Боже как мне нравится тренд на такие небрежные косы
❤5custom 54179803964092255684

Channel
@sskinnylegend
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
152subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519084132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sskinnylegend |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sskinnylegend |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 152 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 151 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 148 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 147 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 49.3% | |
| custom 5217554132633683176 | 7 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5300935755839854273 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| custom 5420187489908326914 | 6 | 8.96% | |
| custom 5233730869256016719 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| custom 5417980396409225568 | 4 | 5.97% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.49% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Боже как мне нравится тренд на такие небрежные косы
❤5custom 54179803964092255684
Мне что с утра пораньше кредит оформлять на это пальто?!
❤5🍓3custom 54201874899083269142
Балетки State Venice 💗
❤4custom 52175541326336831763🥰1
В продолжение рубрики: Pitkina на мужчинах😍 Им однозначно нужно запустить мужскую линейку
❤4custom 53009357558398542733
Все уже видели что Рози снялась для Эконики? С одной стороны я очень радуюсь что наши бренды становятся такими сильными и большими, но есть у меня ощущение что в Эконике произошли изменения. Последний год точно я практически не вижу чтобы этот бренд делал что-то интересное. По сути перевыпускается все +- одно и то же и если раньше я каждый месяц хотела там что-то купить, то сейчас я не нахожу для себя ничего такого ч…
❤4custom 54201874899083269142
Как круто на парне смотрятся вещи Pitkina 🍀
❤5custom 52337308692560167192
Такое красиво новое пространство у Fantome
❤6custom 52175541326336831764
Сделала для вас подборку что купить в 12 storeez на sale✨ Водолазка (у меня в гардеробе таких 2) Кожаное платье мини Жакет из твида Жилет для четвероного друга🥹 Вьетнамки Вельветовые брюки Топ
custom 52337308692560167193custom 53009357558398542733🍓2custom 54201874899083269142
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @sskinnylegend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Худая легенда” (@sskinnylegend), 152 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sskinnylegend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.