Channel
@step2017
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,804subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002093885188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @step2017 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/step2017 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 2,804 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 2,812 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 2,814 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,815 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 2,814 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 2,816 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 64.4% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2024 to 30 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اختبارات ستيب مسربة للتدريب pinned «تأتي هذي الدورة بعدة مميزات اهمها: مجموعات صغيرة لا تتجاوز ال٥ طلاب بكل محاضرة لسهولة الفهم واتاحة فرصة اكبر للاسئلة اثناء المحاضرات والتدريب بالتركيز ع كل طالب موقع محاكي نسخة طبق الاصل من موقع قياس لكسر رهبه الاختبار واجب على كل محاضرة وكويز في بداية…»
تأتي هذي الدورة بعدة مميزات اهمها: مجموعات صغيرة لا تتجاوز ال٥ طلاب بكل محاضرة لسهولة الفهم واتاحة فرصة اكبر للاسئلة اثناء المحاضرات والتدريب بالتركيز ع كل طالب موقع محاكي نسخة طبق الاصل من موقع قياس لكسر رهبه الاختبار واجب على كل محاضرة وكويز في بداية كل محاضرة جديدة اختبار تحديد مستوى قبل بداية الدورة وبعد نهايتها لقياس مستواك
❤7
اختبارات ستيب مسربة للتدريب pinned a photo
دورة ستيب اكتوبر VIP محدثة بنموذج 47
❤2👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
👏3❤2🔥2🤩1🥰1
30. Which sentence has the CORRECT PUNCTUATION?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👏4😁1
29. He is as a teacher, …… so is his brother.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8🍾2
28. Did you know that neither Ted …… Tom graduated this year?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
27. Mrs. Davis, …… we saw at the lecture last week, is in London for a conference.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
26. Bob wrote a very nice and well-organized essay, just like his teacher……… him.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
25. My uncle told me …… mathematics because it is very difficult.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
24. I don't know how …… to answer that question. It was very easy.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @step2017. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
30. Which sentence has the CORRECT PUNCTUATION?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
29. He is as a teacher, …… so is his brother.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
28. Did you know that neither Ted …… Tom graduated this year?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
27. Mrs. Davis, …… we saw at the lecture last week, is in London for a conference.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
26. Bob wrote a very nice and well-organized essay, just like his teacher……… him.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
25. My uncle told me …… mathematics because it is very difficult.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2024 to 30 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اختبارات ستيب مسربة للتدريب” (@step2017), 2,804 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/step2017.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.