Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -493. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,007–3,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:36
1,335
-2,019
14 Sept 2026, 04:57
3,354
-31
10 Sept 2026, 04:59
3,385
-30
5 Sept 2026, 05:55
3,415
-108
1 Sept 2026, 15:13
3,523
+196
29 Aug 2026, 22:47
3,327
-69
27 Aug 2026, 00:27
3,396
+274
24 Aug 2026, 04:57
3,122
-58
20 Aug 2026, 04:04
3,180
-64
17 Aug 2026, 09:48
3,244
-53
14 Aug 2026, 02:16
3,297
+1,474
11 Aug 2026, 00:05
1,823
-4
8 Aug 2026, 10:21
1,827
-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:48
1,828
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,828
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
170 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
119
70.0%
🤯
14
8.24%
❤🔥
13
7.65%
🔥
8
4.71%
😱
7
4.12%
👍
4
2.35%
👏
4
2.35%
💯
1
0.588%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قدم نصير الدين الطوسي في كتابه «تحرير أصول إقليدس» معالجة لمسألة التوازي وحاول مناقشة المسلمة الخامسة لإقليدس وإثباتها هندسياً وقد سبقت هذه المحاولات أعمال هيلبرت بقرون الذي أعاد لاحقاً صياغة أسس الهندسة بطريقة أكسيومية دقيقة.
ولهذا يذكر الطوسي في تاريخ الهندسة بوصفه من العلماء الذين ناقشوا أسس الهندسة ومسلماتها في وقت مبكر قبل أن تصل هذه المسائل إلى صورتها الحديثة.
احتفالاً بوصول منصة ServerForge إلى أكثر من 500 مستخدم، قررنا تقديم سيرفر مجاني كهدية لأحد مستخدمي منصتنا، وبمواصفات جيدة وليست ضعيفة.
طريقة الدخول إلى السيرفر :
1. أرسل الأمر /gift إلى البوت.
2. بعدها أرسل الكود التالي:
SF-2ZRZ67U9
الهدية لمستخدم واحد فقط.
حظاً موفقاً للجميع ❤.
To celebrate ServerForge reaching more than 500 users, we’ve decided to give away a free server as a gift to one of our users, with go…
اشتريت 0.15 سهم من شركة Tesla
خطوة بسيطة لكنها بداية جيدة للاستثمار وتنويع المحفظة الآن صار عندي حصة في Tesla وأتطلع لمتابعة أداء السهم خلال الفترة القادمة ومعرفة كيف سيتغير الاستثمار مع حركة السوق.
أسعى إلى إنشاء نموذج ذكاء اصطناعي يمتلك معرفة متخصصة بفلسفة آرثر شوبنهاور بحيث يستطيع تحليل مؤلفاته وشرح مفاهيمه والإجابة عن الأسئلة المتعلقة بفلسفته إضافة إلى تحليل نقده لكانط وهيغل وأفلاطون وغيرهم مع الاستشهاد بالنصوص الأصلية.
لن نعتمد على تدريب نموذج من الصفر لأن ذلك يتطلب مليارات الكلمات وآلاف ساعات التدريب وهو أمر غير عملي لمشروع متخصص بدلاً من ذلك سنستخدم نموذج Qwen ثم نبني فوقه نظام يجعله خبيراً في فلسفة شوبن…
“أعتقد أن مهنة عالم الرياضيات ستختفي في المستقبل ولا أرى أن الرياضيات استثناء فالأمر نفسه قد يحدث في كثير من المجالات الأخرى.”
— جاكوب تسيمرمان، الحاصل على ميدالية فيلدز لهذا العام.
يسرّنا الإعلان عن اكتمال النسخة V0.1.0 من @ServerFrogebot بعد سلسلة من مراحل التطوير والاختبار وأصبحت المنصة جاهزة لتقديم خدماتها بشكل مستقر.
صممت البنية الداخلية للمنصة بحيث تكون قابلة للتوسع لذلك ستصل التحديثات والخدمات الجديدة بشكل مستمر دون التأثير على السيرفرات العاملة أو تجربة المستخدم.
يعمل كل سيرفر داخل بيئة معزولة ومستقلة عن غيره مع فصل كامل للموارد والعمليات يوفّر هذا الأسلوب مستوى أعلى من الأمان ويحد من…
احتاج Martinus Veltman إلى خمس سنوات لاجتياز امتحان جامعي يفترض عادة أن ينجز خلال ثلاث سنوات، وخلال معظم تلك الفترة لم يكن علم الفيزياء قد أثار اهتمامه الحقيقي بعد.
كان قد اجتاز بصعوبة امتحان التخرج من المدرسة الثانوية عام 1948 وبسبب درجاته المنخفضة كان قبوله في كلية تقنية غير مؤكد إلى أن زار معلم الفيزياء والديه شخصياً، ونصحهما بإرساله إلى الجامعة بدلًا من ذلك.
في Utrecht University، وجد فيلتمان أن أسلوب التدريس ف…
من أراد التواصل معي بشأن عمل أو استفسار أو أي أمر ذي صلة فليتفضل بمراسلتي عبر القناة فالرسائل مفتوحة وذلك لمدة وجيزة.
❤7👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ssabtainn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سبطين حنوف” (@ssabtainn), 1,335 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssabtainn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.