SPILL @NAYELSO PENIPU AKUN NOKPREM pinned «tg://openmessage?user_id=7142274827»
Channel
SPILL @NAYELSO PENIPU AKUN NOKPREM
@spillnayelso
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 26 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004486345285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spillnayelso |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spillnayelso |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 3 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:22 | 2 | no change |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 26 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1893.3%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 56.8
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (26 October 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 568 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
dan aku mau reminder ke semuanya untuk selalu berbuat baik ya, dimanapun. agak gak enak aja tbtb dapet chat begitu hehe, dikatain segala macem yg jelas jelas aku sudah beri bukti bahwa aku bukanlah Cici itu, disini aku juga dibodohin sama cici wkwkk
SPILL @NAYELSO PENIPU AKUN NOKPREM pinned «kalau ada yang mau nambahin spillan ini, atau kritik dan saran boleh yaahhh»
kalau ada yang mau nambahin spillan ini, atau kritik dan saran boleh yaahhh
be aware aja pokoknya semuanya, nanti bakal aku update lagi semuanya tentang cici ini.
ini milik kakak yg marah marah td ya spillan nya
spillan lainnya ada di https://t.me/oncyePENIPU
ya aku ngga menyalahkan kakaknya sih karena kakaknya juga ketipu sama si Cici ini, tapi sayang banget dia rude dan ga bisa memahami situasi, gabisa kontrol amarahnya juga huhu padahal kita sama sama korban ya..
lantas ada orang rude ini yang ke rc akun nokprem itu marahin aku, aku udah jelasin ke dia kalau udah ganti kepemilikan malah ngotot, maaf jg krn aku pake bahasa kasar, LITERALLY AKU GATAU APA APA.... AKU BAHKAN UDAH CEK SEMUANYA TP GADA JEJAK DIA WOI makannya aku kaya aduuhhh, monyet nih si Cici ini, kesannya malah kaya adudomba aku sama si kakaknya ini
ya terus ada yg chat aku di akun nokprem itu, aku straight forward buat nanya ke dia tp ga dijawab, bahkan aku chat admin rekber yg handle semalem juga ga dibales huhu, maksudnya biar aku tau transaksi semalem gt, biar aku bs ss juga kalau memang diizinkan buat masuk ke room nya lg
abis aku amanin nokpremnya dia cc, aku pun nanya ke dia 😭
dan setelah aku login aku masih tanya" ke dia ini nokprem bekas apa, buat jaga jaga aja yakan, dan aku sempet minta rnk juga ke dia
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @spillnayelso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPILL @NAYELSO PENIPU AKUN NOKPREM” (@spillnayelso), 3 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillnayelso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.