Вы уже купили всё к школе?
- Да38%
- Будем ещё докупать19%
- Даже не начинали...44%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@sravni_tg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,748subscribers
+622 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001496327460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sravni_tg |
| Created | 4 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sravni_tg |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 9,748 | +167 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 9,581 | +129 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 9,452 | +162 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 9,290 | +101 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 9,189 | +77 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 9,112 | +83 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 9,029 | +79 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 8,950 | +38 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 8,912 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 8,933 | -42 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 8,975 | -56 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 9,031 | -83 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 9,114 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 9,126 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (14 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,957 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
517 reactions across 36 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 154 | 29.8% | |
| 👍 | 128 | 24.8% | |
| 🔥 | 92 | 17.8% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 7.16% | |
| 👀 | 30 | 5.80% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 3.09% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 1.93% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.35% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.774% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.774% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.58% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы уже купили всё к школе?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😱 До 1 сентября осталось четыре дня Самое время свериться: собрали ли вы уже всё для школы, или список покупок ещё не закрыт? И главное, дорогие родители, сил и терпения вам 💚
❤4👍2🔥2😢1
«Хотите зарабатывать 90 тысяч рублей в месяц, работая 2 часа в день?» SuperJob вместе со Сравни выяснили, как выглядит наём в нормальной компании, и как маскируются мошенники. Разница есть на каждом этапе: от первого сообщения до тестового задания А вам приходили подобные предложения? ❤️ — нет, никогда 🏆 — да, но вовремя раскусил(-а) 🧑💻 — было, потерял(-а) деньги
❤9🔥4🏆3👨💻1
📱 Ребёнок просит дорогой телефон к школе. Покупать или нет? Тема, в которой легко почувствовать вину. Купите дорогой телефон — появится ощущение, что разбаловали ребёнка. Откажете — появится ощущение, что обделили его Разберём без вины, по шагам: 🔘Спросите, для чего именно ему нужен сейчас телефон: для связи, для конкретных функций вроде камеры или мощности, или просто потому, что телефон есть у всех однокласснико…
👍2🔥2❤1
👀 Как научить ребёнка копить деньги уже с первого класса? Ребёнок, который с раннего возраста понимает, откуда берутся деньги и куда уходят, реже совершает импульсивные покупки и влезает в долги, когда взрослеет Пять рабочих методов, которые советуют эксперты по финансовой грамотности 1⃣Давайте карманные деньги регулярно Не за оценки и не за помощь по дому, а просто на постоянной основе. Например, раз в неделю неб…
❤9🤣4👌3
Posted without readable text
🌚3😱3👍2👎1
Вы бы пошли учиться ради повышения зарплаты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎓 Вы бы пошли учиться ради повышения зарплаты? Курсы, вторая вышка, смена профессии — сегодня способов больше, чем кажется. Вопрос в том, готовы ли вы вложить время и деньги ради роста дохода Голосуйте в опросе🔽
👍9❤2🤔2👎1🔥1
⚡️Сменить профессию можно за 23 тысячи рублей Собрали пять недорогих курсов на витрине Сравни, после которых можно освоить новую профессию или получить дополнительный навык 1⃣Графический дизайн + ИИ: 22 900 рублей 2⃣Контекстная реклама: 26 900 рублей 3⃣Финансовый учёт и анализ: 35 000 рублей 4⃣Спортивная диетология и нутрициология: 39 700 рублей 5⃣JavaScript-разработчик: 39 900 рублей ✔️Полный каталог курсов д…
❤5👍2👀1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥11👍3😱3❤1
🎒 5 финансовых ошибок, которые родители совершают перед школой До 1 сентября остаётся три недели. Самое время учесть чужие ошибки, и не совершать свои 1️⃣Покупают всё в последний момент В конце августа выбор меньше, а цены выше. Форма и канцелярия дорожают именно в сезон пикового спроса 2️⃣Берут дорогие бренды по привычке Ребёнок за год перерастёт форму и порвёт пенал вне зависимости от цены. Переплата за бренд …
👍8❤3🔥3
Смена профессии может окупиться меньше чем за год Разбираем, сколько стоит переучиться в 2026 году и когда это себя окупает ©️Курсы переквалификации стоят от 15 до 150 тысяч рублей. Цена зависит от сферы, длительности программы и того, дают ли диплом государственного образца Вот на какие зарплаты можно рассчитывать после обучения в разных сферах: 🔹HR-специалист: 57–122 тысячи рублей 🔹Массажист (начинающий): 40–70…
❤9👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @sravni_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы уже купили всё к школе?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы бы пошли учиться ради повышения зарплаты?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы планируете оплачивать подготовку ребенка к школе в этом году?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Стоит ли ограничивать партнера в тратах?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что будет со ставкой на ближайшем заседании ЦБ 24 июля?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ваши фактические расходы на отпуск обычно превышают запланированный бюджет?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сравни” (@sravni_tg), 9,748 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sravni_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.