Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Смирнов. Голосовые и не только

Channel

Смирнов. Голосовые и не только

@sssmirnovmedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,923subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001978434955
TypeChannel
Username@sssmirnovmedia
Created25 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sssmirnovmedia

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,9238,0417,9826 August 2026 — 8,041 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,041 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,037 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,026 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,028 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,017 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,024 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,027 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,024 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,017 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,982 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,972 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,963 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,949 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,923 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 51 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,905–8,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 07:577,923-26
17 Sept 2026, 07:387,949-14
13 Sept 2026, 03:577,963-9
8 Sept 2026, 20:357,972-10
3 Sept 2026, 21:007,982-35
31 Aug 2026, 13:198,017-7
28 Aug 2026, 07:168,024-3
24 Aug 2026, 21:278,027+3
21 Aug 2026, 01:528,024-6
17 Aug 2026, 20:088,030+13
14 Aug 2026, 14:348,017-11
11 Aug 2026, 15:178,028+2
8 Aug 2026, 23:218,026-11
6 Aug 2026, 09:208,037-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,041no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:188,041first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 51 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6,415 reactions across 49 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2,01631.4%
⚡1,43822.4%
🔥77812.1%
🫡6309.82%
😱4056.31%
👀3014.69%
🐳2183.40%
🤬2063.21%
🤡1752.73%
☃771.20%
👻741.15%
💊630.982%
😡140.218%
🍾90.14%
🥱60.094%
🌭50.078%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
157
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 51 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sssmirnovmedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈2,480 views179 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Пропущу сегодня. И возможно не только сегодня

😱95🫡59❤‍🔥11⚡4🐳3🤬3☃2👀1

26 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC≈3,170 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

26 августа. Пресс-релиз Кремля по итогам поездки главы ЦРУ

⚡72🔥29❤‍🔥18🐳5👀4🤬2

25 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈3,440 views150 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

25 августа. Главный из ЦРУ залетел в Россию

☃73⚡36🔥21🫡7🐳4👀3🤬3💊2

24 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈4,100 views154 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сорри, первая часть просто не записалась Ну наверное не буду перезаписывать. Или попозже

😱78🫡29❤‍🔥21👀13🤡5💊3🤬3🐳2

23 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈5,390 views160 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

23 августа. На ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzападдном фронте без перемен

⚡109❤‍🔥28👀12🤡4🐳3😱3💊1

22 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,620 views75 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Стрим! Вопросы и донаты!

❤‍🔥59⚡5🤡5🐳3💊3

22 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈5,190 views80 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Скоро начнем https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbtHChHASLk

🔥55❤‍🔥9⚡8🤡5🐳2💊1

22 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈4,220 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Через 3,5 часа стрим Как обычно задавайте вопросы в комментариях к посту и в боте Ну и конечно можно и нужно поддержать стрим!

❤‍🔥64⚡7🤡4🐳2💊1

21 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC≈4,360 views135 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Пропущу сегодня Был в The Стриме, если не видели! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPtuSMdIPG8

🫡63🔥35🤡13❤‍🔥12⚡6👀2💊2☃1

20 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC≈9,300 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Давайте еще зафиксируем позицию Леонида Невзлина в ответ на признательные показания Блинова на предварительном следствии. Сорри за скриншоты от о-Соты. Это 2024 год

🫡68⚡10🔥5🤡4😡2💊1

20 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈4,790 views164 reactions7 Starsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

20 августа. Суд по нападению на Волкова. Невзлин наконец-то назван по фамилии

⚡96❤‍🔥33🔥16😱7🐳4👀4🤡3💊1

19 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈5,380 views222 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

19 июня (АВГУСТА). Шокирующая правда про концерт Канье Уэста

⚡100🔥44😱29🤡14👻13👀11🐳7🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @sssmirnovmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЗАХАРОВ
@zakharovchannel · 30,086
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Таня Ф.
@tanya_f · 21,172
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
ПЕВЧИХ
@mariapevchikh · 22,843
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Faridaily
@faridaily24 · 63,127
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
ШЕПЕЛИН
@ilyashepelin · 45,555
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Жданов
@ioannZH · 20,646
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Милов. Команда
@team_milov · 31,500
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
Leonid Volkov
@leonid_volkov · 22,132
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Котрикадзе иностранных дел
@k_kotrikadze · 21,843
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Conflict Intelligence Team
@CITeam · 87,680
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 98,277
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,531
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Карты и стрелочки
@arrowsmap · 71,093
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 113,471
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,829
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Денис Чужой про комедию
@fe_city_boy · 27,347
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,541
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
НА СВЯЗИ | Служба техподдержки
@na_svyazi_helpdesk · 26,386
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Мозг на полную
@full_brains · 22,856
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Сетевые Свободы
@NetFreedomsProject · 35,253
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q69582236 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelSergey Smirnov
DescriptionRussian journalist
X / Twitter@sssmirnov
YouTubeUC-okxtqx7St_dUMCRJABHZA

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Смирнов. Голосовые и не только” (@sssmirnovmedia), 7,923 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sssmirnovmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.