Channel
@such_lena
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
659subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687909328 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @such_lena |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/such_lena |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 659 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 658 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 656 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 653 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 653 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
231 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5300918288207849713 | 231 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @such_lena. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 December 2025 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Так выглядел план монтажа по предыдущему видео про Джона Гарфилда. Сейчас составляю такой же по новому материалу, который примерно в два раза больше, так что уложиться в месяц я даже не пытаюсь. Но новому видео быть, так что please stand by!
custom 530091828820784971335
Signed elena ｡･:*
За что на меня в леттере подписался шон бейкер я так и не поняла, а вот что леттеру понравился мой рилзик мне очень приятно. 😭😭😭 слава пришла внезапно, но слава богу в нашем болоте тг канале с пятью землекопами как всегда все тихо и без инцидентов💖
custom 530091828820784971374
Signed elena ｡･:*
☀️ Backrooms (2026) оказался одним из тех фильмов, которые мне захотелось пересмотреть сразу после титров. Это на 100% мой тип хоррора: когда тебя пугают не громкими звуками или темнотой, а мелкими деталями, создающими эффект зловещей долины. Это фильм про людей, которые перемалывают, перемусоливают проблемы в голове до тех пор, пока их восприятие себя и реальности не искажается до неузнаваемости. Это фильм для люде…
custom 530091828820784971331
Signed elena ｡･:*
🤩 Silly movies are back! Вчера на ночь посмотрела захваленный всеми Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie (2025), после чего ко сну отходила с широченной улыбкой — и с ней же сегодня проснулась. Это фильм того самого жанра легкой, свежей комедии, которого мне так не хватает в современном кино; жанра, который я уже много лет оплакиваю как вымерший. А еще, возможно, это лучший ремейк Back to the Future Part II, которы…
custom 530091828820784971319
Signed elena ｡･:*
🩷 Chacun son cinema вновь пригласили меня поучаствовать в сборнике рекомендаций за прошедший год с критерием меньше 100k просмотров на letterboxd. Я пошла по пути наименьшего сопротивления и собрала список азиатских фильмов — большинство из них без труда проходят по этому критерию (У Ренуара — 7k просмотров, у Региона Кинки — вообще меньше пяти). В конце все же затесался один американец, но давайте это останется наши…
custom 530091828820784971324
Signed elena ｡･:*
💙 У леттербокса всегда очень скудные и нерепрезентативные итоги года (я не стала их ждать — у тех, кто выплачивает дань, статы видно круглый год), так что я сделала свои собственные, с теми именами и цифрами, которые считаю важными. Возможно, это станет традицией. А возможно, и нет. Тут явно видно, что в этом году я смотрела очень много китайских, а точнее — гонконгских фильмов, но в топ все же протиснулся один фильм…
custom 530091828820784971337
Signed elena ✧₊˚⊹
🖤 ЗА ЧТО МЫ ЛЮБИМ ФИЛЬМЫ ДЭВИДА ЛИНЧА Перед скорым закрытием нашего долгого, местами изнурительного, но такого магического, чувственного и сновидческого тематического сезона Дэвида Линча в киноклубе я попросил десять уважаемых коллег-админов, кому небезразлично творчество иконы американского инди-кино, рассказать, а если точнее, поделиться любовью к десяти фильмам великого автора. Деда Линч, спасибо, что снял ровно…
custom 530091828820784971311
Signed elena ✧₊˚⊹
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @such_lena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
3 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“световая простокваша” (@such_lena), 659 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/such_lena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.