Channel
@sporthandicap
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
342subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004363089836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sporthandicap |
| Created | 14 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sporthandicap |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 342 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 344 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 345 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 341 | +48 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 293 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 305 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 305 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 301 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
281 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 108 | 38.4% | |
| 🖕 | 60 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 35 | 12.5% | |
| 🤡 | 34 | 12.1% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 3.91% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 2.85% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.712% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.356% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.356% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.356% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Top Football Leagues in the World 🌍 Opta has released its Top 100 ranking of the strongest football leagues in the world. 1. Premier League 🏴 2. La Liga 🇪🇸 3. Bundesliga 🇩🇪 4. Serie A 🇮🇹 5. Ligue 1 🇫🇷 … 18. 🇺🇸 Major League Soccer (MLS) … … 41. 🇸🇦 Saudi Pro League
❤4🔥1
Jokes aside, Argentina were absolutely outstanding, especially in the final 20 minutes! Their chemistry, determination, and Messi’s brilliance allowed them to turn the game around and defeat England. England’s coach’s decision to switch to three center-backs and sit deep in defense was questionable. It would have made more sense to strengthen the midfield with a defensive midfielder and continue playing positive, at…
❤5👍4🥰1
Argentina's physical approach against England has become one of the biggest talking points from the World Cup semi-final, with numerous clips of robust challenges circulating widely across social media. Fans have highlighted several incidents where Argentina players escaped without yellow cards, arguing the referee allowed a level of physicality that would normally have been punished. The viral compilations have fu…
❤2😁2
🏴England vs Argentina🇦🇷 Tonight’s second World Cup semifinal promises to be another blockbuster🔥⚽ Argentina has reached this stage through a series of very controversial matches. Every knockout victory came after extra time, despite facing opponents who, on paper, weren’t among the tournament’s strongest. They narrowly escaped against Cape Verde and needed a dramatic late comeback to get past Egypt. Their mot…
❤6💩6🔥3😁2
Well… Not the start I was hoping for 😄 In yesterday’s match, mentality, unity, and team spirit made the difference. 🇪🇸Spain delivered an outstanding team performance, fully focused on getting the result. Their midfield, especially Rodri, gave France almost no opportunity to play their usual game or create dangerous chances. Without a doubt, it was Spain’s best performance of this World Cup so far. 🇫🇷France, on the…
🙏2👌1
🇫🇷France vs Spain🇪🇸 🏆World Cup Semifinal Today, France takes on Spain! This is a semifinal that truly deserves to be the final. In my opinion, the winner of this match is very likely to become the World Cup champion. 🇫🇷France has been playing beautiful, confident football throughout the tournament, the kind of football that reminds us why we love this sport. They have arguably the strongest midfield and attacking …
🤣106🖕58🤡29❤14🍌8💩5😭4👍2
The day has come. I’m here to share the sports knowledge I’ve built through years of training, watching, commentating, analyzing, and betting. With over 15 years of experience in sports, I’ve developed an understanding that goes far beyond the average fan. Now it’s time to put that knowledge to good use! So you, my subscribers, can make smarter bets and earn alongside me.
🤡5❤4🖕2🤣2🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sporthandicap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HandiCap” (@sporthandicap), 342 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sporthandicap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.