Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for StalinHDTV

Channel

StalinHDTV

@stalinhdtv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,510subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923765411
TypeChannel
Username@stalinhdtv
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stalinhdtv

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5107,6607,5857 August 2026 — 7,660 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,660 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,657 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,654 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,649 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,645 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,640 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,629 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,620 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,613 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,601 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,591 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,585 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,570 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,554 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,545 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,542 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,537 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,532 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,525 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,521 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,523 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,519 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,510 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,488–7,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 14:007,510-9
2 Nov 2026, 08:567,519-4
30 Oct 2026, 11:507,523+2
27 Oct 2026, 01:467,521-4
23 Oct 2026, 16:207,525-7
20 Oct 2026, 23:067,532-5
18 Oct 2026, 00:587,537-5
15 Oct 2026, 01:297,542-3
11 Oct 2026, 22:207,545-9
5 Oct 2026, 07:167,554-16
27 Sept 2026, 05:427,570-15
17 Sept 2026, 21:157,585-6
14 Sept 2026, 03:207,591-10
10 Sept 2026, 14:417,601-12
5 Sept 2026, 04:597,613-7
1 Sept 2026, 12:367,620-9
29 Aug 2026, 18:387,629-11
26 Aug 2026, 15:047,640-5
20 Aug 2026, 03:037,645-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:387,649first reading

Engagement

256 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 7,510 subscribers
Avg views / post
781
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 256 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held256 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total55,474
Reactions total2,704
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 00:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,200
Videos
≈1,580
Links
≈2,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 41s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,327 reactions across 256 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,52342.3%
🤣1,47617.7%
🔥8319.98%
💯7939.52%
👍7498.99%
❤2042.45%
👏931.12%
🥰881.06%
😢820.985%
🤔780.937%
🫡720.865%
😨360.432%
🤬270.324%
😭260.312%
👀240.288%
🤯240.288%
😱220.264%
✍210.252%
😎180.216%
🤗170.204%
19 further kinds1231.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 256 of the 256 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 256 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:49 UTC368 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍13😁11

6 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC461 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣25😭5😁1

6 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC529 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @stalinatorchanelPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯33😁8🔥4

6 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC539 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁29❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC599 views47 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣41😁6

6 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC613 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥15💯11👀4👏1

6 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC685 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯24😁14👏3🤨1

6 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC551 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @klimzhukoffPhoto

К вопросу о подвижности латного доспеха на примере германского гарнитура 1480-х из музея Уоллеса. Со спины хорошо видно, как работает задняя часть наплечника, где пластины соединяются жëстко шарнирами. В центре и переднем секторе детали собраны на внутренних ремнях, гарантируя максимальную свободу. В общем, двигать рукой удобно, но ограничения есть.

👍16🔥4

6 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC551 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @klimzhukoffPhoto

Всë-таки нечто занятное в стиле костюмных доспехов позднего Ренессанса. Ну можно же было закрыть заднюю полусферу не менее эффективно, но с куда меньшим эпатажем! Однако ж нет. Надо было вот так, с точной имитацией полупопиц, совпадая с модой гражданского костюма. При том, что все эти пластины обладали отличной взаимной подвижностью, несли сложную закалку, которая позволяла делать их довольно тонкими и лëгкими. Фото…

🤣19🔥13😁1

6 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC691 views41 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁34🔥3🤯3🙈1

6 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC673 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Когда закончился век кольчуги и начался пластинчатого доспеха https://youtube.com/shorts/tpTCJ6hT1XE

👍8🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 256 posts we hold for @stalinhdtv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“StalinHDTV” (@stalinhdtv), 7,510 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stalinhdtv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.