Trezor Signer Spoofer | t.me/stackframe FULL signer impersonation kit for Trezor Suite. VIC's wallet displays your identity with a green "Verified Service" badge. They confirm on device because every trust signal checks out. * Sign arbitrary messages, transactions with your to/value/data, EIP-712 typed data for permits * Account addresses and device model, firmware, PIN state pulled on page visit * Panel with per-…

Channel
Stackframe MARKET | web3/crypto (dApp, DeFI, DAO, etc)
@stackframemarket
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,590subscribers
-35,763 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003803793422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @stackframe @stackframemarket |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 9 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 78 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stackframemarket |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 17,590 | no change |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 17,590 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 17,592 | no change |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 17,592 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 17,596 | no change |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 17,596 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 17,600 | no change |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 17,600 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 17,602 | no change |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 17,602 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 17,604 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 17,606 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 17,608 | no change |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 17,608 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 17,617 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 17,618 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 17,622 | no change |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 17,622 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 17,626 | no change |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:44 | 17,626 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 21s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
@Module & @Stackframe | Ledger Wallet 0day (In-App) — $x,xxx Hello everyone, we're releasing a Ledger Wallet 0day that renders a full recovery flow natively inside the application. The target remains within Ledger Wallet for the duration of the session. * Features: — In-app execution via Ledger Wallet — Source code included (non-obfuscated) — Custom overlay templates available on request * Requirements: — Public h…
Bitgo(.)com VM [Captchaless] — $1,500 This tool checks whether or not an email is registered on Bitgo(.)com. * Features: — 4000+ CPM — Completely captchaless. — No false-positives whatsoever. — Caching to prevent VM'ing the same line twice. — Fully unobfuscated source code with all endpoints. * Requirements: — Rotating residential proxies For more information, join @module or PM @lmaowtf17
Funnel | t.me/stackframe Local desktop sweeper, 4 families. Paste seed(s)/key(s), see balances on 10 chains, funnel to wallet(s) in one pass. no ENS/emails/exchange, seeds + raw keys only, public nodes wired, private RPC optional. * Auto-family: one hex key maps to EVM + Tron + BTC + SOL * 3 EVM paths, slip-10 SOL, bip84/44 BTC, Tron * Batch import: paste or file .txt/.csv/.key/.json * Multicall3 EVM + to…
Stansberry VM | t.me/stackframe VM for Stansberry. Accurately report valid accounts from a list of emails, captchaless, browser-native WAF, no solver or creds needed. Target is never emailed. Works best with rotating residential proxies. However it scales hard on worker count. * Definite registered / unregistered verdict per email * ~3k (single, no proxies) - 15k–20k+ CPM multi-worker + proxy * Session ca…
Stripe(.)com - PII Disclosure Vulnerability | @valhalla0day Functionality: • 6k CPM with 10 threads • Captchaless Disclosure: • Phone number hints • Linked payment methods • 2FA • & More Price: $2,500 (one-time). What you get with the purchase: • Full source code • Step-by-step setup guide • Support with any issues Middleman welcome, @cupid or @scrizon PM: @valhallaadmin2
Okay bro, which dipshit netdumped on bots to bot this channel & @module G.
This is being sold by @lmaowtf17 & @moschata.
@Module | Trezor 1-Click Signer Takeover — $4,000 Hello all, we're releasing an in-app trezor-focused EVM signer takeover kit. Single-click delivery into the native desktop wallet flow; once the target confirms, you hold an active signing session on supported EVM chains. * Features: — One-click handoff into the in-app confirmation flow — EVM signer takeover (personal sign, typed data, transactions) — Customizable p…
Keystone 1-click 0day | Mass-Phishing * Premade & fully customisable. * Update the message keyst.one customers see and be able to delete it from their tables completely. * Message text, url, time etc are all controlled by you. You could point users to "keystone.support" if you wanted to, for example. $x,xxx - $xx,xxx+ (offer, quicksale) | @moschata PATCHED - I'll try and see if there's another method. NOTE: ON…
OneKey VM | t.me/stackframe VM for OneKey. Accurately report valid OneKey accounts (cloud backup, keyless, prime subscription, etc) from a list of emails. This VM sort of requires rotating proxies. No captcha solver or credentials needed. * Definite registered / unregistered verdict per email, written to a results file. * ~6,000-25,000+ CPM, scales with worker count (64-256+ workers for example). * Caching…
UPDATE: Sorry I've been away for a week on a small vacation. Back up and running now if anyone has any inquiries or requests.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @stackframemarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@stackframemarket edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
When you see someone post a P1 ad what would you prefer to see?
- $$$$ (~$2-5k) for source31%
- $$-$$$/1k lines24%
- $$$$ (~1-2k+) for full-time access22%
- a combination22%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@stackframemarket named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stackframe MARKET | web3/crypto (dApp, DeFI, DAO, etc)” (@stackframemarket), 17,590 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stackframemarket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.