Channel
@stilistkarealistka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,582subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001578872131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stilistkarealistka |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stilistkarealistka |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 3,582 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 3,585 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 3,591 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 3,593 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:11 | 3,595 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 3,598 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 3,606 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 3,609 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 3,610 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 46.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 21.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 10.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjdd8CMZ | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Посмотрите на Екатерину. Что изменилось – кроме волос? Екатерина хотела вернуть себе ощущение энергии и выглядеть современно, на свой возраст. Я думаю у нас получилось 👌🏻 Формально изменилось всего две вещи: цвет и стрижка. Но ощущение от внешности стало совершенно другим. До – длинные прямые волосы, спокойный холодноватый оттенок, открытое лицо. Всё достаточно нейтрально и тускло. После – тёплый медный цвет, чел…
🔥2
Зендея для промо-тура к фильму «Одиссея» буквально собрала образ Афины. Вместе с Лоу Роучем они собрали гардероб, в котором буквально всё поддерживает образ: античные драпировки, золото, скульптурные формы, архивные Givenchy и Alberta Ferretti, Schiaparelli и украшения, будто найденные в сокровищнице древнегреческой богини. Выбранные наряды не просто «посмотрите, какое красивое платье», а продолжение истории. Каж…
👍4👏3❤2
Школа Адекватного Гардероба (ШАГ) pinned a photo
Джинсы с кружевом – один из самых простых способов сделать привычный образ интереснее. Этот прием пришел к нам из эстетики бохо и бельевого стиля, которые уже несколько сезонов остаются в числе главных трендов. Дизайнеры начали добавлять кружево к дениму, сочетая грубую фактуру джинсов с нежностью и женственностью кружевных деталей. Но самое интересное, что вам совсем не обязательно покупать новую пару. Если в ваш…
🔥6👍1🥰1
Подборка верхней одежды для теплой осени. Сейчас самое время для лёгкой верхней одежды: курток, ветровок, плащей и моделей, которые можно носить слоями. Именно такие вещи работают дольше всего – и в прохладное утро, и днём, когда на улице ещё достаточно тепло. Собрала несколько интересных вариантов на предстоящий сезон. Здесь есть и спокойная база, и более акцентные модели для тех, кто любит, когда верхняя одежда …
❤9👍2👏2
Новый день и новый шоппинг, в моём телефоне сотня фото, всё для того, чтобы выбрать 10-20 на примерку для клиентки
❤11🔥2👍1🥰1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @stilistkarealistka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа Адекватного Гардероба (ШАГ)” (@stilistkarealistka), 3,582 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stilistkarealistka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.