Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
SSC CGL 2026
@ssccgltarge2026
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,788subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002130691731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ssccgltarge2026 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ssccgltarge2026 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 6,788 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 6,794 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 6,787 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 6,788 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 6,784 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 6,780 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 6,773 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 6,772 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 6,784 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 6,790 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 6,791 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 6,792 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
176 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 69.9% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 23.9% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
UPSC EPFO Assistant Provident Fund Commisioner (APFC) 2026 Short Notice released !! Application Date: 22 Aug 2026- 11 Sept 2026 As updated in the notification Vacancies: APFC : 80
👍1
In Mains
❤16👍5
Sectional Timing
❤5
SSC CGL 2026 pinned «🔴 Notification of SSC CGL 2026 Out 🔥 🔥 • Timeline to apply - 21 May to 22 June • Window for correction - 29th June to 1st August (11 PM) • Tier 1 date - Aug-Sept»
🔴 Notification of SSC CGL 2026 Out 🔥 🔥 • Timeline to apply - 21 May to 22 June • Window for correction - 29th June to 1st August (11 PM) • Tier 1 date - Aug-Sept
❤9
Notice_of_adv_cgl_2026.pdf
SSC CGL 2026 GST Inspector Vacancies (Lucknow Zone)👇 UR : 214 OBC : 142 EWS : 94 SC : 104 ST : 27 Total Vacancies : 581🔥 CGL 25 : 33 Till Now, 1645 GST Inspector Vacancies Reported For CGL 2026.
🔥29❤16👍3
SSC CGL 2026 GST Inspector Vacancies (Mumbai Zone)👇 UR : 80 OBC : 108 EWS : 16 SC : 35 ST : 21 Total Vacancies : 260 CGL 25 : 349 Till Now, 1021 GST Inspector Vacancies Reported For CGL 2026. 🤝
❤10
Final Vacancies of Combined Graduate Level Examination, 2025 (as on 06.03.2026)
❤5
5_6149694909268893452.pdf
🇮🇳 Sources of the Constitution of India . The Constitution was adopted on 26 November 1949 and came into force on 26 January 1950. 🔷 1️⃣ United Kingdom India borrowed many parliamentary features from the UK. 📌 Borrowed Features: Parliamentary system of government Rule of Law Cabinet system Office of Prime Minister Bicameral legislature Single citizenship Legislative procedure 👉 Most important source for Indian Const…
❤14🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ssccgltarge2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@UPSC_UPPSC_SSC_ALL · 87,504
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
@microbiology_vid · 57,460
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
@BIHAR_DAROGA_SI_BSSC_GK_GS_AEDO · 177,596
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@UPSC_NCERT_GK_CSE_EPFO_IB_ACIO · 76,239
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@UPSC_POLITY_BPSC_HISTORY_GK_QUIZ · 285,093
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@GK_GS_CA_HUB · 186,239
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@englishbybarkhamam · 97,547
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@gvwitmover · 112,397
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
@acadla · 21,451
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SSC CGL 2026” (@ssccgltarge2026), 6,788 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssccgltarge2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.