Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OLOTHEA

Channel

OLOTHEA

@spiritualscience

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,191subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058227051
TypeChannel
Username@spiritualscience
Created12 July 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/spiritualscience

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Spiritual Science Channel” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

3,1883,2503,2195 August 2026 — 3,250 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,250 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,244 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,232 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,229 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,225 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,221 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,216 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,212 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,205 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,196 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,188 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,191 subscribers3,1915 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,179–3,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:583,191+3
13 Sept 2026, 07:393,188-8
9 Sept 2026, 02:003,196-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:203,205-7
31 Aug 2026, 16:173,212-4
28 Aug 2026, 21:153,216-5
25 Aug 2026, 19:423,221-4
22 Aug 2026, 22:073,225-4
19 Aug 2026, 03:243,229-3
16 Aug 2026, 04:043,232-12
12 Aug 2026, 12:043,244-6
6 Aug 2026, 04:483,250no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:533,250first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
2m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1131.4%
😍720.0%
😁411.4%
🔥38.57%
🤣38.57%
🤯38.57%
❤‍🔥12.86%
🎉12.86%
💘12.86%
🙉12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miladitianaFile

File, posted without a caption

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC26 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miladitianaFile

File, posted without a caption

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC27 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miladitiana

For a long time many have been asking me for a formalization of my psycho-logic. I have worked based on it for many years. And now I finally cared to write it down! Modern Psychology knows what a person must not fall below, and it has little to say about what they could become. Its measure throughout is suffering: suffering decides what gets treated and when it may stop. A strategy that costs something is therefore …

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC87 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miladitiana

The eclipse in Leo is a reset of the solar principle itself: identity, will, visibility, creative authority, leadership and the courage to occupy space. Because this is a South Node eclipse on the Leo–Aquarius axis, it can also expose forms of identity that have become performative or dependent on recognition. The central question is not simply How can I shine? but What within me is real when the audience disappears?…

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC82 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miladitianaPhoto

Astrological meaning of August 12, 2026 In tropical astrology, the total solar eclipse occurs at approximately 20° Leo. Mercury and Jupiter are also in Leo; Mars has just entered Cancer; Uranus is in Gemini; Saturn and Neptune are retrograde in Aries; Venus is in Libra; and Pluto is retrograde in Aquarius. The widely advertised “six-planet alignment” is therefore not a six-planet conjunction: Mercury, Jupiter, Mars,…

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

6 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2084664403945775416

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁3❤‍🔥1🙉1

Signed 𐍂x

4 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍7

Signed rex 𓁹𖦹𓁹

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC144 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤10

Signed rex 𓁹𖦹𓁹

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC175 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤯2

Signed ᴍ ɪ ʟ ᴇ ɴ ᴀ

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @spiritualscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sadhguru
@Sadhguru · 22,918
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Brahmakumaris BK Shivani
@brahmakumaris_bkshivani · 27,033
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Maharashtra State Board Books
@maharashtra_state_boardbooks · 22,736
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
BAMS UG & PG Notes ( Ayurveda+ Modern) #AIAPGET , BAMS Exit Test ( NExT)
@AyurvedStudyHub · 23,206
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OLOTHEA” (@spiritualscience), 3,191 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spiritualscience.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.