Channel
@ssev_etoile
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003444712556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ssev_etoile |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ssev_etoile |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 86 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 88 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 89 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 88 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 89 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 93 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 93 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 34 | 35.8% | |
| 🍓 | 28 | 29.5% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5285413589413304744 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5211118038241281006 | 4 | 4.21% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| custom 5366323708048720336 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ssev_etoile. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩appy birthday to me!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 На самом деле,я очень благодарна всем,кто находится здесь и следит за моим пинанием хуев творчеством.🤭 Большое спасибо!!
🍓9❤🔥6custom 52854135894133047443
૮ ⲇⲏёⲙ ⲣⲟⲯⲇⲉⲏυя ⲙⲉⲏя ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня у ʍᴇня дᴇнь ᴩᴏждᴇнᥙя. я ᴩᴀдᴀ, чᴛᴏ ʙы ᴏᴄᴛᴀᴇᴛᴇᴄь ᴄᴏ ʍнᴏᥔ, ᴩᴀдᴀ, чᴛᴏ ʙᴀʍ ᥙнᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏ ʍᴏё ᴛʙᴏᴩчᴇᴄᴛʙᴏ. δᴧᴀᴦᴏдᴀᴩнᴀ ʙᴄᴇʍ ᴛᴇʍ, ᴋᴛᴏ ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ-ᴧᥙδᴏ ᴨᴏддᴇᴩжᥙʙᴀᴧ ᴇᴦᴏ. ᴛᴀᴋжᴇ ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня ᥙᴄᴨᴏᴧняᴇᴛᴄя ᴦᴏд ϶ᴛᴏʍу ᴋᴀнᴀᴧу. ɜᴀ ϶ᴛᴏ ʙᴩᴇʍя я ᴨᴏɜнᴀᴋᴏʍᥙᴧᴀᴄь ᴄ ᴏчᴇнь ᴋᴧᴀᴄᴄныʍᥙ ᴧюдьʍᥙ, δᴇɜʍᴇᴩнᴏ ᴧюδᴧю ᥙ᥊ ʙᴄᴇ᥊. ⲙы ᥰρᥱκρᥲᥴн᧐ ᤋнᥲᥱⲙ, чᴛ᧐ ᧘учɯᥙᥔ ᥰ᧐дᥲρ᧐κ д᧘я κⲙ – ρᥱᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ ᥱᴦ᧐ ρᥲδ᧐ᴛ. ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐!!!
❤🔥2🍓2
Каждый день - значит каждый день. ° ° ° ☆ ° ° ° Коллаб с прекрасной: Fig ink #песньсорокопута #коллаб
❤🔥2
феникс,давай заведем серийчика,я набью татуировку на лбу
❤3custom 52854135894133047443❤🔥2
У меня есть хэд,что если бы Скэриэл и Джером были вампирами, то их дуэт ощущался бы как Лестат и Луи из «Интервью с вампиром»👼
❤🔥4🍓2
У ЛЮМЬЕРА ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЕ 🤩🤩🤩
❤🔥7❤3
Это пиздец,сколько я в чатах не разговариваю, всё сходится на том, что Я ОКАЗЫВАЕТСЯ ГОТЬЕ БЛЯТЬ. Я скоро сама начну в это верить #щп
❤6❤🔥2
Скэриэл и Готье
🍓8custom 52111180382412810064❤1❤🔥1
Решила окончательно позориться лицом и создала рабочий акк,на котором выкладываю видео💥 https://www.tiktok.com/@letoile_ssev1?_r=1
custom 52854135894133047444custom 53663237080487203361
ну кто-нибудь, ебните мне уже чем-то тяжелым, чтобы я начала писать, пожалуйста ну хватит уже ебланить
❤🔥4🥰1custom 53663237080487203361
8 человек до 100🥰🥰🥰
🍓7❤🔥1
Кукле вышла из своего же тгк и оставила его на меня💥
🔥3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ssev_etoile. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто вы по паспорту
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“летуалька чирикает • 🦢” (@ssev_etoile), 86 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssev_etoile.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.