Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stardust‧₊˚✧

Channel

Stardust‧₊˚✧

@starrr_dusttt

Not marked by Telegram, checked 9 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

382subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002227248743
TypeChannel
Username@starrr_dusttt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/starrr_dusttt

Growth

382469425.56 August 2026 — 469 subscribers6 August 2026 — 469 subscribers6 August 2026 — 463 subscribers12 August 2026 — 451 subscribers19 August 2026 — 444 subscribers25 August 2026 — 425 subscribers1 September 2026 — 416 subscribers10 September 2026 — 410 subscribers18 September 2026 — 382 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 44 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 369–482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:58382-28
10 Sept 2026, 05:37410-6
1 Sept 2026, 17:28416-9
25 Aug 2026, 16:55425-19
19 Aug 2026, 10:12444-7
12 Aug 2026, 23:38451-12
6 Aug 2026, 20:48463-6
6 Aug 2026, 19:03469no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:03469first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2184.0%
💘416.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC6 viewsread 6 August 2026

تو رو در بایستی گیر کرده بودین؟😭

6 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026

از وقتی اینو گفتم چهار نفر لفت دادن-

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بچه ها دیگه نمیتونم اینجا زیاد فعالیت کنم مثل قبل یکم زیادی سرم شلوغه پاک نمیکنم اینجارو چون دلم نمیاد😭 میزارم بمونه من تو دیلیم فعالیت میکنم اگه دوست داشتین بیاید اونجا پیشم🍓

🍓1

26 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @afterthecup

خیلی دوست داشتم از اون دسته آدم‌هایی باشم که همیشه درحال نقاشی‌ان و نقاشی‌هاشون سبک خاص خودشون رو داره.

🍓1

26 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC144 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

کاش دیوارای اتاقم سبز بودن-

🍓8

22 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC172 viewsread 6 August 2026

وقتی به گیاهای سبزم نگاه میکنم که سرشار از زندگین یه کم بهشون حسودیم میشه...

19 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC270 viewsread 6 August 2026

𝐓𝐨 𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠. Alice in borderland🎥

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @starrr_dusttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dizney💜
@Dizney_Moviez · 44,793
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stardust‧₊˚✧” (@starrr_dusttt), 382 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starrr_dusttt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.