Channel
@steponeit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,288subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001652524862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @steponeit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/steponeit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 3,288 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 3,290 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 3,297 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 3,304 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 3,309 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 3,310 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 3,312 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 3,312 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
444 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 117 | 26.4% | |
| 🔥 | 115 | 25.9% | |
| 😁 | 79 | 17.8% | |
| ❤ | 64 | 14.4% | |
| 🤯 | 48 | 10.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 4.50% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.225% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот и первый баг! Не успел WireMock.Grpc.Protobuf толком размяться, как у него появился первый баг. Всё по-взрослому. Проблема нашлась в GrpcPredicateMatcher. Первый запрос он обрабатывал правильно, а при повторном вызове выдавал отсутствие совпадения. Особенно хорошо эффект проявлялся на protobuf-сообщениях с repeated-полями. Причина оказалась в одной строчке: private static readonly TMessage Empty = new(); pr…
👍9🔥5🤯3❤🔥1
Как я посадил WireMock.Net на gRPC стероиды WireMock.Net умеет мокать gRPC. Но для этого он заставляет разработчика таскать .proto файлы и поддерживать лишнюю конфигурацию. Я контрибьютил в проект несколько месяцев, разобрался в кишках и написал своё расширение WireMock.Grpc.Protobuf Пакет предлагает gRPC моки через типизированные контракты Google.Protobuf. Получилось короче, надёжнее и заметно удобнее. Можно прове…
👍13🔥5❤3❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
👍10❤2🔥2🤯2❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
DotNext приезжает в Сокольники Я редко рассказываю про конференции. Доклады доступны в записи, а бейджик участника не превращает мидла в сеньора. Но DotNext — исключение Я с трудом стал там спикером. Ещё и работаю над конкурентом — «Стачкой». Поэтому у меня есть все основания промолчать. Но не в этот раз Для меня DotNext давно остаётся тем самым местом, где C#-разработчики говорят о настоящей инженерии, пока джави…
❤20👍9🔥9❤🔥2
Первый и последний раз показываю как правильно использовать нейросети. Думайте
😁24🔥5👍4❤🔥1
GitHub не заплатит: зумеры против Open Source ветеранов. 🥊Формат баттла строится на оппозиционных мнениях. И наши спикеры видят мир IT по-разному. 🎙️С одной стороны баттла Степан Минин готовит прагматичный зумерский контрудар рациональным инвестированием времени вместо романтики в IT. О спикере: Старший .NET разработчик Золотое Яблоко. Спикер DotNext, Ozon E-Code. Лидер ПК C# секции Стачки. Топ-5 автор Хабра по C#. …
❤11🔥2❤🔥1😁1
HydraScript 2.7.0 Compound Assignments В языке появилась поддержка compound assignments: теперь можно писать привычные конструкции вроде x += y, x -= y, x *= y и так далее. Интересно, что я попробовал поручить эту задачу нейросети — и она не справилась Она быстро предложила идею синтаксического сахара: «развернуть x += y в x = x + y» Но дальше начались проблемы: модель не поняла, какие рефакторинги нужны и споткнул…
👍8❤3🔥2❤🔥1
Нейрозатраты Вчера компания, где я работаю, сожгла месячный лимит LLM вендора. За две недели слито 1 500 000 рублей. Я тут же развеселил корпчат: "ИИ уменьшит корпоративные расходы и оптимизирует затраты говорили они)))" Но мне не смешно. Разработчики тащат в компанию счётчик токенов, чтобы радоваться скорости, с которой он крутится. Они выбирают отключить голову, делегировать работу ИИ и с гордостью хвастаться ни…
🔥34😁14👍6❤🔥3❤2
Взять того же Гладкова Я не верю в миф 10x-программистов. Особенно когда 10иксеры делят коллег по принципу: «я — рок-звезда разработки и все остальные лоуперформеры» А дальше начинаются вопросы, на которые ни одна рок-звезда не ответит: 😏 Эти самые 10x ревьюеров с нами в одной комнате? Или код летит в продакшн как набросы на вентилятор? 😳 10иксер готов к 10x реакции тестировщиков, которым надо проверить 10x фич? 😱 …
👍36🔥6😁5❤1
Починил WireMock пока не заблокировали GitHub Я использую WireMock на работе, чтобы мокировать gRPC-вызовы внешних сервисов и тестировать транспортный уровень. Это придаёт уверенности в интеграциях до выхода в реальные окружения. Всё должно было работать гладко, но я столкнулся с неприятностью. Логи мок-сервера внезапно заполнились ошибками. Это произошло, как только моков стало несколько и ко всем пошли запросы. Ст…
🤯19🔥11👍7❤1❤🔥1😁1
Министерство Джавистов публикует файлы СтэпУан. Фото в цвете. ШарпиZм. Подписаться
😁12🔥3🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @steponeit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 711,410 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StepOne | Степан Минин” (@steponeit), 3,288 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steponeit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.