Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский

Channel

Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский

@stratlead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,223subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002348962977
TypeChannel
Username@stratlead
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stratlead

Growth

6,2146,2486,2317 August 2026 — 6,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,245 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,244 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,241 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,221 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,214 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,223 subscribers6,2237 August 20268 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,209–6,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:366,223+9
3 Sept 2026, 10:566,214-7
30 Aug 2026, 20:066,221-6
27 Aug 2026, 19:246,227-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:456,228-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:346,231-10
17 Aug 2026, 15:536,241-3
14 Aug 2026, 03:366,244-1
10 Aug 2026, 23:346,245-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:276,248no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:036,248first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 37s
Average length
2m 49s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23253.0%
🔥13831.5%
👍4510.3%
💯173.88%
🤔30.685%
😁10.228%
🙏10.228%
🤓10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stratlead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC715 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кем быть хуже - лидером-нарциссом или лидером-психопатом? Возникновение нарциссизма и психопатии у лидеров можно проследить до нарушений раннего детского психологического развития: ▫️ Нарциссизм часто связывают с хрупкой структурой самооценки, которая гиперкомпенсируется грандиозностью и стремлением к совершенству (Kernberg, 1975; Kohut, 1977). В жизни нарциссические лидеры защищаются от переживаний стыда и собстве

💯10🔥54👍3🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Друзья, что вам интересно тут читать? Помогите мне, пожалуйста, лучше понимать ваш интерес и ожидания от контента (в комментариях тоже можно добавлять):

  1. Лидерство сегодня – идеи, концепции, практики45%
  2. Лидеры – люди, их психология, их истории38%
  3. Власть и влияние, авторитет33%
  4. Стратегия, стратегические выборы, принятие решений43%
  5. Идеи из малоизвестных у нас теорий организаций и менеджмента41%
  6. Групповая и организационная динамика: потаённая жизнь39%
  7. Жизнь в турбулентности и неопределенности, кризисы, кризис-менеджмент40%
  8. Интересное из психологии и психотерапии43%
  9. Личные стратегии, практики саморазвития, коучинг46%

The shares total 368%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,270 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

21🔥12

18 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,650 views21 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как обещал, анонс эфира: Мы живем в исторически предельной неопределенности и концентрации в моменте каскада кризисов. Эти кризисы влияют на наш способ жизни и образ будущего. На наши выборы и проекты, в которых мы готовы участвовать, на наши установки и эмоциональное состояние. На эфире мы вместе осмыслим то, как меняются наши установки и подходы совладания с непредсказуемостью на личном и организационном уровнях.

10🔥7👍4

17 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,220 views29 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

23🔥5🙏1

17 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,120 views22 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19🔥3

17 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC≈1,080 views20 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19👍1

17 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥158

15 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,310 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто здесь главный? Почему в компаниях путаются, кто принимает решения Сначала небольшой кейс. В одной технологической компании 12 топ-менеджеров собрались решить: вводить ли роль директора по инновациям. Права заранее распределили — финальное слово за CEO вместе с четырьмя ключевыми людьми (COO, HR-директор, главы двух бизнес-юнитов), остальных нужно было просто консультировать и информировать. Но на встречу пришли

8👍7🔥7💯2🤔1

6 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,360 views54 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sko_leadershipVideo

Алексей Улановский выступил на одной из ведущих мировых конференций по стратегическому менеджменту 28–30 июня в Гонконге прошла конференция Strategic Management Society (Общество стратегического менеджмента) — одна из ведущих международных научных конференций в области менеджмента с высшим академическим рейтингом A*. Приглашенным спикером конференции стал профессор Центра развития лидерства СКОЛКОВО Алексей Улановс

🔥3123

30 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,500 views24 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @skolkovo_esgVideo

📌Создание ценности или корпоративная самозащита? Управление взаимодействием с заинтересованными сторонами (или стейкхолдерами) часто определяют как заботу о клиентах, сотрудниках, партнерах и обществе. Но в реальности оно нередко работает как система корпоративной самозащиты. Алексей Улановский, академический директор Центра развития лидерства Школы управления СКОЛКОВО, делится наблюдением с конференции Strategic M

14🔥6💯3👍1

30 Jun 2026, 06:54 UTC≈1,360 views41 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

25🔥16

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @stratlead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTCAnonymous Poll159 voters

Друзья, что вам интересно тут читать? Помогите мне, пожалуйста, лучше понимать ваш интерес и ожидания от контента (в комментариях тоже можно добавлять):

  1. Лидерство сегодня – идеи, концепции, практики45%
  2. Лидеры – люди, их психология, их истории38%
  3. Власть и влияние, авторитет33%
  4. Стратегия, стратегические выборы, принятие решений43%
  5. Идеи из малоизвестных у нас теорий организаций и менеджмента41%
  6. Групповая и организационная динамика: потаённая жизнь39%
  7. Жизнь в турбулентности и неопределенности, кризисы, кризис-менеджмент40%
  8. Интересное из психологии и психотерапии43%
  9. Личные стратегии, практики саморазвития, коучинг46%

The shares total 368%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лидеры-стратеги | Алексей Улановский” (@stratlead), 6,223 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stratlead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.