Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский

Channel

Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский

@stratlead

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,275subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002348962977
TypeChannel
Username@stratlead
DescriptionО лидерах, визионерах, предпринимателях, важных решениях в жизни и свежих идеях в области стратегии, которые помогают видеть больше и мыслить шире. Блог профессора СКОЛКОВО Алексея Улановского
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/stratlead

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2146,3046,2597 August 2026 — 6,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,245 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,244 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,241 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,221 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,214 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,223 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,221 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,231 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,224 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,231 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,217 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,214 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,299 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,304 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,296 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,278 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,281 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,275 subscribers6,2757 August 20263 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 88 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,201–6,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 04:186,275-6
31 Oct 2026, 00:556,281+3
27 Oct 2026, 22:446,278-18
24 Oct 2026, 23:586,296-8
21 Oct 2026, 18:186,304+5
18 Oct 2026, 16:496,299+85
15 Oct 2026, 06:296,214-3
12 Oct 2026, 03:416,217-14
5 Oct 2026, 04:596,231+7
26 Sept 2026, 23:386,224-7
17 Sept 2026, 09:176,231+10
13 Sept 2026, 01:596,221-2
8 Sept 2026, 22:366,223+9
3 Sept 2026, 10:566,214-7
30 Aug 2026, 20:066,221-6
27 Aug 2026, 19:246,227-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:456,228-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:346,231-10
17 Aug 2026, 15:536,241-3
14 Aug 2026, 03:366,244first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 6,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held37 (27 May 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total14,257
Reactions total353
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
70
Videos
18
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 39s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,054 reactions across 36 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤47545.1%
🔥34833.0%
👍12011.4%
👏524.93%
💯242.28%
❤‍🔥161.52%
🤔80.759%
🤩60.569%
😁30.285%
🙏10.095%
🤓10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,054 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 37 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stratlead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC476 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Что происходит со стратегией в военное время (вывод из глобальных исследований) Вооружённые конфликты снижают эффективность комплексного (стратегического) планирования и повышают значимость инкрементального (поэтапного) планирования у компаний, о чём свидетельствуют данные Hiatt and Sine (2014), полученные в ходе исследования 730 компаний в Колумбии в период гражданского и политического противостояния. В крайне нес…

❤7💯2🔥1

25 Oct 2026, 18:11 UTC958 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Великие психологи 20 века в лицах за 3 минуты На кампусе университета Саламанки набрел на длинный коридор с мировыми звездами психологии и уникальную коллекцию их артефактов и приборов для исследований с начала 20 века. Конечно же, тут далеко не все столпы. Но составить впечатление о красоте, масштабе, глубине и разнообразии психологи можно! Это мой ответ неучам, невежам и любителям хайпа - про то, является ли псих…

👍9❤6🔥5

25 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC914 views30 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Неожиданное открытие: в западных компаниях иногда приглашают антропологов (!) - чтоб они дали фидбэк о динамике или культуре компании. У нас для этих задач приглашают исключительно консультантов. А тут: приходит этнограф, делает полевые заметки, разговаривает внутри, изучает документы, артефакты, ритуалы, каждодневные практики. И по итогу проекта делает отчет со своими выводами. Вчера познакомился с таким одним антр…

❤15🔥10👍5

25 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC830 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤5💯3🔥3👍2

24 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC562 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤9👍5💯2

24 Oct 2026, 13:40 UTC857 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤13🔥9👏4

22 Oct 2026, 18:54 UTC≈1,010 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Еще немного идей со Strategic Management Society (Берлин, 2026), в которой участвую и на которой презентую свое исследование. Про нарциссизм руководителей 👑 Что он им дает и чему мешает. Олег Петренко - профессор и коллега из ун-та Оклахомы, один из ведущих экспертов в этой теме. С Олегом мы познакомились в этом году в Гонгконге и нас объединяет работа на стыке менеджмента и психологии. Полный ролик тут. Шер, лайк,…

🔥9❤6❤‍🔥5

20 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,170 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Заметки с полей Strategic Management Society 2026 (Берлин)

👍25❤15👏4🤩1

18 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,610 views52 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

С Доном Хамбриком (Donald C. Hambrick) - одним из пионеров и наиболее влиятельных исследователей стратегического лидерства. Я с ним познакомился несколько лет назад, когда написал ему и, к моему удивлению, он развернуто ответил. Это его последняя конференция, по его словам. Поэтому я решил поделиться некоторыми его идеями и находками исследований первых лиц организаций, обобщающих его длинную академ-карьеру. 1. Орг…

🔥26❤17👍9

18 Oct 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,010 views49 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤24🔥16👍7❤‍🔥1🤩1

12 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,480 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Топ-посты канала "Лидеры-стратеги" за все время Вдохновляющий и развивающий контент: 10 развивающих практик предпринимателей, новаторов, криэйтеров - сборка практик, делающих нас более укоренёнными, зрелыми, здоровыми. Фокус на решении vs фокус на проблеме. Как мыслить конструктивно? База от одного из обоснованных подходов в коучинге и психотерапии. Развивающие установки одного лидера-визионера. Принципы Питера Д…

🔥11❤5

8 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,420 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Как жить? Логика плана vs логика поиска Это оочень интересно – несколько заметок про то, как строится жизнь молодыми сегодня у нас в стране – из свежих исследований («Тревожное общество», РАН). Мне кажется, это интересно для понимания того, как молодежь решает проблемы адаптации к непредсказуемому будущему. Поисковая стратегия жизни vs прагматичная (Надежда Нартова, ВШЭ): Молодежь крупного города — «открытое буду…

❤19🔥3👍2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @stratlead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTCAnonymous Poll159 voters

Друзья, что вам интересно тут читать? Помогите мне, пожалуйста, лучше понимать ваш интерес и ожидания от контента (в комментариях тоже можно добавлять):

  1. Лидерство сегодня – идеи, концепции, практики45%
  2. Лидеры – люди, их психология, их истории38%
  3. Власть и влияние, авторитет33%
  4. Стратегия, стратегические выборы, принятие решений43%
  5. Идеи из малоизвестных у нас теорий организаций и менеджмента41%
  6. Групповая и организационная динамика: потаённая жизнь39%
  7. Жизнь в турбулентности и неопределенности, кризисы, кризис-менеджмент40%
  8. Интересное из психологии и психотерапии43%
  9. Личные стратегии, практики саморазвития, коучинг46%

The shares total 368%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский” (@stratlead), 6,275 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stratlead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.