sept 2026, 23:39
2,150
+42
29 Aug 2026, 16:27
2,108
+171
26 Aug 2026, 14:49
1,937
+100
23 Aug 2026, 15:16
1,837
-11
20 Aug 2026, 02:26
1,848
+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:56
1,846
+20
13 Aug 2026, 15:48
1,826
+117
11 Aug 2026, 01:45
1,709
-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:36
1,714
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
159.0%
avg views ÷ 2,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,500
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.355%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
11 (25 August 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
38,554
Reactions total
137
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
79
Videos
43
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
52s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42
30.7%
👍
39
28.5%
🔥
25
18.2%
⚡
9
6.57%
👏
8
5.84%
🤔
4
2.92%
💯
3
2.19%
🫡
3
2.19%
🙏
2
1.46%
👀
1
0.73%
😁
1
0.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сложность правильного выбора: искусство баланса в автомобильном РЭБ. 🚙⚙️
При проектировании систем РЭБ для техники мы решаем уравнение со многими переменными. Нам нужно сделать систему легче, компактнее и эффективнее. Но есть одно «НО», которое для нас не подлежит обсуждению: мы никогда не идем на компромиссы с надежностью.
Облегчить корпус, убрав «лишний» металл? Да, но только после того, как расчеты покажут, что …
«Мэт»: Ваш перехватчик теперь — в вашем кармане! 📱💥
Мы знаем, как важно, чтобы технологии были не только мощными, но и доступными. Именно поэтому мы сделали важный шаг в развитии нашего дрона-перехватчика.
«Мэт»: теперь он полностью управляется через приложение на вашем смартфоне!
Видеть цель, наводить, запускать — всё в одном интерфейсе. Наш «Мэт» видит противника, а вы управляете им прямо через экран телефона. И…
Забытые технологии возвращаются: «сеткомет» на новом витке эволюции! 🕸️🚁
Говорят, прогресс неумолим. Сеткометы ушли в прошлое, уступив место «совершенным» веревкам и новым системам. Но так ли это?
Мы тут побывали в гостях у ребят, которые знают толк в нестандартных решениях. Они показали нам свой девайс, который заставляет задуматься: простота и надежность иногда перевешивают сложность.
Это — сеткомет для Mavic ил…
Видео перехвачено с дрона противника системой "Бинокль" на частоте 7.2 ГГц
Система видеоперехвата «Бинокль»: скрытность, точность, контроль. 📡🎯
«Бинокль» — наш флагманский комплекс для перехвата видеосигналов БПЛА противника. Разработан для работы в непосредственной близости от ЛБС, обеспечивая оператору преимущество в ситуационной осведомленности.
Ключевые возможности:
- Скрытность: Версия для скрытой установки.…
Рабочие моменты🛡❤️
Каждый день, который мы проживаем, каждая разработка, каждый «рабочий момент» — подчинены одной единственной цели: спасти как можно больше жизней наших бойцов.
Мы просыпаемся и засыпаем с мыслью о том, как сделать наши изделия еще эффективнее. Как придумать следующее поколение средств противодействия, которое будет на шаг впереди вызовов противника.
Мы не сидим в кабинетах. Мы — там, где реально…
Небо должно быть чистым: от помех и от сюрпризов погоды.
🌤️🛰️Мы в «Спектре Угрозы» работаем над тем, чтобы небо над позициями было под нашим контролем. Но контроль — это не только РЭБ, это еще и полное понимание того, что происходит в атмосфере.Наши коллеги и партнеры, «ребята с соседней орбиты», создали инструмент, который кардинально меняет работу пилотов БПЛА.
Что дает их приложение:
🔹 Глобальный охват: Теперь о…
Наши «зубы» закаляются в сердце Сибири. 🌲⚙️
Где-то среди сибирских лесов, вдали от суеты, начинается то, чего так боится противник. Именно здесь, в Новосибирске, мы разворачиваем нашу базу разработки «бескомпромиссных ответов».
Мы объединили энергию современных решений с мощью фундаментальной науки. Наш партнер — старейший институт страны с более чем 60-летней историей — взял на себя задачу «заточить кромку» на наши…
Киплинг всегда в теме. «Иметь зубы» — главный закон джунглей. 🐺⚔️
Киплинг в «Маугли» был прав: чтобы выжить в джунглях, нужно иметь зубы. Этот совет актуален везде, где идет борьба, и уж тем более он актуален в военное время.
Мы решили: если уж мы заходим в наши «джунгли», то у нас должны быть самые острые клыки.
«Спектр Угрозы» не просто разрабатывает оборудование — мы растим «зубы» для наших изделий.
Каждый наш к…
https://t.me/proekt_arhangel/809
Инженерная мысль в нашей сфере не стоит на месте. Мы активно ведем разработки своих решений, но с интересом наблюдаем и за тем, как решают задачи коллеги.
Наши друзья сейчас работают над перехватчиками в другой конфигурации.
В чем разница? В то время как мы фокусируемся на определенных узлах, коллеги пробуют иные компоновочные схемы и подходы к управлению полетом. Это важно: создание…
⚙️ Размышления о перехватчике: от наблюдения к действию.
Создать просто приемник — задача понятная. Но создание перехватчика с боевой частью — это уже другой уровень инженерного вызова. Мы часто обсуждаем это : технически решение выглядит линейным, но каждый из пяти этапов — это отдельный «узел» проблем, которые нужно развязать.
План реализации, который мы видим:
🤏Детектирование и захват цели: Мало «увидеть» дрон. …
Правило «Спектр Угрозы»: не экономить на нюансах. 🛡️⚙️
Оборудование, связанное с безопасностью — это то, от чего напрямую зависит жизнь. В условиях ЛБС «второго шанса» у техники может не быть, поэтому мы проектируем наши комплексы РЭБ и РЭР с учетом трех «золотых» принципов:
Полевая ремонтопригодность:
Любой узел должен обслуживаться «на коленке». Мы исключаем сложные проприетарные решения там, где их нельзя замени…
👍6❤4⚡1🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @spektr_ugrozy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Спектр Угроз |РЭБ и РЭР|Инженерный дневник” (@spektr_ugrozy), 2,205 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spektr_ugrozy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
