Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Станислав Пикальков

Channel

Станислав Пикальков

@stitch_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002541113376
TypeChannel
Username@stitch_blog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stitch_blog

Growth

929995.57 August 2026 — 94 subscribers9 August 2026 — 94 subscribers1 September 2026 — 92 subscribers10 September 2026 — 99 subscribers19 September 2026 — 98 subscribers987 August 202619 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 43 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:3898-1
10 Sept 2026, 16:1899+7
1 Sept 2026, 11:2792-2
9 Aug 2026, 13:0294no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1594first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3136.5%
1720.0%
👍1720.0%
🔥1315.3%
👏33.53%
💯22.35%
🤯11.18%
🥰11.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC204 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Первая публикуемая в канале вакансия — ищу людей к себе в команду: Рекрутер в стартап Мастерская (maya.it.ru) — это стартап-лаборатория, в которой мы создаем продукты и запускаем стартапы начиная от этапа идеи и доводя их до реализации. У нас есть больше десяти продуктов в разных стадиях. Какие-то находятся на этапе проработки гипотез, какие-то — на этапе инженерного решения, какие-то — на этапе практически готового

🔥4

28 Jun 2026, 16:44 UTC158 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Никогда такого не было, и вот опять. Помню, как 2017 меня попросили найти Котлин разработчика с 10 годами опыта. На аргумент, что он в 2011 вышел сказали, что я просто слабый рекрутер

😁5🤯1

19 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Для тех, кто жалуется на высокие кпи: Пакет вознаграждения Elon Musk в SpaceX привязан к двум целям. Первая часть (~$0.58 трлн) будет выплачена, если оценка компании SpaceX достигнет $7,5 трлн и она создаст на Марсе постоянную человеческую колонию численностью не менее одного миллиона человек. Вторая часть (~$0.15 трлн) — если SpaceX развернет в космосе дата-центры с потребляемой мощностью не менее 100 ТераВатт, ч

5

13 Jun 2026, 20:29 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @GreenNeuralRobotsPhoto

Встречайте новый бенчмарк #humor

😁3👍1

12 Jun 2026, 20:43 UTC143 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Читаю комментарии к работе своего агента в цикле улучшения кода. Пишет "эта попытка удачна, но стало хуже". Сижу, думаю, как мы с ним похожи)

😁4👍1

9 Jun 2026, 11:32 UTC179 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мне всё больше кажется, что нормальный ИИ для рекрутмента должен быть сделан не как мясорубка для входящего потока, а как инструмент сборки проверяемого сигнала. Не "сократи мне кандидата до трёх буллетов", а "помоги понять, что в этом профиле правда важно". Не "найди красные флаги", а "разбери, какие из этих признаков реально являются риском для нашей задачи, а какие просто выглядят тревожно в резюме". Не "дай мне т

🔥3👍1🥰1😁1

9 Jun 2026, 11:32 UTC251 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я тут дообучал своего ИИ-рекрутера и в какой-то момент поймал очень неприятное ощущение: он стал слишком похож на настоящего - он начал меня скамить) Причём сначала всё выглядело даже хорошо. Я его дообучал, докручивал контекст, объяснял, как мы смотрим на кандидатов, почему нам важен не просто формальный мэтч по вакансии, а реальная пригодность человека под задачу, как не отсекать людей слишком рано по кривым призн

👍43👏1

5 Jun 2026, 20:38 UTC125 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Шо, коллеги, у кого зарплаты 5 и 20, пишите, а то че мы по отдельности пьем)

😁6

3 Jun 2026, 19:23 UTC140 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы движемся очень быстро, хорошим темпом, но, к сожалению, в другую сторону — председатель набсовета Мосбиржи Швецов. @bankrollo

😁4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stitch_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Станислав Пикальков” (@stitch_blog), 98 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stitch_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.