Channel
@subtitle_face
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003850353201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @subtitle_face |
| Created | 1 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/subtitle_face |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 121 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 120 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 121 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 117 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 116 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 113 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 113 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
75 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 34.7% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Лучшие батальные сцены в истории кино К нолановской "Одиссее" много претензий в части батальных и экшн сцен. Мол сцены боев поставлены небрежно, нет де нужного масштаба, сплошной де сумбур. Отчасти - только отчасти - я с этим согласна. Я вообще на большинстве экшн-сцен в современном кино скучаю, тут кейс "Одиссеи" не показателен. У меня есть личный топ-2 лучших батальных сцен в истории кино. Где экшн работает не …
🔥8❤1
🎤Обсуждаем "Одиссею" Нолана максимально пристрастно и со всеми спойлерами 💙😈 Пробую формат подкаста, очень нервничаю 🙃 напишите потом, как оно слушалось 03:08 — Почему зрители ждали от Нолана совсем другое кино 05:18 — Что общего у Одиссея и Оппенгеймера 08:23 — Гомер первым придумал Нолана 10:14 — Агамемнон-Бэтмен — костюмы не исторические и это круто 15:29 — Лупита Нионго — лучшее кастинговое решение 18:33 — …
❤11❤🔥3
Разброс рекомендаций в этом канале впечатляет даже автора🙈 От "что посмотреть с ребенком" до "НИ В КОЕМ СЛУЧАЕ не смотрите это с ребенком, но вам понравится"
😁9
Давно меня так не пробирало, друзья. Категорически рекомендую сериал "Получеловек" (Half man). Его сделал Ричард Гэдд - автор того самого "Олененка" (мини-сериал 2024 года про комика-неудачника и его сталкершу, который взорвал все рейтинги). Гэдд снова здесь и шоураннер, и сценарист, и актер. И божечки, в каждой из ипостасей это талантище. "Получеловек" (а корректнее было бы "Полчеловека") — это история двух назва…
🔥12
Не только "Головоломка". Мультфильмы для эмоционального интеллекта, которые вы могли пропустить Ходили с Андрюхой на новый пиксаровский мульт "Прыгуны". Я в очередной раз восхитилась, какими крутыми делают современные мультфильмы для развития эмоционального и социального интеллекта. Для ребенка — развлечение + образование, эдьютеймент. Для взрослого развлечение + терапия. Часто мультики поднимают такие темы, до ко…
❤7❤🔥5
Проект Аве Мария // Проект "Конец света" // Project Hail Mary, 2026 Душеспасительная инъекция добра и человечности для всех, кто как-то старается держаться. ❗️Обзор со спойлерами Школьный учитель естествознания приходит в себя внутри космического корабля. Он единственный выживший из всего экипажа корабля "Аве Мария", который находится черт-те знает где в очень далекой звездной системе. Загадочные микроорганизмы по…
🔥10❤6💘1
Завела этот канал, чтобы иметь легальное место для моих развесистых кино- и сериальных впечатлений. Вообще мы со Стасом хотели вести подкаст. Но подкасты я делать не умею. А тексты писать — умею. Так что решила начать со знакомого. Добро пожаловать, дорогие друзья. Недрузьям об этом канале узнать пока не откуда 😄
❤1👍1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @subtitle_face. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лицо с субтитрами” (@subtitle_face), 121 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/subtitle_face.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.