Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for в моей голове все живы

Channel

в моей голове все живы

@starchaseme

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,131subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001785434658
TypeChannel
Username@starchaseme
Created20 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/starchaseme

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1312,1832,1576 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,182 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,177 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,173 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,169 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,164 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,162 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,154 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,147 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,144 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,141 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,131 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,123–2,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:022,131-10
9 Sept 2026, 19:002,141-3
4 Sept 2026, 10:202,144-3
1 Sept 2026, 02:462,147-7
29 Aug 2026, 05:552,154-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:242,162-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:272,164-5
19 Aug 2026, 14:232,169-4
13 Aug 2026, 02:232,173-4
9 Aug 2026, 20:562,177-5
7 Aug 2026, 02:212,182-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:202,183no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:482,183first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,443 reactions across 21 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76753.2%
😭17211.9%
❤‍🔥14710.2%
💔926.38%
🔥896.17%
💋815.61%
💘422.91%
😢231.59%
🤩120.832%
🥰120.832%
🕊30.208%
🤡30.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC238 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

искренним удивлением для меня навсегда останется тот факт, что лаба полюбилась вам больше берлинского ангела почему?

💔29🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC544 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

новая глава <уайбла> уже на фикбуке! 📷 Открыв один глаз, Чимин видит пляж и домик. Он знает, что в кадре вот-вот появятся Робби и Сесилия, а Брайони вот-вот скажет, что подарила им счастливый финал, которого лишила их в действительности. Сердце привычно сдавливает где-то между ребрами. Это жестоко. Юнги молчит. Чимин знает, что если повернется, то почти наверняка увидит на его лице дорожки слез. И решает не делать

14💘7🕊1

1 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC788 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

всех причастных с месяцем гранта!!! cr

😭59😢23💔14💘103

30 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC775 views142 reactionsread 7 August 2026

рассказывала жене лор моей любимой кружки по вульфстару, и она пришла к выводу, что сириус был настолько влюблен в ремуса, что в какой-то из реальностей он бы взял на себя его микрозайм

❤‍🔥7639💋27

19 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,160 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ого, гуглдокс спойлерит планы на отпуск

😭373🕊2💋1

19 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,100 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

пишу штучкус с дедлайном. не ведитесь, что он бедолага, там в основе комедия лежит (романтическая!) Когда-то, когда Юнги был совсем маленьким, а мир — огромным и ярким, Юнги думал, что так он пытается объяснить себе то, что ему отказываются объяснять взрослые. Старая бордовая нитка, шершавая и колющаяся на вид, как пряжа, из которой бабушка обычно вязала ему свитера, тянулась от ее мизинца к мизинцу дедушки. Бабушка

🥰123😭1

16 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,010 views174 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лили: поздравляю, золото и серебро по Международной Олимпиаде Придурков ваше. Джеймс: Сириус: Джеймс: а золото у кого?

99💋40❤‍🔥29🔥3🤡3

15 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,040 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

сегодня очень долго смотрела на этот тикток в ленте. грустно репостнула

65😭3🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC900 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @homeofjegulusVideo

Человечество больше не знало такой прайм эры, как быть в фандоме мародеров в 2022 году.

83❤‍🔥18💘9🔥3😭3

11 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,030 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

хотела сказать, что довольна, а теперь смотрю на этого бедни-одиноки чонгука, присобачить чи к нему кого

39💘16🔥11💋1

11 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,030 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

чем ближе выход фильма тем сильнее болит на сердце от этих тиктоков дурацких cr (но не риверс)

💔49😭267

5 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,820 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Может, это одна из тех девчонок на соседнем ряду? Или тот парень на крайнем сиденье? Или… нет. Только не он, слишком старый. И не она, она с парнем, неловко как-то получится. Сбоку раздался какой-то невнятный всхлип. На экране Роуз просила Джека нарисовать ее, как одну из француженок. И вот зачем всхлипывать? Регулус присмотрелся к парню возле себя. Парень как парень. В огромных очках, лохматый, в какой-то смешной

84🔥25💋11❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @starchaseme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Poll141 voters

соц опрос окончен

  1. academic rivals лили36%
  2. academic rivals доркас28%
  3. academic rivals марлин23%
  4. friends to lovers лили43%
  5. friends to lovers доркас14%
  6. friends to lovers марлин37%
  7. forced marriage лили18%
  8. forced marriage доркас30%
  9. forced marriage марлин24%

The shares total 253%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTCAnonymous Poll160 voters

я надеюсь суть вопроса интуитивно ясна…

  1. fwb регулус18%
  2. fwb барти27%
  3. fwb эван18%
  4. hurt/comfort регулус60%
  5. hurt/comfort барти18%
  6. hurt/comfort эван14%
  7. exes to lovers регулус24%
  8. exes to lovers барти27%
  9. exes to lovers эван30%

The shares total 236%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

extremely out of context но что бы вы выбрали?..

  1. fake date сириус35%
  2. fake date ремус23%
  3. fake date джеймс25%
  4. slow burn сириус29%
  5. slow burn ремус51%
  6. slow burn джеймс18%
  7. enemies to lovers сириус36%
  8. enemies to lovers ремус25%
  9. enemies to lovers джеймс27%

The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“в моей голове все живы” (@starchaseme), 2,131 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starchaseme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.