Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Slumber-Shedding Chimera

Channel

Slumber-Shedding Chimera

@sschimera

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 8 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003166478126
TypeChannel
Username@sschimera
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sschimera

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6478718 October 2026 — 64 subscribers12 October 2026 — 77 subscribers25 October 2026 — 78 subscribers31 October 2026 — 77 subscribers778 October 202631 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 22:4577-1
25 Oct 2026, 07:3578+1
12 Oct 2026, 11:0977+13
8 Oct 2026, 13:2264first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.1%
avg views ÷ 77 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held15 (8 September 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total125
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 530777294434312730579100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC11 viewsread 8 October 2026
Poll

Люди меняются?

  1. Да80%
  2. Нет20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Oct 2026, 21:38 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

Влекли его мысли о потерянном рае с остатками сухих следов покоя. Несложно твердить из доброй воли безмолвного слова, ведь маска всё равно того велика. Он вопит о несдаче без боя в са́мой геенне какой бы ни был огонь, а за ним пылающий смрад. С гулом, ранним утром по морю ударил резвый норд-ост. В тревоге проснулся от вихря, почуяв нечто неладное. Нам всегда говорили, что мир непрост, Но, непросто оказалось осознать…

custom 53077729443431273052

7 Oct 2026, 10:02 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 8 October 2026
File

Daylight In bad dreams In a cool world Full of cruel things Hang tight All you Nothing like a big bad bridge To go burning through Держитесь крепче, все вы. Этот прохладный мир полон жестоких вещей, но он не оставляет надежд пронести свет внутрь обиталища ваших кошмаров. Это есть путь, невзирая на яркое пламя горящего моста под ногами, кажущейся несправедливости и непроявленного милосердия.

custom 53077729443431273055

2 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

Может, подобен ты айсбергу? Или кровь твоя горяча? Дышит таинством сила, что скрыта в невидной океанской лощине – в её самом начале. На моих ладонях иней. Цветущая заря не согревает под видом нового дня. Чувство – щебечущее знамя. Где оно, покинувшее меня?

custom 53077729443431273057

30 Sept 2026, 21:04 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

"...Всего лишь словил грусть. Пакостит меланхолия-дура и осенняя хандра в придачу". Дурное навевание пустоты. Всё настолько серьёзно? Нет. Всего лишь позволил себе задуматься. Ещё несколько лет назад мысли о прошлом подпитывали эго из страха оказаться на обочине жизни, давая мощнейший заряд вместе с постоянными сравнениями и потребностью в самоутверждении. Называется для молодого "завоевателя" "по кусочкам собирать …

custom 53077729443431273054

22 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Посмотри в мои глаза... в них ты сыщешь страх, а я уж как давно сыскал его в твоих. Солнце растопило сердца снежных гор, оттуда о нас я услышал ответ: "Будущее – точка, сумеречный сон до этих пор, где вас уж больше нет. Любовь между вами – пыль от летящей кометы, как магия света, что тьмою взята. Инь и ян... вы – неразлучная пара, как вам казалось тогда..." "Где ты, там и я..." – говорили друг другу. Наши мосты сож…

custom 53077729443431273056

21 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53077729443431273054

16 Sept 2026, 21:47 UTC96 views7 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53077729443431273057

15 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC98 views8 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Иногда кажется, что пишу с непоколебимой уверенностью, захваченный шармом своих повествований без использования абстрактных слов, олицетворений и метафор. Вовсе не стараюсь балансировать записями, как и не перестаю задаваться вопросами там, где мог бы подумать, что разбираюсь в описываемом предмете. Со временем копаю глубже. Зарытое в глубь земли семя, которому только и остаётся ждать прихода проливного дождя, однажд…

custom 53077729443431273058

15 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Окружающий мир я понимаю не в отсутствии конфликтов, а в динамической гармонии – равновесие между двумя состояниями, "миром" и "войной", которое на чашах весов испокон веков склоняется то в одну сторону, то в другую. Бывает, что равновесие сильно нарушается, и каждую из противоположностей приходится собирать заново по осколкам, осмысляя всё, что происходит. Это можно сравнить с ребёнком, что впервые в своей жизни уви…

custom 53077729443431273052

13 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC86 views9 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Исторически складывается так, что если вы не являетесь признанным специалистом в какой-либо области знаний, то ваша попытка как непримечательного человека внести иную мысль в устоявшийся общественный порядок принимается за простое сумасшествие. На слова "простака", по мнению подавляющего большинства, полагаться нельзя, и это даже презрительно. Внутренние механизмы души омыты радостью и слезами миллионов людей. Резон…

custom 53077729443431273059

11 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC105 views6 reactionsread 8 October 2026

"...Вы для всего причиной признаёте Одно лишь небо, словно все дела Оно вершит в своём круговороте. Будь это так, то в вас бы не была Свободной воля, правды бы не стало В награде за добро, в отмщенье зла. Влеченья от небес берут начало, — Не все; но скажем даже — все сполна, — Вам дан же свет, чтоб воля различала Добро и зло, и ежели она Осилит с небом первый бой опасный, То, с доброй пищей, победить должна. Вы л…

custom 53077729443431273056

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sschimera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

Люди меняются?

  1. Да80%
  2. Нет20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Slumber-Shedding Chimera” (@sschimera), 77 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sschimera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.