Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4😁2👍1🔥1

Channel
@spyackinet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
221subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002073323323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spyackinet |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spyackinet |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 221 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 213 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 211 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 215 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 214 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 201 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 201 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 109 | 58.6% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 27.4% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 3.76% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.69% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.69% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 2.69% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4😁2👍1🔥1
💕 А иногда можно смотреть по сторонам и не увидеть друг друга) Эта история случилась со мной буквально на следующий день после истории с картиной. И удивительным образом она тоже оказалась связана с искусством. И самое интересное, что тоже с картиной и тоже в Петербурге. Случайности ведь не случайны) Запишу голосом, чтобы передать все эмоции) и подробно рассказать про инструменты нетворкинга любопытное живое общени…
❤4😁1
Приезжаю я на переговоры и вижу на стене в кабинете руководителей картину, на которой изображен маяк. И сразу её замечаю и говорю, что она очень красивая. А дальше узнаю, что оказывается, «маяк» - это не просто так. Папа владельца компании был моряком и если приглядеться, то в кабинете можно было заметить множество предметов, связанных с морской тематикой. Даже настоящий штурвал, за который когда-то держался папа. …
❤8🔥5
💕Если смотреть по сторонам, то всегда можно найти тему для начала разговора) Достаточно часто на своих выступлениях я рассказываю про одну птицу. И, если честно, то я всегда забываю её название, но один факт я запомнила очень хорошо - эта птица обладает уникальным строением глаз, чей обзор составляет почти 360 градусов. И вот эта способность помогает ей в жизни во многих вещах)) Так и у нас :) если поворачивать го…
❤4🔥3
Я его заблокировал на атаке и, он мне кинул респект На фото, если вдруг не узнали, актёр Дмитрий Дюжев)
❤5🔥4
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4👏3🔥1
Завтра в 18:30 мы встретимся в чудесном пространстве на Фрунзенской) У нас будет 4 спикера, каждый из которых поделится своими размышлениями: 🔻Екатерина Астахова (CEO, член советов директоров в промышленности и FMCG, выпускница Сколково) — об устойчивости через систему, а не силу воли 🔻Елена Поспелова (директор по персоналу PRODEX, кандидат экономических наук, доцент РЭУ им. Плеханова, сертифицированный коуч) — о …
❤9🔥2
💕Вечерние посиделки Лучшее, что можно придумать) встречи без повода, разговоры по душам, квартирники или просто уютный вечер за чашечкой кофе я очень люблю формат, когда люди спонтанно объединяются и проводят что-то совместное. Когда нет серьезной повестки и подготовки. Но есть те, кто горят своей темой и любопытством к этому миру) Помню, как я однажды пригласила Сашу Дудорова поговорить не про фасилитацию, а про …
❤5🔥2
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤6🥰4
Video, posted without a caption
❤4🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3🔥3🥰3🤗2
💕 Приглашаю на запись подкаста Я давно мечтала, чтобы у меня появилась своя студия, куда бы я могла приглашать интересных гостей и разговаривать с ними по душам))) Своей студии пока нет, но есть чудесный партнёр ИнфоПространство💕 на чьей площадке мы завтра запишем первый выпуск)) спонтанно мне в голову пришла мысль, а почему бы не пригласить зрителей :) Мест мало, но вдруг кто-то из вас захочет к нам присоединить…
❤10🔥9😍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spyackinet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СПЯЧКИ.НЕТ нетворк-агентство| Алёна Царькова” (@spyackinet), 221 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spyackinet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.