друзья! скоро мы начинаем) не упустите редкую возможность поучиться у одних из лучших специалистов в снг. будем вас с нетерпением ждать, всем удачи! 😜

Channel
sexychika🧞♂️🧛🏻🧙🏻♂️🧟♂️
@sskkholdup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,746subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001719950454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sskkholdup |
| Description | творческое объединение навигация по важной информации на канале происходит через закрепленные сообщения по всем вопросам можете обращатьсья ко мне в лс @sluccki чат - https://t.me/sexychikavfx |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sskkholdup |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 06:21 | 11,746 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:55 | 11,747 | +1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:50 | 11,746 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 11,741 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 11,749 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:57 | 11,762 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:38 | 11,751 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:10 | 11,754 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:40 | 11,752 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 11,753 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 11,756 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 11,757 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 11,762 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 11,760 | +8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 11,752 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:35 | 11,743 | +11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 11,732 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 11,745 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 11,747 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 11,753 | first reading |
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 65.8%
- avg views ÷ 11,746 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,730
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (23 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 123,610 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 356
- Videos
- 528
- Links
- 371
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12m 06s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (52.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
щас словил себя на мысли, что если чуваки считают, что сделать нейро видос и не получить ии-слоп в работе — практически невозможно, то это просто анскилл чуваки, которые из документации сиденса 2.5 читали только заглавие, а на всё остальное забивали болт. не тешьте себя, бюджет видоса выше — 2600 рублей. мне понадобилось 4 дня и всего две с половиной тысячи, чтобы избавиться от нейрослопа и сделать это. либо вы что-…
последнее время есть некоторые траблы с нашим ботом для скачивания видео, но мы уже разбираемся с этим! сегодня-завтра обнова на сайт выйдет, вы просили добавить в офис всяких новых приколюх, + бота пофиксим. в общем, как вы видите по скрину — тех. отдел не спит 🕺
друзья! напоминаю, что все еще есть возможность присоединиться к курсам от нашей команды. я также хочу ввести несколько очень подробных занятий по нейросетям, но, честно говоря, думаю, что слишком много нейрокреаторов появится. ну посмотрим в общем! если вы вдруг всегда хотели научиться монтировать, разбираться в программах или просто подтянуть свои навыки — welcome 😏
CHAIN OF SPIVINOID SMACK DA SHI 🕺
также вам подгрузил кадры с этой работки. если интересно — можете попробовать покрасить сами. кадры, примеры и настройки уже разместил в нашем канале. думаю, что найдутся авантюристы, которые будут очень рады таким подгонам! мало когда такие виды удастся покрасить, потыкать. 😊
друзья! если вы хотите потренироваться в цветокоррекции — скинул без проявки кадры в наш канал с нарезками. пользуйтесь, тренируйтесь, развивайтесь!
представьте, что каждому из вас дали вот именно тот проект, о котором вы так долго мечтали. какой бы проект это был и какие условия? я вот например всегда хотел бы работать в голливуде, но я слишком слабый для этого всего. 🕺
Soon. Ft. @inmywhitee
друзья! напоминаю, что открыта запись на наши курсы, мы в процессе реализации всей системы и (пока что) есть время всё обдумать и сделать выбор. отзывы и работы вы можете посмотреть в нашем канале или на нашем сайте chikaproject.ru также я делал пост по поводу того, что добавить на сайт — вы кучу всяких крутых предложений накидали, поэтому продолжаю его развивать. короче, я всё сказал 😖
circles - mac miller 🕺 я помню, как вам понравилась работа с good news. вы сами знаете, как я люблю снимать и практиковаться в цветокоррекции. и мой друг в момент, когда мы снимали, увидев кадры, сказал: ты обязан это выложить... я долго сомневался, но убедился, что он был прав 😊
ребята. если есть идеи, что ещё можно добавить на наш сайт: игрульки, разделы форума, возможности мессенджера и просто какие-то прикольные фичи — пишите в комментариях. я хочу дальше разрабатывать и двигать наш оч крутой сайт.
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @sskkholdup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @sskkholdup as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@trapozo1d · 2,3904 postsbuch
@bucchh · 3053 postsFryili
@FryiliEdit · 2142 postsctg
@ctgens · 832 postsSLAYER // Портфолио
@portfolioslayer · 112 postsСАПОГ
@sapogvfx · 4162 postsТвой Frolzz®
@Frolzzed · 361 post🎬ego.edit | монтажерик
@egoedit59 · 531 postлипикс
@lipix02 · 441 postmenyaklinit | why?
@menyaklinitmotion · 181 postoniseef
@oniseef · 2551 postЩеглов
@shchegglov · 541 postSLAYER PROD
@slayerprod · 541 postsoone | монтаж
@sooneedt · 281 postsquipixdddd
@squipixdtme · 3851 postсвики
@swwwwkk · 1661 postпиксели и приколы
@vainessss · 341 postЗаратустра
@zariktop228 · 1,5571 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@aayveee · 333 posts🎬ego.edit | монтажерик
@egoedit59 · 532 postsspivinoid
@spivinoid · 9232 postsalmavelle
@almavelle · 1111 postbergen
@bergeeen · 541 postdeadsand портфолио
@deadsandPORTFOLIO · 131 postТвой Frolzz®
@Frolzzed · 361 postМожно подинамичнее?
@montage_flare · 221 postONE ROOM (main)
@oneroommm1 · 3181 postSLAYER // Портфолио
@portfolioslayer · 111 postRap News 39
@rapnews39 · 511 postЭСБИ DJ | saintblock
@saintblockdj · 1391 postLocal g
@shecallmelocal · 4331 postsquipixdddd
@squipixdtme · 3851 post39 Records
@studio39rec · 4941 postVizutrix
@vizutrix · 1281 postyantero
@yanterooo · 551 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sskkholdup named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 6 November 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@oldsport_official · 20,477
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
@khsfilms · 35,713
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
@FreelStep · 36,530
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026
@after_effects_motion · 64,772
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
@listopadov_video · 22,889
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
@AETemp · 184,827
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
@iirepresent · 115,929
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@PremTemp · 49,027
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sexychika🧞♂️🧛🏻🧙🏻♂️🧟♂️” (@sskkholdup), 11,746 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sskkholdup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.