Posted without readable text

Channel
Ставрополь сейчас
@stav_grad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,457subscribers
-3,376 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001620272429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stav_grad |
| Created | 2 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stav_grad |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:35 | 16,457 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 16,469 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:43 | 16,477 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 16,485 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 16,493 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 16,496 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 16,506 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 16,519 | -3,133 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 19,652 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 19,655 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 19,658 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 19,660 | -23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 19,683 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 19,700 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 19,699 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 19,711 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 19,704 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 19,711 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 19,730 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 19,740 | first reading |
Engagement
200 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.3%
- avg views ÷ 16,457 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,860
- 162 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 162
- of 200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 162 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 300,766 |
| Reactions total | 529 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 52s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
627 reactions across 111 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 136 | 21.7% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 19.1% | |
| 🤡 | 112 | 17.9% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 3.99% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 3.99% | |
| 🤮 | 23 | 3.67% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 3.51% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 3.35% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 3.03% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 2.71% | |
| 💊 | 15 | 2.39% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 2.39% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 2.23% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 1.91% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 1.75% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 1.44% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.797% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.797% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.638% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.638% | |
| 6 further kinds | 13 | 2.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 627 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 200 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stav_grad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 200 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.5%
- 1 of 200 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,950
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,850
- over 199 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvoHEVy | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
🛴 Две 16-летние пользовательницы электросамоката пострадали в ДТП в Ставрополе. Авария произошла вчера около 16:50 на улице Западный обход. Девушки ехали вдвоём на арендованном электросамокате и пересекали пешеходный переход, не спешившись. В этот момент 39-летний водитель «Лады» поворачивал направо и сбил их. Девушки госпитализированы. Защитной экипировки на них не было. Водителя автомобиля за последние два года …
Ставрополь помнит: Андрею Хасановичу Джатдоеву сегодня могло бы исполниться 64 года. Джатдоев посвятил развитию Ставрополя более 30 лет своей жизни и задал по-настоящему высокую планку для будущих градоправителей. Бывшему мэру посмертно присвоено звание Почётного гражданина Ставрополя. @stvrpl1
🙏11
На части улиц Ставрополя будет временно ограничена подача электроэнергии 3 сентября С 9:00 до 12:00 света не будет по следующим адресам: — переулок Бестужева (дома 3-29, 4-36); — улица Бурмистрова (113-131, 112-130); — улица Красная (31-55, 38-60); — проезд Новосибирский (1-23, 4-20); — проезд Аральский, 2А. В связи с неотложными ремонтными работами отключения также затронут: — с 8:30 до 16:30 — улица Шевченко (…
🛰 Ставропольцы смогут увидеть пролет МКС В начале сентября станция несколько раз пролетит над городом. Если небо будет ясным, её можно заметить как яркую движущуюся точку. Ближайшие пролёты: 📍3 сентября — 03:01 📍4 сентября — 03:50 📍5 сентября — 03:05 📍6 сентября — 03:54 📍7 сентября — 19:47 📍8 сентября — 20:35 @stavripoltop
👍4❤1🔥1
Средняя зарплата россиян достигла уже 115 тысяч рублей в месяц, следует из данных Росстата.
🤮15🤔4🤡4👎1
Posted without readable text
🤬1
Памятник XIX века возле «Базара» в Ставрополе может рухнуть. Доходный дом купца Синельщикова на улице Горького, 49 официально закрыт для посещений. Приказ издало краевое управление по охране объектов культурного наследия — техосмотр признал здание аварийным. Собственнику предписано оградить периметр, закрыть входы и не допускать на объект посторонних. История дома печальна: построен в 1904 году, он был украшен баше…
😢2
День города в Ставрополе отметят 12 сентября без массовых торжеств В этом году Ставрополь отпразднует 249-летие 12 сентября - в этот же день традиционно отметят и День Ставропольского края. Об этом во время прямой линии сообщил глава города Иван Ульянченко. По словам мэра, праздничные мероприятия пройдут в парках, скверах, дворах и на спортивных площадках. При этом от масштабных торжеств решили отказаться, а особое…
👍4
Путин назвал слухи о новой мобилизации «чушью собачьей» — РИА «Новости» Президент ответил на вбросы западных СМИ о том, что после выборов в Госдуму в России якобы объявят новую волну призыва. В Киргизии, на пресс-подходе по итогам саммита ШОС, он заявил: «Это чушь собачья. Это информационная атака на Россию». в курсе
🤡6❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1
Средняя зарплата педагогов Ставрополья выросла до 47 тысяч рублей По данным краевого Минобра, столько в среднем получают работники сферы образования в регионе. По сравнению с 2025 годом показатель увеличился на 8%.
🤡3👎1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @stav_grad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ATVmedia26 · 3,8933 postsNewsTracker | Ставрополь и СКФО
@News_Tracker · 12,2653 postsСтавропольская телега
@svoetv · 16,6113 postsКП Ставрополь. Новости Северного Кавказа. Stav.kp.ru
@kpstav · 6,9992 postsStavropol.Media | Новости Ставрополя
@stavropol_media · 7,1882 postsСтаврополье с огоньком
@stavropoltop · 27,2132 postsСтаврополь №1
@stvrpl1 · 1,9442 postsТопор. Экономика.
@ecotopor · 1,188,6541 postНовости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,687,5881 postПобеда26 — Новости Ставрополья
@pobeda26skia · 6,5631 post1777 Новости | Ставрополь и Ставропольский край
@Stavropol1777 · 39,2251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@netip_stav · 135,513
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@stavropolie26 · 35,675
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@chp_26stv · 88,966
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
@stvstv · 73,119
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@stavropol_smi · 81,718
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@chp26rus · 48,610
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
@Stavropol1777 · 39,225
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@bloknot_stavropol · 59,415
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ставрополь сейчас” (@stav_grad), 16,457 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stav_grad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.