╰┈➤ Стевос Рп был создан ради рисунков богини плачевной 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472003989536885072💅1💘1custom 54472834163765516471custom 54498135730206909881

Channel
@stevoserasrp_cf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003764027050 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stevoserasrp_cf |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stevoserasrp_cf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 65 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 65 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (3 October 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 516 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447283416376551647 | 14 | 19.4% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5449437067597589794 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 12.5% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5375535699934062568 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5447464157190302847 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5447200398953688507 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5447455769119195858 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5449813573020690988 | 2 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
╰┈➤ Стевос Рп был создан ради рисунков богини плачевной 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472003989536885072💅1💘1custom 54472834163765516471custom 54498135730206909881
╰┈➤ Ляпис из 1 эры ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472834163765516474custom 54474641571903028474❤1🍓1
╰┈➤ Такой тейк не нарушает правила, так чтооууу пишем Были в фандоме серьезные конфликты или неприятные персоны которых надо опасаться? ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472834163765516471custom 54474557691191958581
╰┈➤ Добрый вечер дорогие!! Нравится ли вам Стевос? Какую бы вы дали оценку игре от 1 до 10-ти, учитывая минусы и плюсы плейса. ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54494370675975897942
╰┈➤ привет , я тут скорее узнать больше о тиме ? так что буду вопросы . как вы к нему относитесь ?? какие не очень поступки он совершал ? устраивают ли вас его цены ?? ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472834163765516473custom 54474557691191958581
╰┈➤ https://t.me/stevoserasrp_cf/134 мне хочется ответить на это сообщение. в англ фандоме разгорелся скандал, где огромный контент креатор сказал в сторисе, что "он/его не используются для рп за гемов". из-за таких слов этого человека начала отменять за трансфобию. думаю стоит обозначать, что где и когда стоит разрешать местоимения. ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472834163765516472custom 53755356999340625681custom 54494370675975897941
╰┈➤ Недавно в рп был спор о том, стоит ли использовать местоимения он/его в эре 1. Как вы думаете, стоит их юзать или оставить она/её? ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
custom 54472834163765516472🍓1custom 54494370675975897941
╰┈➤ буду ожидать локации, где будем отыгрывать за дефектных самоцветов. плейс войдет в пик, если добавят такие локации. Автор видео: @jumpyghostygem ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
🍓4❤1💅1custom 53755356999340625681
#вп
❕❕❕Внимание реклама❕❕❕ Приглашаю вас присоединиться к моему телеграм-каналу по игре Gemtopia! Gemtopia — это ролевая игра, действие которой разворачивается во время первой и второй эры до и после войны самоцветов, но до появления людей в пляжном городе. На этом канале вы сможете: - Узнать последние новости и обновления - Общаться с единомышленниками - Делиться своим опытом и находками Не пропустите шанс стать час…
🍓3💅1💘1custom 53755356999340625681
╰┈➤ Как думаете, корабли Алмазов скоро добавят? ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
💘4❤2💅1custom 53755356999340625681custom 54494370675975897941custom 54498135730206909881
╰┈➤ Автор: @bonnieboyooo ⋆. 𐙚 ˚ #тейк
💅2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @stevoserasrp_cf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stevos Gem Era RP Confession” (@stevoserasrp_cf), 65 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stevoserasrp_cf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.