Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘶𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦.

Channel

𝘶𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦.

@ssevverrusss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

187subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003938141820
TypeChannel
Username@ssevverrusss
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ssevverrusss

Growth

187204195.510 August 2026 — 204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 200 subscribers17 August 2026 — 198 subscribers24 August 2026 — 194 subscribers1 September 2026 — 189 subscribers10 September 2026 — 187 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 184–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 18:36187-2
1 Sept 2026, 05:46189-5
24 Aug 2026, 21:47194-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:18198-2
11 Aug 2026, 02:31200-4
10 Aug 2026, 08:15204first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

501 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537957698069177339613326.5%
custom 532780546208564748911422.8%
custom 53776771878077365817815.6%
custom 53799086294764382267314.6%
custom 5420227854010967244489.58%
custom 5348307660271788404214.19%
custom 5390982292116113970142.79%
custom 5294444788945272476102.00%
custom 5380035988141665448102.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 501 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ssevverrusss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC67 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @koshmarovav

НЕ ЗАХОДИТЕ ТАМ ОДИН РАЗВРАТ

custom 53799086294764382263custom 53483076602717884042custom 53795769806917733962

9 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC75 viewsread 10 August 2026

Создала чат, в который добавила несколько игровых ботов. Если хотите поиграть – присоединяйтесь🥹. https://t.me/+NWfJeTwL3WgyYjAy

9 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC131 views45 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

😈😈😈😈😈 «Ты с другим, а я погиб.»🖤🖤 ver: Северус Снейп, Лили Эванс, Джеймс Поттер. 🖤 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 539098229211611397014custom 53795769806917733969custom 53799086294764382269custom 53278054620856474895custom 53483076602717884044custom 52944447889452724762custom 53800359881416654482

8 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC132 views39 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Знаете, благодаря этой истории с Мариеттой я поняла насколько ахуенные люди в фандоме! Я за эти два дня сблизилась с Никой Бланш. Блять какая же она ахуенная!!!💘 Очень рада, что получилось пообщаться с ней🌷. Бэтти, ты крутышка!!!! Очень рада, что мы с тобой вчера пообщались и в целом, оказалось, что у нас немало общих интересов💖. Кики, Нази, Мирриада, Фелори, Маша, Дарси, Селеста, Сэнри и др. Восхищаюсь вами!!!💋 И

custom 532780546208564748915custom 537767718780773658113custom 54202278540109672449custom 53795769806917733962

8 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌹ВАС 🌹🌹🌹🌹 Спасибо большое каждому! Ценю вас и очень люблю🖇🖇🖇

custom 53800359881416654484custom 53776771878077365812custom 53795769806917733961custom 54202278540109672441

7 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC95 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @deblancharchive

🤩ои шладкие лапули, 🤩бедительная просьба!!! в комментариях к этому посту я скину вам голосовые и фотографии отмененной мариетты, если вдруг, вы когда-нибудь увидите в этом фандоме этого же человека, ОЧЕНЬ ПРОШУ кидайте это все мне в личку [@narkjets] или анонку [@blancheanonbot] таких омерзительных личностей действительно нужно остерегаться, из собственной зависти и гнильцы, она готова на ОЧЕНЬ многое, я считаю таки

31 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC371 views36 reactions7 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

😈😈😈😈😈 “baby my type 🌟” ver: Регулус Блэк🌟. 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟

custom 537990862947643822617custom 537957698069177339610custom 53278054620856474897custom 52944447889452724761custom 53776771878077365811

28 Jul 2026, 20:58 UTC371 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 «лучшее свидание.» ver: Сириус Блэк⬛. – материал в комментариях🤍. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 532780546208564748916custom 537767718780773658112custom 53799086294764382269custom 53800359881416654481custom 54202278540109672441

20 Jul 2026, 05:32 UTC529 views37 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 «Безопасность в темноте.»👨‍👧 ver: Том Реддл⬛. – материал в комментариях🖤. 🖤🖤 🖤🖤 🖤🖤

custom 537957698069177339618custom 53776771878077365819custom 53799086294764382268custom 52944447889452724761custom 54202278540109672441

15 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC536 views56 reactions8 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈 ➡️смотреть в комментариях💋. Убедительная просьба не писать ничего в комментариях, пока я не выложу все результаты🩷.

custom 542022785401096724421custom 532780546208564748917custom 537957698069177339614custom 53776771878077365812custom 53799086294764382262

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ssevverrusss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘶𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘦.” (@ssevverrusss), 187 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssevverrusss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.