Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +829. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,208–20,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:22
20,228
-6
15 Sept 2026, 23:57
20,234
-6
14 Sept 2026, 09:18
20,240
-8
12 Sept 2026, 20:18
20,248
-14
10 Sept 2026, 19:41
20,262
-33
7 Sept 2026, 20:19
20,295
-19
4 Sept 2026, 21:35
20,314
-13
3 Sept 2026, 08:53
20,327
-11
2 Sept 2026, 04:33
20,338
-14
1 Sept 2026, 02:06
20,352
-6
31 Aug 2026, 02:42
20,358
-5
30 Aug 2026, 01:39
20,363
-4
28 Aug 2026, 22:04
20,367
-10
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
20,377
-13
26 Aug 2026, 03:34
20,390
-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:43
20,394
-11
24 Aug 2026, 02:13
20,405
-10
22 Aug 2026, 12:24
20,415
-13
21 Aug 2026, 02:05
20,428
-10
20 Aug 2026, 04:58
20,438
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 20,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,070
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
19 (18 June 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
4,140
Reactions total
72
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,073 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
695
64.8%
💯
113
10.5%
👏
106
9.88%
👍
99
9.23%
🔥
26
2.42%
😁
12
1.12%
🍾
8
0.746%
🤩
7
0.652%
🙏
3
0.28%
⚡
1
0.093%
👌
1
0.093%
🤗
1
0.093%
🥰
1
0.093%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
THE DON’TS & DOS OF CLAIMING REFUNDS USING THE DIRECT DEBIT GUARANTEE
What a great time to be alive!
Lots of people have not only stopped funding the scam, that are household bills - in fact, I don’t know many people who are still paying them - but they’re also claiming back refunds on everything they’ve ever paid.
Our channel is now on £5,557,665.20 as a collective in refunds, and we started this five and a half …
IN-PERSON EVENT & ZOOM DATES
There are no in-person or online group events until September and the next event is Essex, in about 5 weeks. Limited availability for 121s until September. The only dates I have scheduled for 121s are next Monday and Tuesday, Aug 24th and 25th.
IN-PERSON EVENTS
Tues 29th September
BRENTWOOD, ESSEX
6.30-9.30pm £60pp
ZOOMS
121s
(30 mins £65/1 hour £100 video call, or £100 for 15 mins +…
ENERGY FLOWS WHERE ATTENTION GOES
Ever wondered why the news channels are 24/7, and largely promoting fear/negative stories?
Whatever people focus on, they get more of.
It really is that simple.
Those who control the media (and I include mainstream news, social media, alternative news, advertising, films etc.) massively benefit, by keeping everyone else weak, stressed, dumbed down, living in fear and at a complet…
MASSIVE COUNCIL TAX REFUND OF £9500 TAKES US OVER £5.5M
And, for all the cynics and the non-believers, Enca - the lady who’s managed to challenge the notoriously difficult (but not impossible) Barclays Bank - has never even paid me a penny.
She’s never been to an event, or had a call with me - she SIMPLY READ ALL THE FREE CONTENT IN HERE, which I’ve been putting out into the ether for 5.5 years.
The grand total of…
THE INSANITY OF THOSE CRYING OVER DATA CENTRES
Just STFU about data centres, please.
Or do something productive - like deleting your Meta accounts.
End of.
Must be the same people who whine about digital ID - on their “smart” phones.
#datacenters
#datacentre
#meta
#digitalid
#staceysworldrocks
CREDIT CARD REFUNDS OF £1200 & ENERGY BILL REFUND OF £6900
I had a 121 Zoom call with Karim, in Brighton, yesterday lunchtime and by 7pm, he’d had two separate credit card refunds of £535 and £700. I think that’s the quickest I’ve ever seen anyone obtain refunds after we’ve had a call. Very well played, mate. 👏
Also, a well done to Jo, who I met at the Bedford event recently. She managed to get nearly £7000 refunde…
IN-PERSON EVENT & ZOOM DATES
There are no in-person or online group events until September. Limited availability for 121s until September, also. I’ve just added some last-minute slots for next week and the week after.
NOTE: If you’re intending to come to the Essex event, then book in good time or I will reschedule. Everyone tried to book on the day/the day before last month, and I’d already put it back to September…
❤15👍2
Signed Stacey
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @staceysworldrocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@staceysworldrocks edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stacey's World Rocks” (@staceysworldrocks), 20,228 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staceysworldrocks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.