Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 36 days, net -424. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,823–12,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 06:56
11,887
-25
16 Sept 2026, 02:59
11,912
-20
14 Sept 2026, 08:42
11,932
-15
12 Sept 2026, 17:17
11,947
-12
10 Sept 2026, 17:21
11,959
-33
7 Sept 2026, 13:00
11,992
-41
4 Sept 2026, 12:57
12,033
-18
3 Sept 2026, 02:39
12,051
-23
2 Sept 2026, 01:17
12,074
-14
1 Sept 2026, 00:16
12,088
-6
31 Aug 2026, 02:44
12,094
-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:19
12,099
-11
29 Aug 2026, 02:14
12,110
-14
28 Aug 2026, 02:24
12,124
-6
27 Aug 2026, 01:25
12,130
-11
26 Aug 2026, 00:11
12,141
-17
24 Aug 2026, 22:34
12,158
-27
23 Aug 2026, 06:56
12,185
-21
21 Aug 2026, 21:09
12,206
-12
20 Aug 2026, 20:25
12,218
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.19%
avg views ÷ 11,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
498
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.803%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
27 (26 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
498
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 57s
Average length
3m 19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
45
72.6%
👏
7
11.3%
👍
3
4.84%
🔥
3
4.84%
😁
3
4.84%
🎉
1
1.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#قلة_الغيره_وانعدامها؟!
واحدة من الحاجات البقت منتشرة ومزعجة، ظاهرة تصوير الراجل لي مرتو، والاستعراض بيها أو طلوع الترند، أو يعمل بيها محتوي أيا كان نوعو شنو !
للأسف ناس كتيرة بقت تسابق قطار التريندات والشوفونيه، وبقت القيم والأخلاق في الحضيض إلا من رحم الله، ياخي مرتك وعرضك تقعد تعرض فيها للناس ؟!
دا غير توابع التصرف ده من المشاكل والطلاقات وخراب البيوت، والعين حق كما قال : رسول الله صل الله عليه وسلم.
واذ…
لا توجد امرأة عنيدة!
لكن توجد امرأة تشعر أنها ندٌّ للرجل، فترفض قوامته، فيتولد عن هذا الرفض النفسي عناد دائم.
فالعناد ثمرة الندية.
فكما لا يمكن أن يعاند موظفٌ مديره، لا يمكن أن تعاند المرأة زوجها إن فهمت القوامة.
نعم، يمكن أن تذهب بلبّه، وتملك عليه قلبه، لكن لا يمكنها أن تعانده وهي تعتقد أنه سبب جنتها ونارها.
فإن قلت:
من أين تولدت الندية؟
فأقول لك:
من المساواة.
ولذلك عالج القرآن كل هذا بقوله:
﴿بِمَا فَضَّلَ…
منقول👇
وإني محدثك حديث محب ناصح ومخبرك أني جرّبت كل اللذات فما وجدت أروع ولا أدهش ولا أعذب ولا أجمل ولا ألذ في حياتي كلها من حفظ القرآن ياصديقي ... حين يجري على لسانك دون عناء ، ويصحبك في طريقك، وتقوم به في آناء ليلك ونهارك فتلك حكايات لا شبيه لها في زمانك ، فدونك الحياة ..
#يا_صاحبي_كيف_حالك_مع_القرآن
عموما يعني أي كلام لقيتو في عرض ... حتى لو الزول دة أكبر مخالفيك ..
طواااالي أبعد منو ..
الخلافات تحل في ميادينها ما بالطعن في الأعراض ..
وتذكر "كل المسلم على المسلم حرام دمه وماله وعرضه "
"ومن تتبع عورة امرئ تتبع الله عورته ومن تتبع الله عورته فضحه ولو في عقر داره"
بالمناسبة أصلًا الهجوم على الشيوخ العندهم تأثير، الهدف منه في أحيان كثيرة ما بكون الشيخ نفسه ..
بل هدف العلمانيين وغيرهم من المجرمين إنهم يخلوك تكره المشايخ ديل، وبالتالي تكره الإسلام وتبعد عن الدين ..
ولسه حيستمر الهجوم عليهم وعلى أي شيخ ليهو تأثير، خاصة لو كان ليه تأثير على الشباب ..
#خليك_واعي
خلال شهر واحد فقط:
زلزال في المكسيك ١٧ يوليو
زلزال في البيرو ١٩ يوليو
زلزال في تكساس، أمريكا ٢٣ يوليو
زلزال في اليابان ٢٨ يوليو
زلزال في إيطاليا ٣١ يوليو
زلزال في مصر ٣ اغسطس
زلزال في كولومبيا ١٠ اغسطس
زلزال في إسبانيا ١٤ اغسطس
زلزال في إندونيسيا ١٥ اغسطس
وقبل ذلك زلزالين كبيرين في فنزويلا ٢٤ يونيو
لم نشهد هذا الكم الكبير من الزلازل في فترة زمنية قصيرة.
نسأل الله السلامة والعفو والعافية.
الحرب الآن على الشباب
أسوأ من حرب الجنجويد علينا
دخلوا عليهم من باب المخدرات
ثم نشروا الصور والمقاطع الإباحية في كل مكان
ثم زينوا ويسروا لهم الزنا
وانتقلوا إلى شراء بعضهم ليشيعوا الفاحشة واللواط
وأدخلوا عليهم الإلحاد
الشباب هم حملة راية الإسلام
وهم من يدافعون عن دعوة التوحيد
وهم قادة البلاد مستقبلا بإذن الله
المحافظة عليهم ضرورة دينية وأخلاقية
علينا أن نقف سدا منيعا ضد ما يحاك بهم
حظر النقاب و رسالة للجامعة الوطنية ..
فضيلة الشيخ الدكتور عبدالحفيظ العدسي حفظه الله ورعاه ..
👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @sudaniatm140. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مروان الشيخ 🇸🇩 @MM7rwan · 53,729 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
الخرطوم مقبرة وبل الجنجويد ✊️ @Sudaninblo12 · 92,388 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
القوات المسلحة السودانية 🇸🇩 @draculavladimirjezzy · 36,891 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
أنصار القوات المسلحة السودانية @alagcd · 122,090 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“السودانية” (@sudaniatm140), 11,887 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sudaniatm140.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.