Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы | СпортМ+

Channel

Отзывы | СпортМ+

@sportmplus_reviews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

198subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002581571417
TypeChannel
Username@sportmplus_reviews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sportmplus_reviews

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17019818429 August 2026 — 170 subscribers29 August 2026 — 170 subscribers7 September 2026 — 172 subscribers14 September 2026 — 176 subscribers28 September 2026 — 180 subscribers9 October 2026 — 184 subscribers15 October 2026 — 189 subscribers23 October 2026 — 192 subscribers29 October 2026 — 198 subscribers29 August 202629 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 61 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 166–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 16:18198+6
23 Oct 2026, 11:00192+3
15 Oct 2026, 09:56189+5
9 Oct 2026, 01:19184+4
28 Sept 2026, 04:42180+4
14 Sept 2026, 23:19176+4
7 Sept 2026, 15:00172+2
29 Aug 2026, 19:00170no change
29 Aug 2026, 18:47170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤360.0%
👍240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC31 viewsread 29 August 2026

Всем добра! Всё как всегда на высшем уровне, от души благодарю команду СпортМ+, за предоставление скидки! Удачи и процветания Вам! Вместо 5130 заплатил 2990, 🔥🔥🔥

26 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC41 viewsread 29 August 2026

Сдавал анализы в helix, через ваш сервис, все четко. Приехал, сказал номер заказа, все подтвердили, никаких проблем не возникло.

17 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC105 viewsread 29 August 2026

В очередной раз воспользовался услугой данного сервиса, все как всегда на высшем уровне!!

16 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC115 viewsread 29 August 2026

Спасибо , все как всегда супер быстро! Спасибо вам что вы есть ❤️

13 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Сегодня вновь сдал анализы с помощью сервиса, за что хочу в очередной раз поблагодарить команду! Скидка составила около 30% 🤝

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вечер добрый. Спасибо всей команде спортм+, сегодня сдал в очередной раз без проблем анализы. Спасибо. Все как всегда на высшем уровне. 👍

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC208 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Всем привет! Выражаю благодарность ребятам за помощь и возможность сдать анализы с хорошей скидкой! Консультант подсказал по перечню показателей, которые мне необходимо проверить с учетом моего запроса, ответ в чате почти мгновенный. Я наполнил корзину анализов, сразу же получил окончательную стоимость с учетом скидки, ссылку на оплату и подробную инструкцию с дальнейшим действиями! Заявку оформил около 19:00 вечера …

❤2

21 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC213 viewsread 29 August 2026

Спасибо большое за оформление анализов) Скидка вышла достаточно ощутимая. Анализы сдал без проблем, результаты пришли.

21 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC195 viewsread 29 August 2026

На днях сдавал анализы , через добрый людей , спасибо большое , почти 50 процентов экономии 🫂

21 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC200 viewsread 29 August 2026

Сегодня сдал в очередной раз анализы, все отлично. Спасибо большое организации спорт м +🤝

8 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC261 viewsread 29 August 2026

В очередной раз сдался. В этот раз кдл. Как всегда от оформления до сдачи все прошло быстро, легко, удобно. Вчера сделал заявку, сегодня сдался. Корзина 5900, к оплате 3600. Спасибо команде Спорт М🤝

1 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC288 viewsread 29 August 2026

Тоже хочу поделиться положительным опытом сдачи анализов. Корзину исследований я формировала через компанию "Спорт М+". Организация сработала мега-оперативно: менеджеры быстро оформили все документы и предоставили приятную скидку, что очень порадовало. Сдать кровь в лаборатории я смогла уже на следующий день после обращения. Готовые результаты тоже не заставили себя ждать и пришли очень быстро. Большое спасибо за ско…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sportmplus_reviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы | СпортМ+” (@sportmplus_reviews), 198 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sportmplus_reviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.