Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -391. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,186–9,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 08:41
9,245
-13
3 Nov 2026, 12:39
9,258
-17
31 Oct 2026, 19:09
9,275
-17
28 Oct 2026, 12:50
9,292
-12
25 Oct 2026, 06:49
9,304
-20
22 Oct 2026, 10:17
9,324
-12
19 Oct 2026, 10:14
9,336
-20
16 Oct 2026, 11:55
9,356
-13
13 Oct 2026, 06:49
9,369
-26
7 Oct 2026, 05:41
9,395
-30
30 Sept 2026, 07:22
9,425
-58
19 Sept 2026, 15:37
9,483
-13
15 Sept 2026, 07:57
9,496
-12
12 Sept 2026, 02:15
9,508
-33
7 Sept 2026, 20:20
9,541
-17
2 Sept 2026, 18:25
9,558
-11
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
9,569
-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:27
9,571
-13
24 Aug 2026, 14:04
9,584
-8
20 Aug 2026, 13:35
9,592
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.41%
avg views ÷ 9,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
870
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.233%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
89 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
23,501
Reactions total
36
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 11:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈5
Links
≈2,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 51 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
70
60.3%
🔥
21
18.1%
👍
19
16.4%
👎
4
3.45%
👌
1
0.862%
😁
1
0.862%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📈 Nifty climbed 8.6% this week to 25,030, its strongest weekly gain since February 2021. Crude oil fell over 16% and foreign investors returned as buyers with ₹45,960 crore of inflows.
🔍 Highlight of the week: the rally favoured large caps. The Nifty 50 gained 8.6%, while the Midcap 100 rose 5.8% and the Smallcap 100 just 2.8%.
This week in The Weekly Edge, we’ve also covered the top-performing sectors, the US midt…
🪔 *Muhurat Trading is this Sunday*
📅 8th Nov | ⏰ 2:20 – 3:40 PM
Running algos on Stratzy? Here's what you need to know before the session: what your algos will do, what they won't, and what you can do yourself.
Read it here before Sunday 👇
https://community.stratzy.in/t/muhurat-trading-2026-what-it-is-and-how-your-algos-will-behave/1549
⏰ We're going live in 30 minutes!
Our webinar on Understanding Risk in Algo Trading starts at 4:00 PM today.
📅 Today, 4th November
⏰ 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM
📍 YouTube Live
Join us to understand the risks involved in algo trading and how to manage them better.
🔴 Join the webinar on YouTube live at 4 PM:
(https://www.youtube.com/live/Ly6UbWKEf4Y?si=UH8SSybfZnvofo_V)
See you shortly!
Team Stratzy
📢 Our Algo Deep Dive Has Been Rescheduled to Today!
Due to unavoidable reasons, we couldn't host the webinar as planned. But we're back on, and we're looking forward to seeing you today!
This time, we're taking a closer look at Managing Risk in Algo Trading.
Join us to understand how to monitor an actively trading algo, which key risk metrics to track, and how disciplined risk management can help navigate changing…
Good Morning!☀️
Markets are showing signs of recovery as crude eases and geopolitical talks offer some relief but will it sustain?
Watch the key market levels, global cues, FII/DII activity and a quick Market outlook to help you start the day informed.
Read the full outlook before the market opens: https://community.stratzy.in/t/9-15-market-view-04-11/1457
AI is attracting trillions of dollars in investments, but is the financial reality keeping pace with the hype?
From market corrections and workforce changes to rising costs and questions around profitability, take a closer look at what’s unfolding behind the AI boom.
Is AI building the next wave of economic growth, or are investors getting ahead of themselves?
Read our latest article, “AI’s Trillion Dollar Reality…
Crude prices are easing, geopolitical tensions show signs of cooling, and market sentiment is improving. But can the recovery sustain itself?
Watch the key market levels, global cues, FII/DII activity and a quick Market outlook to help you start the day informed.
Read the full outlook before the market opens: https://community.stratzy.in/t/9-15-market-view-03-11/1424
Good Morning!☀️
Markets are showing signs of recovery as crude eases and geopolitical talks offer some relief but can the momentum hold?
Watch the key market levels, global cues, FII/DII activity and a quick Market outlook to help you start the day informed.
Read the full outlook before the market opens: https://community.stratzy.in/t/9-15-market-view-02-11/1400
Good Morning!☀️
Will Nifty hold its key support, or is more downside ahead? Know what's coming with global cues, key levels, FII/DII activity and market triggers
Read the full outlook before the market opens: https://community.stratzy.in/t/9-15-market-view-30-10/1364?u=aryan
📢 Another Algo Deep Dive This Friday!
This time, we’re taking a closer look at Managing Risk in Algo Trading
Join us for a deep dive into how to monitor an actively trading algo, the key risk metrics to keep an eye on, and how disciplined risk management helps navigate changing market conditions.
🎙️ Speaker: Nikhil Bhandari, Chief Operating Officer at Stratzy, with 10+ years of market experience.
📅 Friday, 30 Oct…
❤3👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @stratzy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Have you ever considered deploying an algo but decided not to?
Yes74%
No26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MarketWolf - Stocks & Options @MarketWolfApp · 24,470 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 September 2026
Angel One Research @AngelOneAdvisory · 320,412 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
INDmoney @indmoneyofficial · 27,657 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Dhan - Stock Trading & Investing @JoinDhan · 50,353 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stratzy Family” (@stratzy), 9,245 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stratzy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.