Channel
@startingover
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,579subscribers
-74 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001059966660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startingover |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startingover |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 9,579 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 9,584 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 9,591 | -11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 9,602 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 9,612 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 9,614 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 9,620 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 9,626 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 9,625 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 9,627 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 9,638 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 9,643 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 9,653 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 9,653 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 5 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (5 December 2025 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,555 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,857 reactions across 42 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 800 | 43.1% | |
| 👍 | 733 | 39.5% | |
| 👌 | 151 | 8.13% | |
| 👏 | 58 | 3.12% | |
| 💔 | 41 | 2.21% | |
| 🕊 | 24 | 1.29% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 0.808% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 0.485% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 0.431% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.323% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.323% | |
| 🤷♂ | 4 | 0.215% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.108% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بزرگترین کمک به دیگران، این نیست که راه را به آنها نشان دهی؛ این است که باور کنی خودشان میتوانند راه را پیدا کنند. کمکِ واقعی، یعنی آنقدر به کسی اعتماد کنی که او به خودش اعتماد کند. @startingover
👍6❤4🤝1
آموزش بدون تلاش، مثل دیدن نقشهای است که هرگز روی آن قدم نمیزنی، و تلاش بدون آموزش، مثل دویدن در مسیری است که نمیدانی کجا ختم میشود. ترکیب این دو است که آدم را از «خواستن» به «شدن» میرساند. اگر امروز چیزی یاد گرفتی، برایت کافی نیست؛ آن را تمرین کن، در زندگیت پیادهاش کن و سپس از آن عبور کن تا به چیز تازهتری برسی. بودن در مسیر رشد، یعنی همین، یعنی هیچوقت کامل نشدن و هیچوقت از یادگیری دست نکشیدن. @startingover
👍4❤1
فرصتها را نه با چشم، که با دست باید دید و ساخت. هر روز، هر لحظه، میتوانی انتخابی کنی که مسیرت را برای همیشه عوض کند. امید یعنی در تاریکی قدم برداشتن، و شجاعت یعنی حتی با لرزش دستها، ادامه دادن. کسی که هر روز، حتی یک قدم، برای خودش برمیدارد، از بسیاری که درجا میزنند، جلوتر است. @startingover
❤12👏7👍1
آموزش، فقط جمع کردن اطلاعات نیست؛ جرقهای است که ذهن را از خواب بیدار میکند. هر بار که چیزی تازه یاد میگیری، در واقع لایهای از نادانی را کنار میزنی و خودت را به نسخهای بهتر تبدیل میکنی. اما آموزش واقعی وقتی رخ میدهد که آنچه را آموختهای، به عمل تبدیل کنی. ارزش یک معلم، به اندازهی ارزش شاگردی است که گوش میدهد، و ارزش یک کتاب، به اندازهی جرقهای است که در ذهن خواننده میزند. @startingover
❤13👌3👍3
«زندگی، ۱۰٪ اتفاقاتی است که برایت میافتد و ۹۰٪ واکنش تو به آنهاست.» ✍چارلز آر. سویندل @startingover
❤22👍4👌1👎1🤝1😢1
شجاعت، فقط در میدانِ جنگ نیست. گاهی شجاعت، یعنی وسطِ یک جمع، سکوت کنی. یعنی در برابرِ کسی که دوستش داری، بگویی «نه». یعنی از جادهای که همه میروند، برگردی و راهِ خودت را بروی. @startingover
❤17👍10👌2
دیروز، یک نسخهی قدیمی از تو بود. امروز، فرصتِ نوشتنِ نسخهای جدید. و فردا، فقط یک برگِ سفیدِ دیگر. @startingover
👍24❤14💯1
گاهی عقبنشینی، شجاعترین حرکتِ ممکن است. چون برای شروع دوباره، باید اول، از جای اشتباه دور شوی. @startingover
👍24❤8💯1
تلاشِ واقعی، وقتی معنا پیدا میکند که هیچکس نگاهت نمیکند، اما تو باز هم، سرِ جادهای ایستادهای که هیچکس نمیرود. @startingover
❤24👍15👏4💯2
صداقت، یعنی آنقدر با خودت راست باشی که حتی وقتی هیچکس نمیبیند، باز هم همان کسی باشی که ادعا میکنی. @startingover
❤20👍17🕊5😢1
انرژی، فقط یک احساس نیست؛ یک انتخاب است. و هر روز با اولین نَفَست، انتخاب میکنی که بسوزی یا بدرخشی. @startingover
❤18👍7👏4
کسی که در تاریکی قدم میزند، مطمئن نیست که راه درست را میرود. اما اگر منتظر روشنایی بماند، هیچوقت حرکت نمیکند. موفقیت، یعنی همان قدمی که در تاریکی برمیداری. @startingover
👍31❤14🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @startingover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Starting over(شروعی دوباره)” (@startingover), 9,579 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startingover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.