Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STRAX BACK-UP

Channel

STRAX BACK-UP

@straxmod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40,000subscribers

+363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934101499
TypeChannel
Username@straxmod
DescriptionJust Back-up Channel...
Created29 September 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/straxmod

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,63740,01039,823.56 August 2026 — 39,637 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,654 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,658 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,668 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,686 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,718 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,753 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39,783 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,833 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,842 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,844 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,839 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,884 subscribers22 August 2026 — 39,919 subscribers23 August 2026 — 39,932 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,905 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,882 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,895 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,899 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,910 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,901 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,894 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,903 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,924 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,985 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,980 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,987 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,974 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,990 subscribers16 September 2026 — 40,010 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40,000 subscribers40,0006 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +363. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,581–40,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:0040,000-10
16 Sept 2026, 10:0140,010+20
14 Sept 2026, 15:0039,990+16
13 Sept 2026, 04:3839,974-13
11 Sept 2026, 06:5839,987+7
8 Sept 2026, 09:0139,980-5
5 Sept 2026, 03:1839,985+61
3 Sept 2026, 09:3339,924+21
2 Sept 2026, 04:5539,903+9
31 Aug 2026, 01:2539,894-7
30 Aug 2026, 03:3339,901-9
29 Aug 2026, 01:3739,910+11
28 Aug 2026, 01:5439,899+4
27 Aug 2026, 04:0239,895+13
26 Aug 2026, 04:3239,882-23
25 Aug 2026, 01:0739,905-27
23 Aug 2026, 11:2839,932+13
22 Aug 2026, 00:1439,919+35
20 Aug 2026, 18:3739,884+45
19 Aug 2026, 19:5239,839first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 29 September 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,468 reactions across 2 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,32553.7%
👍2439.85%
🔥1486.00%
🙏1315.31%
😍1255.06%
👏1124.54%
🤔1064.29%
🥰732.96%
522.11%
🎉512.07%
🎅321.30%
🤓251.01%
💯180.729%
👨‍💻170.689%
💅100.405%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2023 to 11 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Nov 2025, 02:50 UTC≈130,000 views913 reactionsread 22 September 2026

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⚠️Our Old Strax 3.0 got Banned Due to Copyright 🚫 Join New Channel - Click Here ✅ Share This New Channel to Everyone #NewChannel #StraxMod

515🙏108👍77👏58🤔39🤓25🔥23🥰23

15 Aug 2025, 06:49 UTC≈197,000 views1,555 reactionsread 22 September 2026

👑 Official STRAX Channel Here👇 🟢STRAX MAIN ➡️Click Here to Join 🆕 STRAX 2.0 ➡️Click Here To Join 😀STRAX 3.0 ➡️Click Here To Join 👆👆 JOIN ALL CHANNELS 👆👆 🎖️ MOD REQUEST/COMPLAINT/SUPPORT/CHAT etc... 👇👇 https://t.me/strax_mods https://t.me/strax_mods

810👍166🔥125😍125🤔67👏5452🎉51

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @straxmod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STRAX BACK-UP” (@straxmod), 40,000 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/straxmod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.