Channel
@stakano5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,646subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001850985961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stakano5 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stakano5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:26 | 2,646 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 2,650 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 2,643 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 2,635 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 2,634 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 2,632 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,631 | +16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 2,615 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 2,610 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 2,610 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,346 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 899 | 66.8% | |
| 🔥 | 191 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5895755887015891448 | 124 | 9.21% | |
| custom 5386540467003364249 | 76 | 5.65% | |
| custom 5386779228530315937 | 37 | 2.75% | |
| custom 5384305756864552017 | 19 | 1.41% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Забыла написать! Пополнила «твою полку» в Чебоксарах, там снова значки, акрил, стикеры и открытки! + положила коробки-сюрпризы с кулонами для тех, кому сложно выбрать ☝️ зато сразу с упаковкой
custom 538654046700336424950custom 538677922853031593728custom 53843057568645520176
Друзья! 7 августа в 19:00 состоится вернисаж персональной выставки чувашско-петербургской художницы Поли Марко «Цветолюди: приданое». В своих работах художница обращается к теме поиска собственной идентичности сквозь призму традиционного чувашского текстильного искусства, культуры и мифологии. Обращение Поли Марко к семейному приданому — оммаж на вышивки своей прабабушки — даёт рождение уникальному персонажу Цвето…
custom 538654046700336424926custom 538430575686455201713custom 53867792285303159379
вот и думайте
❤133🔥18
Пока изразцы только делаются - хочу узнать, какие расцветки вас интересуют! А я может поищу еще глазурей под них ✌️
❤144🔥19
Друзья, выложила почти все остатки изделий в канал с наличием https://t.me/tktrlki
❤31🔥11custom 589575588701589144810
У Андрея сегодня день рождения! Я уже писала, что он мне лепит очень много изделий, а я расписываю!! Молодец короче Вот такой тортик ему заказала! 🫶🫡
❤141🔥39custom 589575588701589144835
Всем спасибо, что приходили на пикфест в Питере и в Москве, не привыкла получать столько отдачи…….мы почти сразу в поезд - и в родные чебупели. Наличие выложу попозже, ближайший месяц новинок не будет ТОЧНО
❤79🔥25custom 589575588701589144817
Второй день на пикфесте за 29 столиком
❤103🔥6
Я сегодня милашкаrrr приходите за 29 столик
❤99🔥29custom 589575588701589144825
Сейчас буду сильно спеша оформлять новые обвесы :(((
❤84🔥22custom 589575588701589144821
Вышли новые изразцы! Их все еще немного, потому что мы физически не успели больше 💀 Поделю на два дня
❤85🔥22custom 589575588701589144816
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @stakano5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐭𝐮𝐤𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐚𝐢 ✸” (@stakano5), 2,646 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stakano5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.