Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for - سُـكـر 🍭.

Channel

- سُـكـر 🍭.

@sug_ar97

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,669subscribers

-709 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001455078410
TypeChannel
Username@sug_ar97
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sug_ar97

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,66917,37817,023.510 August 2026 — 17,378 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,378 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,356 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,347 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,314 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,283 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,261 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,240 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,229 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,214 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,195 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,172 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,142 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,100 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,083 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,066 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,045 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,024 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,013 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,993 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,966 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,958 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,940 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,907 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,879 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,804 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,763 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,733 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,711 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,669 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 39 days, net -709. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,563–17,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:3716,669-42
15 Sept 2026, 19:5616,711-22
14 Sept 2026, 01:3816,733-30
12 Sept 2026, 05:3616,763-41
10 Sept 2026, 00:5916,804-75
6 Sept 2026, 19:3716,879-28
4 Sept 2026, 10:1516,907-33
3 Sept 2026, 00:3716,940-18
2 Sept 2026, 00:0316,958-8
1 Sept 2026, 02:0416,966-27
30 Aug 2026, 22:4616,993-20
29 Aug 2026, 23:0517,013-11
29 Aug 2026, 01:5517,024-21
28 Aug 2026, 04:1717,045-21
27 Aug 2026, 02:4517,066-17
26 Aug 2026, 03:2817,083-17
25 Aug 2026, 02:4417,100-42
23 Aug 2026, 15:3817,142-30
22 Aug 2026, 04:2717,172-23
20 Aug 2026, 17:3717,195first reading

Engagement

126 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.71%
avg views ÷ 16,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
618
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
37
of 126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held126 (9 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total22,871
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC373 viewsread 3 September 2026

مُدهشةٌ أنتِ كأنكِ عالم من الحلوى .

1 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC372 viewsread 3 September 2026

‏جميلاتٌ هُنّ بلا شك لكنكِ الخُلاصة .

1 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC391 viewsread 3 September 2026

كلُّ شيءٍ مُعرَّضٌ لسوءِ الفَهم ، حتّى صَمتُك .

1 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC387 viewsread 3 September 2026

‏رغم كل ما حدث ما زلت ألمع، ولم أكُف يومًا عن مدّ ضوئي لكل من طرق بابي منطفئًا .

1 Sept 2026, 01:06 UTC432 viewsread 3 September 2026

هلا أتيـتَ الى الحديقة؟ أود ان تراكَ الورود .

31 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC505 viewsread 3 September 2026

‏نظنها أيام كثيرة ، ولكنها في الحقيقة يوم واحد يتكرر على الدوام .

Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @sug_ar97. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

.
@thrthrat13 · 112,256
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
خواطر , رسايل , عبارات حب
@wFYYY · 256,789
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
ترند شكو ماكو
@iq1_iq · 319,817
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
قناة تجميل الأنف للبروفيسور باعث رواشدة
@SSEN2 · 48,731
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
وَمَا كَانَ رَبُّكَ نَسِيًّا :
@ASH_TI · 25,344
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
R . Z . ❤ M
@rubai5 · 35,446
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“- سُـكـر 🍭.” (@sug_ar97), 16,669 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sug_ar97.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.