Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IthinkLondonismyhome

Channel

IthinkLondonismyhome

@stx_20

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

-4,562 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003872241206
TypeChannel
Username@stx_20
Created27 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stx_20

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

632,93416,4709 August 2026 — 4,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,214 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,791 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,764 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,978 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,686 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,202 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,702 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,964 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,577 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,796 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,825 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,120 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,934 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6 subscribers9 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 39 days, net -4,562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:556-32,928
14 Sept 2026, 13:5932,934+4,814
13 Sept 2026, 02:0028,120+7,295
11 Sept 2026, 04:1720,825+4,029
8 Sept 2026, 06:3916,796+3,219
4 Sept 2026, 22:2013,577+3,613
1 Sept 2026, 04:189,964+1,262
29 Aug 2026, 14:288,702-500
26 Aug 2026, 04:179,202+2,516
23 Aug 2026, 03:536,686+708
19 Aug 2026, 21:385,978+214
16 Aug 2026, 21:065,764-27
13 Aug 2026, 16:475,791+577
10 Aug 2026, 17:435,214+646
9 Aug 2026, 18:174,568first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41000.0%
avg views ÷ 6 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held43 (27 May 202625 August 2026)
Views total22,140
Reactions total478
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,991 reactions across 32 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭68734.5%
🍓42821.5%
💘30915.5%
934.67%
🔥804.02%
💋683.42%
❤‍🔥562.81%
custom 5981127845311683072422.11%
412.06%
custom 5222453723950765835301.51%
🗿291.46%
custom 6042108383685777709241.21%
custom 5812191671865055119221.10%
😇221.10%
🌚160.804%
💔130.653%
custom 5438496463044752972100.502%
😍60.301%
🕊50.251%
💅30.151%
3 further kinds70.352%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,991 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,019
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 42 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
90
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stx_20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈2,350 views100 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓67🔥12🌚8🕊5😭4💘31

Signed 𓏺 َِ𝗻 .

24 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈2,740 views49 reactions51 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭33🍓12😍4

24 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,770 views60 reactions61 Starsread 29 August 2026

متوفر تمويل اعضاء متفاعلين وثابتين للقنوات ✔️🔥. 800 عضو = 5$ اسيا . 1400 عضو = 10 اسيا . 2800 عضو = 15 اسيا . 5000 عضو = 20$ اسيا . ضمان الاعضاء سريعين وحقيقين ومتفاعلين تمويل قنوات ^ كروبات . التواصل > @e2eo6 ✅. المحضورين > @ZJYGysbot 🎁 .

😭53🍓5💘2

24 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,480 views36 reactions31 Starsread 29 August 2026

ربما نلتقي بعد فترة، وسيكون قلبي مطمئناً عندما ألتقي بك🤍

😭35🍓1

24 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈2,410 views40 reactions54 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

كِلشِي ضِدي حتّى هَذا الليل ضِدي مِن بديَت أسهَر غُفة وخَلانِي وَحَدي ؟

😭35🍓2😍2💘1

24 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC≈2,280 views66 reactions31 Starsread 29 August 2026

الحمدلله على كل نعمٍة أحاطت بي .

😭46🍓13💘6👍1

24 Aug 2026, 00:37 UTC≈2,250 views48 reactions90 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

"أخسرها".

💘38😭9🍓1

Signed .-

23 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,500 views43 reactions30 Starsread 29 August 2026

أنفِق مالك على الأشياء التي يمكن شراؤها بالمال وأنفِق وقتك على الأشياء التي لا يشتريها المال .

🍓28💘8😭7

Signed - YoTwx

23 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,360 views36 reactions65 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🦋

🍓28💘4😭3👍1

Signed - YoTwx

18 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈5,430 views106 reactions82 Starsread 29 August 2026

متوفر تمويل ( تثبيت قناتك بروليت ) . 40 عضو > 30 نجمة . 75 عضو > 50 نجمة . 110 عضو > 75 نجمة . 130 عضو > 100 نجمة . تواصل > @e2eo6 . محضورين : @ZJYGysbot .

💘82😭16🍓8

18 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈5,090 views82 reactions64 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

يَا حُلْوَةُ العَينِ رَأْفًا إِنَّني بَشَرٌ ‏لَا يَرحَمُ اللُّه مَن لَم يَرحَمِ البَشَرا ‏بُلِيْتُ بِالعِشْقِ حَتَّى صِرْتُ عَابِدَهُ ‏وَصَارَ أُنْسِي وَذِكْري عِنْدَمَا وَغَرا .

😭61💘11🍓8🌚1😇1

18 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈4,350 views64 reactions20 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

إني مشتاگلك بس المَن أحجي ؟ چبير أهلي وصعب لو يسمَعوني أبچي .

😭52🍓7💘4😇1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @stx_20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@stx_20 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IthinkLondonismyhome” (@stx_20), 6 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stx_20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.