Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐•Š๐•ฅ๐•š๐•ฅ๐•”๐•™ ๐•Š๐•’๐•—๐•– โ„™๐•๐•’๐•ช

Channel

๐•Š๐•ฅ๐•š๐•ฅ๐•”๐•™ ๐•Š๐•’๐•—๐•– โ„™๐•๐•’๐•ช

@stichsafeplay

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

5,948subscribers

-1,394 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002607352737
TypeChannel
Username@stichsafeplay
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stichsafeplay

Growth

5,9487,3426,6458 August 2026 โ€” 7,342 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 7,313 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 7,197 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 7,155 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 7,062 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 6,388 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 6,250 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 6,201 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 6,177 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 6,159 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 5,948 subscribers8 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -1,394. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 5,739โ€“7,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:595,948-211
2 Sept 2026, 21:266,159-18
31 Aug 2026, 03:566,177-24
28 Aug 2026, 05:086,201-49
24 Aug 2026, 22:476,250-138
20 Aug 2026, 23:386,388-674
18 Aug 2026, 02:027,062-93
15 Aug 2026, 01:147,155-42
12 Aug 2026, 03:537,197-116
8 Aug 2026, 17:367,313-29
8 Aug 2026, 01:477,342first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
12.9%
avg views รท 5,948 subscribers
Avg views / post
766
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.633%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held53 (2 August 2026 โ€“ 20 August 2026)
Views total24,501
Reactions total149
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

239 reactions across 50 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค16870.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ5523.0%
๐Ÿ‘83.35%
๐Ÿ‘31.26%
๐Ÿ’Š10.418%
๐Ÿ˜10.418%
๐Ÿค”10.418%
๐Ÿคฎ10.418%
๐Ÿฅฐ10.418%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC604 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Thatโ€™s what playing it safe looks like

โค3๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1

20 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC614 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

$JOTCHUA god candle what did i say ???? 7X easy

๐Ÿ”ฅ7

19 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC318 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Today, I think there are only 2 plays worth watching, and Iโ€™ve already posted detailed breakdowns for both on X 1. $CYBERLEEK ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg This is the one I think has the stronger narrative right now. Attention is still pretty high, and the main catalyst is still whatever happens around August 27 When I posted about it yesterday, $CYBERLEEK had already pumped insanely hard, so I diโ€ฆ

โค4

19 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC580 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: $66,000 Bitcoin @WatcherGuru

โค2

18 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC689 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Yeah, SOL is back today with Ansemโ€™s new launchpad getting a lot of attention So I recapped the 3 tokens I personally think are worth watching : 1. $MANLET - Full breakdown https://x.com/stitchdegen/status/2089667624192110869?s=20 2. $EYE - One of the leading tokens from the launchpad https://x.com/stitchdegen/status/2089677598485803078?s=20 3. $Z500 - A direct play on the launchpadโ€™s core mechanism https://x.โ€ฆ

โค6

18 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC685 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Looks like $ANSEM is coming for that $1B market cap

โค4

18 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC708 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Today I checked a bunch of Sol plays and honestly, way too many of them are heavily bundled $MANLET is probably one of the cleaner setups Iโ€™ve found so far HxQhDGYqyjorgogMJx7YbBHADEDxuHhLnMMmr6VYpyn Iโ€™ve already opened a position here, and if it drops back to around $1.5Mโ€“$2M, Iโ€™ll DCA more Itโ€™s already done a 2x since my original call, and now itโ€™s sitting at a pretty decent dip again Ansem has also shown suppโ€ฆ

โค7

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @stichsafeplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

fomo or gmgn ?

  1. FOMO43%
  2. GMGN60%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐•Š๐•ฅ๐•š๐•ฅ๐•”๐•™ ๐•Š๐•’๐•—๐•– โ„™๐•๐•’๐•ชโ€ (@stichsafeplay), 5,948 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stichsafeplay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.