Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ssc update

Channel

Ssc update

@sscupdatee

Not marked by Telegram, checked 19 August 2026

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,135subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225934686
TypeChannel
Username@sscupdatee
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sscupdatee

Previous handles

@sscupdatee was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@TDelhipolice2025
held 16 August 202616 August 2026

Growth

1,1351,1551,14516 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,141 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,135 subscribers16 August 202630 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,132–1,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 14:471,135-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:221,137-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:071,139-2
21 Aug 2026, 06:451,141-14
17 Aug 2026, 17:561,155no change
16 Aug 2026, 21:301,155first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 1,135 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held40 (16 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total3,208
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3389.2%
🥰25.41%
👍12.70%
😁12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Delhi Police Constable Physical Update 20 August Day 2 Total - 6000 Present - 4153 Final Qualified - 2627 Total Passing Out Percent - 43% @ssctides @ssctides_Bot

1

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC93 viewsread 21 August 2026

Glt update kyu dete ho nhi pta rhta h kuch to nhi bol do nhi pta h h to 15 girls fail huwi height m tm 80 100 bol rhe Ho 👆 Ya uper msg koi RS name ki id na bot par bheja ha Ab m isliye bolta hu ki uneducated ki job nhi Lag ni Chaiye padhna lekh na aata nhi ha bas criticise karna ha So dear member 15 Girls Ground no 5 par out hui ha height m baki ka 5 ground or ha tho thoda padh liya karo

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC112 viewsread 21 August 2026

Aaj long jump m kam ladki fail ho rahi ha abhi tak Final passing ratio aaj ka 50% aa gaya ha Or passing ratio increase means cut off increase Height m bacha fail ho raha ha kal bhi hua ha aaj bhi ho raha ha tho agar apki height 170 cm sa .1 bhi kaam h tho out kar raha h

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC109 viewsread 21 August 2026

Aaj batch 100 ka bana ha and aaga bhi 100 ka bana ab daily And aaj passing ratio running m vahi 70% ha 100 m sa 70 , 72 , 65 but baat long jump ki ha Let see kya hota ha

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

2 batch ki running hogi haar ground par abhi tak aaj jaldi kara lega Running

1

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

कुल 30.5% बच्चे पास हुए हैं कल 😢

1

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Total Student Qualified per ground Ground 1 28% Ground 2 30% Ground 3 29.57% Ground 4 32.28% Ground 5 34.12% Ground 6 30.28%

1

Signed Arjun Yadav

20 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC135 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3

Signed Arjun Yadav

19 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC143 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Ground No 6 Review ( Batch 50 - 50 Students Present = 60 - 70 % Pass = 20 - 30 % ) out of total 10 - 20 Students Out in Running 10 - 20 Students Out in Long Jump Documents m mummy papa ka name m agar mistake h spelling tho koi issue nhi h accept kar raha h

2

Signed Arjun Yadav

19 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC149 viewsread 21 August 2026

So students Document verification m bhi fail ho raha ha Name dob surname spelling Mistake m bhi bhar kar raha ha

Signed Arjun Yadav

19 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC156 viewsread 21 August 2026

Ground 4 Batch 7 26 pass out of 50 in running

Signed Arjun Yadav

19 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Ground number 6 second batch 50 me se 32 race pass 14/32 long jump pass :- 18 Fail 13/13 high jump pass :- 1 fail 1 girl height me bhar h 12/50 Overall Qualified

3

Signed Arjun Yadav

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @sscupdatee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

Up police मै नंबर आया है किसी भाई का

  1. हाँ36%
  2. नही61%
  3. दिया नही 😄8%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UP Utkarsh
@UPUtkarsh · 65,309
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
Mudit GS Study
@anchalm2000 · 93,532
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
Preeti Mam Exampur Notes
@preetimamexampurnotes · 88,990
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ssc update” (@sscupdatee), 1,135 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sscupdatee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.