Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spill @snveeze 8734914904

Channel

Spill @snveeze 8734914904

@spillsnveeze

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003912244896
TypeChannel
Username@spillsnveeze
First recorded30 September 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/spillsnveeze

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 16:221first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1713.3%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.1
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held15 (30 September 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total257
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC19 viewsread 30 September 2026

Mohon jadikan informasi ini sebagai bahan pertimbangan dan tetap berhati-hati apabila bertransaksi dengan akun tersebut 🤞🏻

30 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC19 viewsread 30 September 2026

Saya membuat informasi ini bukan untuk mengajak siapapun mengambil kesimpulan secara sepihak, tetapi sebagai bentuk peringatan berdasarkan pengalaman dan bukti chat serta transaksi yang saya miliki. Saya juga ga dapat memastikan apakah QRIS yang digunakan dalam transaksi tersebut merupakan milik @snveeze secara langsung atau milik pihak lain/jaspin. Karena itu, saya menyampaikan sebatas hal-hal yang dapat saya tunjuk…

30 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC19 viewsread 30 September 2026

Untuk teman-teman yang sedang atau berencana melakukan transaksi dengan @snveeze (ID: 8734914904), saya menyarankan untuk lebih berhati-hati dan ga terburu-buru dalam melakukan pembayaran. Pastikan terlebih dahulu identitas pihak yang menerima pembayaran, detail jasa atau barang yang ditawarkan, serta seluruh kesepakatan sudah benar-benar jelas. Jika memungkinkan, gunakan metode transaksi yang dapat memberikan keaman…

30 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC19 viewsread 30 September 2026

Setelah pembayaran, aku beberapa kali melakukan follow up karena hasil editnya belum juga dikirim, sedangkan tugas tersebut sudah mendekati deadline. Aku juga sudah meminta kejelasan dan bilang kalau memang ga bisa handle, tolong bilang supaya aku masih punya waktu untuk mencari seller/jasa lain. Pihak tersebut sempat merespons, tetapi hasil yang sudah dibayar tetap ga dikirim sampai akhirnya komunikasinya kembali n…

30 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTC17 viewsread 30 September 2026

Untuk QRIS nya sendiri saya gatau pasti apakah itu QR milik dia langsung atau QR jaspin/pihak lain, jadi saya gabisa memastikan pemilik QRIS tersebut adalah orang yang sama dengan akun yang saya hubungi.

30 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC16 viewsread 30 September 2026

Kronologi awal: Awalnya saya menghubungi @snveeze untuk menggunakan jasa edit video. Saya mengirimkan reference/contoh video dan menjelaskan konsep serta durasi yang saya butuhkan. Saya memilih menggunakan jasa ini karena saat itu saya ga sempat mengerjakan tugasnya sendiri karena ada urusan lain yang harus saya kerjakan. Setelah itu, kami membahas harga dan disepakati totalnya sebesar Rp47.000. Setelah harga dan p…

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @spillsnveeze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spill @snveeze 8734914904” (@spillsnveeze), 1 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spillsnveeze.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.