Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Школа Стоицизма

Channel

Школа Стоицизма

@stoicism_school

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,994subscribers

+824 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439678700
TypeChannel
Username@stoicism_school
DescriptionШкола Стоицизма — сообщество людей, увлечённых философией. Мы развиваем силу духа, точное мышление и способность преодолевать любые трудности. Основатели: Александр Саликов и Ирина Райт. По всем вопросам: Служба заботы Школы Стоицизма — @stoic_help
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stoicism_school

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,16913,99413,581.56 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,175 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,183 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,202 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,219 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,230 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,241 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,249 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,272 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,283 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,303 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,299 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,324 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,338 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,346 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,354 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,357 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,373 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,402 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,406 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,423 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,432 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,441 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,449 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,464 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,507 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,541 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,561 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,568 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,591 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,626 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,717 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,837 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,852 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,884 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,904 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,917 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,924 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,928 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,927 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,937 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,939 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,942 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,943 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,950 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,954 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,974 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,975 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,977 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,975 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,970 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,977 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,976 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,990 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,993 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,994 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net +824. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,045–14,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:4613,994+1
3 Nov 2026, 20:1013,993+3
2 Nov 2026, 17:5013,990+14
1 Nov 2026, 21:0713,976-1
31 Oct 2026, 22:4513,977+7
30 Oct 2026, 19:1013,970-5
28 Oct 2026, 22:5713,975-2
27 Oct 2026, 20:5013,977+2
26 Oct 2026, 20:2713,975+1
25 Oct 2026, 19:5513,974+20
24 Oct 2026, 16:2713,954+4
23 Oct 2026, 19:1813,950+7
22 Oct 2026, 19:1813,943+1
21 Oct 2026, 11:3713,942+3
20 Oct 2026, 09:4513,939+2
19 Oct 2026, 10:5613,937+10
18 Oct 2026, 12:1413,927-1
17 Oct 2026, 10:5013,928+4
16 Oct 2026, 13:3913,924+7
15 Oct 2026, 10:4113,917first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 13,994 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held64 (9 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total62,410
Reactions total990
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 05:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
330
Videos
75
Links
635

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,693 reactions across 64 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,27834.6%
❤90224.4%
👍68218.5%
custom 524689423964362923749413.4%
💯1143.09%
😁892.41%
👏441.19%
❤‍🔥280.758%
🤔170.46%
✍150.406%
🤩130.352%
👌70.19%
😍40.108%
🤗20.054%
⚡10.027%
🎉10.027%
🕊10.027%
🤝10.027%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
196
across the posts below
Posts paid on
62
of 64 we hold a reading for · 97%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stoicism_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,010 views28 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Готовьтесь к каждому дню как Олимпийский чемпион У выдающихся спортсменов есть практика психической репетиции: перед соревнованиями они мысленно выполняют каждую деталь элемента, проходят всю трассу, видя каждый поворот, ощущая реакцию своего тела на каждый холмик и изменение направления. Ключевая часть, этого упражнения — это управление эмоциями. Спортсмен в голове проигрывает возможные ситуации и свои желаемые реа…

🔥10❤8👍7✍3

3 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,310 views23 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

НОЯБРЬ В ШКОЛЕ СТОИЦИЗМА В ноябре продолжаем соединять чтение философских текстов с практикой, обсуждением и живыми встречами. 📚 В Книжном клубе: читаем «Теорию игр» Хаима Шапиры, комментарии Симпликия к «Энхиридиону» Эпиктета, роман «Отец» Зои и «Гроздья гнева» Джона Стейнбека. Разбираем тексты вместе, обсуждаем аргументы авторов и учимся читать медленно и внимательно. 🥸 В Клубе Стоиков: погружение в практики стои…

🔥9❤8👍3custom 52468942396436292373

2 Nov 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,520 views25 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026

«НАСТРОЙКА НА ДЕНЬ» 14 дней онлайн-практики с 5 ноября Мы собрали отзывы участников онлайн-практики «Настройка на день» ➡️ доработали её и снова открываем доступ для всех желающих. ✔️ теперь практику не нужно проходить в фиксированное время. Каждый может делать настройку тогда, когда это действительно удобно: утром сразу после пробуждения, перед началом работы или в тот момент, когда начинается ваш день. ✔️ мы т…

🔥12👍6❤3custom 52468942396436292372🤩1😁1

1 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,000 views61 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Что такое мужество? Сказать правду? Не отступить? Выдержать страх? Не сорваться? Принять неприятное? Возразить? Наоборот, промолчать? В одной жизненной ситуации мужество будет выглядеть как действие, а в другой — как отказ от действия. Сегодня оно может потребоваться в разговоре с начальником, завтра — в разговоре с ребёнком, послезавтра — в способности спокойно принять то, что нельзя изменить. Добродетель станови…

👍23🔥18❤14custom 52468942396436292376

31 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,070 views53 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Внешнее событие порой приходит внезапно. Что-то случилось, кто-то что-то сказал, пришло сообщение, новость, вызов, сбой, проблема. Но как бы внезапно ни наступило событие, у человека всегда есть выбор. Как вы его сейчас воспримите? А что вы на базе этого восприятия сделаете? Как поступите? Вы понимаете, где в этом событии «добро» и «зло»? Но обычно мы этот момент упускаем. Событие произошло — и мы сразу отреагирова…

❤24💯13👍8🔥7custom 52468942396436292371

30 Oct 2026, 09:11 UTC≈2,080 views45 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

«Знал, но забыл»: почему мы вроде всё знаем, но в нужный момент поступаем не так как надо? Мы вроде бы всё знаем... Знаем, что зависит от нас, а что нет. Знаем, что внешнее само по себе не является ни благом, ни злом. Знаем, что в сложной ситуации хорошо бы сохранить самообладание, проявить мужество, рассудительность, не сорваться в привычную реакцию. А потом что-нибудь происходит — и всё. Мы ведём себя совсем не т…

🔥18❤11👍11custom 52468942396436292375

28 Oct 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,210 views54 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Video

Вчера прошли традиционные живые встречи стоиков в городах мира 🔥Астана, Бали, Владивосток, Екатеринбург, Нижний Новгород, Новосибирск, Нягань, Москва, Санкт-Петербург, Таганрог, Уфа и Щёлково — в каждом из этих городов участники собрались вместе, чтобы обсудить идеи, изложенные в 27-м письме Сенеки к Луцилию. Спасибо амбассадорам Школы Стоицизма за то, что собираете вокруг себя людей, которым важны философия, вдумч…

🔥31👍9❤8👏3custom 52468942396436292373

27 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC≈2,480 views32 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, уже сегодня живые встречи стоиков в разных городах мира 🔥 Читаем и обсуждаем 27-е письмо Сенеки. Присоединяйтесь. Список городов и регистрация

🔥13❤9custom 52468942396436292378👏2

26 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈2,650 views63 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

Как подготовиться к будущему, если мы не знаем, каким оно будет? Ответ стоиков В минувшую субботу соосновательница Школы Стоицизма Ирина Райт приняла участие в дискуссии «Будущее уже с нами» в рамках конференции Сбера «Больше чем обучение». Публикуем несколько тезисов выступления. Среда за последние две тысячи лет изменилась радикально, а человек — практически нет. Мы по-прежнему боимся потерять статус, деньги и од…

❤24🔥19👍13👏5😁2

23 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC≈3,010 views108 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Стоики поучают других, а сами не соответствуют своей же планке. Стоиков нередко обвиняют в морализаторстве, в позиции свысока, в белом пальто, если угодно. У Сенеки есть на этот счёт точный ответ, который стоит помнить, читая мастеров стоицизма: «Ты поучаешь меня, — скажешь ты. — Не потому ли, что сам уже исправился через собственные поучения и теперь тебе хватает времени искоренять чужие пороки?» — Я не так бесче…

❤54🔥23💯14👍9custom 52468942396436292378

22 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,960 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

24 октября онлайн-встреча для тех, кто хочет пройти программу по Марку Аврелию Уже шесть лет Александр Саликов проводит программу, посвящённую Марку Аврелию. В этом году мы решили изменить формат. Поняв, что трёх-четырёх месяцев недостаточно для глубокого изучения «Размышлений» и применения идей Марка Аврелия в собственной жизни, развернули программу на целый год. Почему год? Мы не просто читаем и обсуждаем книгу.…

🔥12👍5❤4custom 52468942396436292373

21 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC≈3,010 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔥 27 октября в 19:00 — ежемесячные живые встречи стоиков в разных городах мира! Приглашаем всех — и тех, кто только начинает знакомство со стоицизмом, и тех, кто уже давно в компании Сенеки, Эпиктета и Марка Аврелия. Формат — живая беседа: обмениваемся мыслями, вместе разбираемся в понятиях. Вместе с амбассадорами Школы Стоицизма разберём 27-е письмо Сенеки к Луцилию. 📚 Перед встречей обязательно ознакомьтесь с т…

🔥10👍9❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @stoicism_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @stoicism_school as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀
@krasikovAlexey · 42,315
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова
@myshlenie_kurpatov · 42,870
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Федоренко Павел | Тревога FM
@szmclub · 32,147
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Школа Стоицизма” (@stoicism_school), 13,994 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoicism_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.