Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stas Tyrkin Inc.

Channel

Stas Tyrkin Inc.

@stastyrkin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,815subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796309120
TypeChannel
Username@stastyrkin
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stastyrkin

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8141,8201,8177 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,817 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,817 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,815 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,814 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,815 subscribers1,8157 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:371,815+1
12 Sept 2026, 05:591,814-1
8 Sept 2026, 07:151,815-2
2 Sept 2026, 18:461,817-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:451,820+2
28 Aug 2026, 12:531,818+1
22 Aug 2026, 01:441,817-1
18 Aug 2026, 13:341,818-2
15 Aug 2026, 04:191,820+2
8 Aug 2026, 04:361,818-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:161,820no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:061,820first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

633 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31049.0%
🔥15825.0%
😁7712.2%
👍304.74%
🤔294.58%
🥰121.90%
👏71.11%
😱71.11%
😢30.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC339 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Одним из главных событий кинофестиваля, славящегося своими ретроспективами, стал цикл фильмов под названием «Красное и черное: голливудские левые и черный список» (Red & Black — Hollywood Left and the Blacklist). В цикл вошли как фильмы 1940-50-х годов, созданные в темные времена маккартизма, так и более поздние картины, осмысляющие этот уникальный голливудский период, когда американские кинодеятели подверглись небыв

13

24 May 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,300 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Какая ужасная мизансцена!» — сказал Павликовский, которого по сути оставили без награды. «Где мой приз?» — кричал он, но приз утащили испанцы. Лично у меня другой вопрос. Мне хотелось бы поинтересоваться у жюри: что для них лучшая режиссура? https://style.rbc.ru/impressions/6a1292c59a79473787d18641

11👍5🤔3🥰1

23 May 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,430 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Каннский конкурс был раздутым и изнурительным - треть фильмов имели продолжительность под 3 часа. Кто бы уже дал по рукам демиургам, авторам этих бесформенных, рыхлых, почти всегда невыносимых фильмов? Я понимаю зачем тот или иной из них нужен программе, но смотреть это - мука. Огромный хронометраж был оправдан только в одном случае - в выдающемся, как я считаю, фильме Хамагути. Итак, из 21 фильма конкурса (с одного

🔥2220👍6🤔4😁3🥰1😢1😱1

20 May 2026, 20:04 UTC≈1,190 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На подходе к фестивалю какой-то русский блоггер записывает какой-то подкаст и завершает его такими словами: «Но возможно я просто быдло и ничего не понял, тогда вы меня не слушайте». Значит, все-таки что-то понимает!

😁2615👏4🤔1

20 May 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разговорчики о банальности зла порядком прискучили и, может быть, пора посмотреть на ситуацию с позиций вечности, с высоты древнегреческих мифов? Минотавр — как известно, критское чудовище с телом человека и головой быка, живущее в Лабиринте. В мифе его убивает Тесей, но в пространстве картины Звягинцева Тесея на него не находится, ибо Глеб Александрович сам убьет кого хочешь. https://style.rbc.ru/impressions/6a0d771

17

18 May 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,080 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вы спросите: но какая роль в этой мужской истории отводится Скарлетт Йоханссон? Правильно, в самый неподходящий момент ее героиня заболевает раком. В этом месте одна каннская зрительница вскочила с места и с громкой тирадой на итальянском языке выбежала из зала. Наверное, ей понадобится психотерапевт. https://style.rbc.ru/impressions/6a0ab0eb9a794723e3d6a62e

7😁5😱3

15 May 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,530 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Хамагути кажется снял шедевр. «Внезапно». Но так называется и его фильм. Говорит человек, который дважды ушел с его Drive My Car, сначала в Каннах, потом в Художественном. А тут не только досидел все 3 часа 16 минут, но, как Виржини Эфира, утирая слезу, остался ему аплодировать. Вроде снимает о том, о чем снимают здесь все через одного: жизнь, болезнь, умирание, Альцгеймер, рак, адаптация, принятие, нормальность, не

32🔥32🤔3

14 May 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,020 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как и в фильме Андреа Арнольд «Птица» (он, по всей видимости, произвел на Балагова сильное впечатление), в «Варенье из бабочек» Барри Кеоган выступает в роли кидалта (kid + adult) — незрелого парня, у которого самого уже подрос ребенок и приходится как-то по-новому строить свои отношения и с ним, и с окружающим миром. Но еще одна утопленная в быту история взросления не взлетает, в отличие от «Птицы», хотя в ней прису

16👍10

13 May 2026, 11:17 UTC999 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На открытии показали несмешную французскую комедию «Электрическая Венера» Пьера Сальвадори, который, мягко говоря, никогда не был любимцем фестивалей — ни Каннского, ни всех остальных. И можно понять почему: в активе этого режиссера такие произведения, как «Банда супергероев», «Роковая красотка», «Случайный роман». В этот раз он тоже не разочаровал: вниманию зрителя предлагается опус на чисто опереточный сюжет, котор

🔥135🥰3

12 May 2026, 16:41 UTC945 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос на знание Лазурки. Кто эта женщина? Who's this girl? / Chi è questa ragazza?

  1. Brigitte Bardot di St-Tropez60%
  2. Ruth Negga di Cannes32%
  3. Victoria Bonya di Monaco11%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥9😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stastyrkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2026, 16:41 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Вопрос на знание Лазурки. Кто эта женщина? Who's this girl? / Chi è questa ragazza?

  1. Brigitte Bardot di St-Tropez60%
  2. Ruth Negga di Cannes32%
  3. Victoria Bonya di Monaco11%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KIRILL AND HIS FRIENDS
@KirillandhisFriends · 24,539
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Антон Долин
@anton_dolin · 51,692
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stas Tyrkin Inc.” (@stastyrkin), 1,815 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stastyrkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.