Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for StartAndroid

Channel

StartAndroid

@startandroid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,446subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005272660
TypeChannel
Username@startandroid
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/startandroid

Growth

9,4469,4879,466.55 August 2026 — 9,487 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,487 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,486 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,477 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,474 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,473 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,476 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,471 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,470 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,463 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,453 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,446 subscribers5 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 28 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,440–9,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:259,446-7
31 Aug 2026, 01:139,453-10
28 Aug 2026, 00:039,463-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:219,470-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:139,471-5
18 Aug 2026, 14:289,476+3
15 Aug 2026, 20:369,473-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:169,474-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:029,477-9
7 Aug 2026, 00:169,486-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,487no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:099,487first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 9,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.505%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held23 (27 March 202628 August 2026)
Views total8,520
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8927.6%
👍8125.1%
🎉4814.9%
💩288.67%
👎206.19%
🔥206.19%
🤔144.33%
🤡72.17%
😢41.24%
😁30.929%
👏20.619%
👨‍💻20.619%
😴20.619%
🌚10.31%
🐳10.31%
💯10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @startandroid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.35%
1 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,820
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,140
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FxJsZSctmMjPLC7P72KnZ5o13uuEuDJ118 June 202618 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,020 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Что нового в Jetpack Compose August '26 (2026.08.00) - Breaking Changes - Graphics: Mesh Gradients, Wide Color Gamut & HDR Support - Styles - Runtime Optimizations: Keyed SideEffect Overload - Animation: Interactive Two-Stage Transitions - Text, Input & Platform Integrations: Editable Text Formatting, Text Selection, Credential Manager Integration - Layout Enhancements: Named Areas in Grid Layout - Performance - Tes

1

27 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,460 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💩171👍1

19 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,500 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Выпуск подкаста Android Developer Backstage про AI Android AI Tools: Vibe coding, sub-agents, and the Android CLI - Introduction to AI tools - Building with Android CLI - Sub-agents and parallel processing - Managing code with the change review tool - Testing app features with Journeys - Extending capabilities with Android skills - How development is evolving with agents - Keeping humans in the loop #android #ai

3🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈3,540 views19 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Если вдруг давно ничего не читали по Compose - краткий обзор нескольких полезных новшеств #android #compose https://proandroiddev.com/stop-writing-compose-like-its-2024-10-recent-updates-every-android-developer-should-know-302c23b61e36

7👍6🔥3🐳1👨‍💻1💯1

30 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC≈4,360 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉40👎5💩4😁31👨‍💻1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈5,080 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Что нового в Android Studio Quail 2: - Multi-tasking with parallel chats - Memory leak detection with LeakCanary - App Quality Insights agent integration - Quality & stability improvements #androidstudio https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/android-studio-quail-2-stable-features.html

3

17 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈5,110 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍7💩32🤡1

14 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈4,070 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Видео с советами по оптимизации производительности приложений (I/O Connect ‘26) 0:00 - Introduction 2:58 - Memory on Android 9:16 - App memory limits in Android 17 10:12 - In-field monitoring and profiling 15:24 - R8 and memory optimization 20:34 - Bitmaps and image management 27:48 - App resilience and Low memory killer daemon 30:24 - Track app kills and handle memory pressure 33:47 - Recap of app optimization tech

6😢1

24 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,860 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Как Gradle решает какие модули пересобирать Gradle compiles Kotlin to bytecode, uses the ASM library to strip out all private internals leaving only the public skeleton, then SHA-256 hashes that skeleton. If the hash matches the cached value, dependent modules are skipped entirely — only a public signature change produces a different hash and triggers downstream recompilation. #android #gradle #kotlin https://pr

5

19 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC≈4,270 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Видео о том, что такое Android Skills и как их использовать #android #ai https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZLQVlLgTDU

👍71

18 Jun 2026, 11:02 UTC≈3,820 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FxJsZSctmMjPLC7P72KnZ5o13uuEuDJPhoto

Как выглядит современный SDK для монетизации приложений Недавно Яндекс выпустил новую версию SDK для своей рекламной сети. Обновление действительно впечатляет, потому что подумали обо всём: - облегчили SDK для Android на 30%. А чем компактнее SDK, тем быстрее скачивается и меньше весит ваше приложение. Следовательно — выше конверсия в установку; - добавили поддержку Kotlin Coroutines и Swift async/await; - настроил

👎13🤡64👍4🔥1

10 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC≈4,010 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вышел Kotlin 2.4.0 Что нового: - Language: Stable context parameters, explicit backing fields, and multiple features for annotation use-site targets. - Standard library: Stabilized support for the UUID API and support for checking sorted order. - Kotlin/JVM: Support for Java 26 and annotations in metadata enabled by default. - Kotlin/Native: Support for Swift packages as dependencies, updates on Swift export, and th

4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @startandroid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“StartAndroid” (@startandroid), 9,446 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startandroid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.