Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3,143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,857–20,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:18
17,650
-971
15 Sept 2026, 15:55
18,621
-440
13 Sept 2026, 20:36
19,061
+1,712
12 Sept 2026, 00:21
17,349
+1,650
9 Sept 2026, 14:18
15,699
-83
6 Sept 2026, 06:16
15,782
-82
3 Sept 2026, 21:01
15,864
-551
2 Sept 2026, 16:07
16,415
-19
1 Sept 2026, 14:23
16,434
-837
31 Aug 2026, 17:25
17,271
-29
30 Aug 2026, 20:12
17,300
+146
29 Aug 2026, 19:05
17,154
+1,888
28 Aug 2026, 22:06
15,266
+1,089
28 Aug 2026, 01:37
14,177
-23
27 Aug 2026, 02:54
14,200
-51
26 Aug 2026, 01:04
14,251
-37
25 Aug 2026, 04:25
14,288
-98
24 Aug 2026, 02:48
14,386
-90
22 Aug 2026, 07:36
14,476
-34
20 Aug 2026, 23:53
14,510
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 17,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
38 (1 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
35,250
Reactions total
4,433
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,386 reactions across 37 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,188
44.6%
🔥
2,405
25.6%
👍
1,737
18.5%
❤🔥
393
4.19%
🤩
175
1.86%
🥰
126
1.34%
😍
114
1.21%
🎉
81
0.863%
👏
46
0.49%
⚡
37
0.394%
💋
29
0.309%
👌
18
0.192%
😁
8
0.085%
🙏
7
0.075%
🍓
4
0.043%
🤣
4
0.043%
✍
3
0.032%
🤔
3
0.032%
🤝
3
0.032%
🍾
2
0.021%
2 further kinds
3
0.032%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Собрала главные цвета этого осеннего сезона. Палитра получилась невероятно богатой, выразительной и сложной.
Вот ключевые оттенки, на которые стоит обратить внимание:
🖤 Глубокий чёрный — вечная классика, которая этой осенью раскрывается через сложные фактуры: матовую кожу, плотную шерсть и безупречный архитектурный крой.
🍅 Томатный красный — сочный, живой алый, главный акцент сезона.
☕️ Глубокий шоколад — богатст…
С 1 сентября! 🔔
Поздравляю всех родителей и школьников с новым учебным годом!
Мы с Ильёй к старту готовы: отстояли торжественную линейку и с отличным настроением врываемся в учебу. #сегоднятак
Пусть этот год пройдёт легко, интересно и без лишних нервов. Родителям — сил и огромного терпения! 🙏
Делитесь, как прошла ваша линейка? 👇
#сегоднятак
Финишная прямая перед 1 сентября! 🎒
Честно? Вдруг накатило легкое волнение. Вроде бы далеко не первый раз отправляю детей в школу, всё отработано до мелочей, а внутренний «мамин мандраж» всё равно включился. Кажется, это встроенная функция, которая не отключается с опытом. 😅
Для сегодняшнего марафона сборов выбрала тотальный комфорт, но с маленькой стилистической фишкой. Когда надеваете мега-объемные б…
Фактура под рептилию — один из главных хитов этой осени. И не зря: она выглядит действительно роскошно, глубоко и визуально сразу делает образ дороже. Самое приятное — здесь не нужны сложные стилистические ухищрения, эта фактура работает сама по себе.
Но принт довольно активный, и далеко не все готовы сразу носить его. Как легко вписать тренд, если есть сомнения?
▫️ Смещаем акцент. Выбирайте юбки, брюки, сапоги, су…
Сегодня день на максималках! Нужно успеть побывать сразу на двух крупных мероприятиях, так что лечу на всех парах. 🚀
Единственный кадр, который успела сделать на бегу на первом — вот это быстрое селфи. Но погода, конечно, дарит прямо настоящее лето — просто огонь! 🔥☀️
Мчу дальше! А ваш день как проходит: в активном движении или в спокойном, неспешном ритме? 😉👇
В поисках классной сумки для клиентки наткнулась на новую коллекцию «АЛЬФА» от AFINA.
Вышло очень здорово: лаконичный дизайн, фактурная натуральная кожа и самые красивые осенние оттенки. Все модели созданы для реальной, активной жизни, где эстетика и удобство идут рука об руку.
Кстати, в честь запуска новой коллекции у бренда сейчас действует приятная скидка 10% на новинки, а за активацию их Telegram-бота и регистр…
Пятница выдалась такой тёплой, что убирать шорты подальше в шкаф я пока точно не буду! ☀️
Ловим с сыном эти солнечные моменты на бегу. Для активного дня в городе выбрала простую и удобную базу: тонкий шоколадный трикотаж, деним и мягкие лоферы. Обожаю эту палитру — по цветам уже тепло и по-осеннему, а по ощущениям — всё ещё лето.
А у вас как погода сегодня? Тоже греетесь? 😉👇
Записаться на диагностику стиля — @Your…
Знаю, для перчаток ещё рановато, но «готовь сани летом»! 😉
В Befree нашла отличные варианты на прохладный сезон. Учитывая мою суперспособность вечно их терять (хоть реально на резинку сквозь рукава пришивай, как в детстве 😂), много перчаток не бывает.
Модели классные, выглядят стильно и стоят доступно. Советую присмотреться, пока не разобрали самые ходовые цвета и размеры.
Сохраняйте наводку! 📌
Записаться на диаг…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @stilist_Moskva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина Рóсса” (@stilist_Moskva), 17,650 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stilist_Moskva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.