Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stomp Singapore

Channel

Stomp Singapore

@stompteam

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,625subscribers

+97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001177594571
TypeChannel
Username@stompteam
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stompteam

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,52517,62517,5757 August 2026 — 17,528 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,528 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,526 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,529 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,526 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,525 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,531 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,527 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,530 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,536 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,540 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,544 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,547 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,549 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,547 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,545 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,542 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,544 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,551 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,556 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,560 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,564 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,561 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,564 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,571 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,587 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,594 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,601 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,605 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,609 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,622 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,625 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,510–17,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:0017,625+3
17 Sept 2026, 03:2117,622+13
15 Sept 2026, 02:5817,609+4
13 Sept 2026, 12:3817,605+4
11 Sept 2026, 13:2117,601+7
9 Sept 2026, 00:3917,594+7
5 Sept 2026, 19:4117,587+16
3 Sept 2026, 18:3817,571+7
2 Sept 2026, 08:5817,564+3
1 Sept 2026, 12:0417,561-3
31 Aug 2026, 10:3617,564+4
30 Aug 2026, 11:0617,560+4
29 Aug 2026, 07:4317,556+5
28 Aug 2026, 07:4417,551+7
26 Aug 2026, 05:0817,544+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:1317,542-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:0317,545-2
22 Aug 2026, 07:2617,547-2
20 Aug 2026, 22:3317,549+2
19 Aug 2026, 22:3517,547first reading

Engagement

281 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 17,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
132 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
132
of 281 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 131 of 132 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held281 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total324,960
Reactions total4,805
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9,655 reactions across 280 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,18122.6%
🤬2,01520.9%
1,20312.5%
👎1,00810.4%
👍9499.83%
😢6777.01%
😱5856.06%
🤯3413.53%
🤔2882.98%
👏2172.25%
🥰1161.20%
🔥750.777%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 280 of the 281 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 281 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC267 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

S’porean calls out tourists for cutting queue, blocking the way and risking safety at Fort Canning Tree Tunnel “Some even climbed over the metal barriers to get better angles for their Instagram photos." 📸 https://stmp.sg/EWYa @stompteam

3 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC723 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‘Good’: 6-year-old’s 1-word response after PM Wong assures her she does not need his permission to remain youngest Sarah does not plan to write back to PM Wong. 📝 https://stmp.sg/HWHW @stompteam

🤣103🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,050 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Black smoke billows from Tampines shop after electrical box catches fire, 20 people evacuated SCDF extinguished the fire with a water jet 🔥 https://stmp.sg/Gyms @stompteam

👍5🤯1

3 Sept 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Stomper catching people drinking on MRT, man scolded for not giving up priority seat win August’s Hall of Fame Congrats! 🏅 https://stmp.sg/DkRo @stompteam

🤣10👍21

3 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,610 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ex-SQ stewardess finds love in Taiwan, now runs S’pore hawker stalls with chef husband while expecting first child “People think that cabin crew have a glamorous job. From the outside it looks like that, but (there’s) also all the hard work and sacrifices we make." 🤰 https://stmp.sg/vCM5 @stompteam

25🤣3👍1👎1🤔1

3 Sept 2026, 03:39 UTC≈1,670 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Meituan delivery rider says he flew to S’pore for S$454 to pick up S$13.50 worth of curry puffs “Rich and know what they want," said a netizen. ✈️ https://stmp.sg/9mWt @stompteam

👎8🤬4🤯43👍3🤣1

3 Sept 2026, 01:31 UTC≈1,810 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Sengkang resident throws bags of rubbish along shared corridor after dispute with neighbour over PMAs and missing parcel "...They’re giving me a lot of stress." 😖 https://stmp.sg/y2sL @stompteam

🤬19🤣64👍1👎1

2 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,260 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Motorcyclist steps in to direct vehicles after traffic lights fail at busy Hougang junction "Heroes don’t wear capes, but helmets." 👏 https://stmp.sg/txWR @stompteam

👍355🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,260 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

She was an air stewardess…then brain cancer changed everything. 🎥 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSVobS7jC/

12😢4🤔1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,090 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Stomper concerned after seeing dogs in drivers’ seats — not once but 5 times “It’s not a laughing matter." 🐶 https://stmp.sg/yXFe @stompteam

🤯10🤬6🤣5👎3

2 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,150 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‘You will achieve good things’: Man, 68, who perished in Lorong Lew Lian flat fire praised neighbour’s son hours before blaze Tears welled in the woman's eyes as she told reporters she was heartbroken by her neighbour’s sudden death. 😢 https://stmp.sg/MC8h @stompteam

😢26🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC≈2,200 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Man, 68, flung from seat after Tower Transit bus brakes suddenly, family upset over delayed updates The Stomper said his father momentarily lost consciousness. 😨 https://stmp.sg/jntwm @stompteam

😱21🤬6😢4🤣3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 281 posts we hold for @stompteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@stompteam edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Goody Feed SG
@goodyfeedsg · 38,695
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
LTASingapore
@LTASingapore · 36,006
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
TheSmartLocal
@TSLMedia · 46,212
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
MS News
@mustsharenews · 55,409
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
gov.sg
@Govsg · 239,193
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
CNA
@cnalatest · 225,881
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
TODAY
@todayonlinesg · 49,947
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
SG Full Time Jobs
@SgFullTimeAgency · 30,725
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
Skills & Workforce Development Agency
@Skills_Workforce_Development · 59,805
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
The Business Times
@BizTimes · 46,362
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
DollarsAndSense.sg
@dollarsandsense · 25,524
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stomp Singapore” (@stompteam), 17,625 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stompteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.