Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SAMADHAAN - Current Affairs - Prelims & Mains - Sunya IAS

Channel

SAMADHAAN - Current Affairs - Prelims & Mains - Sunya IAS

@sunyaias_CA

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,774subscribers

+919 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685300079
TypeChannel
Username@sunyaias_CA
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sunyaias_CA

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@sunyaiasbrahmastra/22903 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC@sunyaias_CA/1993 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC1.002.9 hours
@sunyaiasbrahmastra/22933 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC@sunyaias_CA/1997 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@sunyaiasbrahmastra/22944 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC@sunyaias_CA/1998 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@sunyaiasbrahmastra/22954 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC@sunyaias_CA/1999 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@sunyaias_CA/2004 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC@sunyaiasbrahmastra/23005 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC1.0072 seconds
@sunyaias_CA/2014 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC@sunyaiasbrahmastra/23087 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sunyaiasbrahmastra9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–3)
@CsatSunyaIAS8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–2)
@sunyaiasgs7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–1)
@sunyanotes506 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@sunyanotes50 (6–0)
@sunyaiasdelhi5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @sunyanotes50. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,83813,14112,489.56 August 2026 — 11,855 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,855 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,325 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,321 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,295 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,273 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,248 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,226 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,219 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,200 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,195 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,182 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,168 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,139 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,132 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,315 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,553 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,949 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,141 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,138 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,124 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,113 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,095 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,051 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,039 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,027 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,013 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,992 subscribers28 September 2026 — 12,893 subscribers5 October 2026 — 12,825 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,757 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,835 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,834 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,855 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,852 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,843 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,841 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,836 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,831 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,828 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,841 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,843 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,834 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,825 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,818 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,808 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,797 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,799 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,798 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,794 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,796 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,797 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,787 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,786 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,774 subscribers12,7746 August 20268 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net +919. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,643–13,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 02:1112,774-12
6 Nov 2026, 21:4512,786-1
5 Nov 2026, 19:1712,787-10
4 Nov 2026, 17:3612,797+1
3 Nov 2026, 14:4412,796+2
2 Nov 2026, 12:4512,794-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:4112,798-1
31 Oct 2026, 07:2912,799+2
30 Oct 2026, 09:0612,797-11
29 Oct 2026, 06:1912,808-10
28 Oct 2026, 02:3812,818-7
27 Oct 2026, 00:5412,825-9
26 Oct 2026, 00:4612,834-9
25 Oct 2026, 03:1812,843+2
24 Oct 2026, 00:1712,841+13
23 Oct 2026, 03:0712,828-3
22 Oct 2026, 02:3612,831-5
20 Oct 2026, 23:0612,836-5
20 Oct 2026, 00:3712,841-2
18 Oct 2026, 22:2012,843first reading

Engagement

163 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.27%
avg views ÷ 12,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
546
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.302%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 163 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held163 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total24,567
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 19:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈767
Videos
≈13
Links
≈1,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 47 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6068.2%
🔥2528.4%
🤯33.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 163 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 163 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC62 viewsread 8 November 2026

On this Auspicious Day and Time, We proudly Announce our NEXT State PCS Vertical. TGPSC - TELANGANA PSC The entire SUNYA IAS team would be part of it to Ensure that you have the BEST SUPPORT AVAILABLE EVER. PS: Notification may be out within the next few months. https://t.me/tgpsc_telangana_sunyaias

8 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC153 viewsread 8 November 2026

20% OFF - ENDS TODAY 🔥🔥 PRELIMS (GS), CSAT & OPTIONAL

8 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC154 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

LAST DAY - 20% OFF - ENDS TODAY LOWEST PRICE EVER: Diwali Offer PRELIMS - GS - 2027 💫 SAMBHAV 2027: CLICK HERE 💫 Prelims BootCamp Batch: CLICK 💫 PRP(Daily Test,Daily Rank): CLICK 💫 MANTHAN Test Series: CLICK 💫 PRELIMS MAGIC: CLICK CSAT BATCHES 2027 💫 CSAT Batch:CLICK HERE 💫 CSAT PIE (Test Series): CLICK 💫 CSAT Magic: Q Bank: CLICK YEARLONG BATCHES 💫 OPTIONAL 300+: CLICK HERE 💫 BRAHMASTRA 2027: CLICK HERE 💫 BRAHM…

8 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC204 viewsread 8 November 2026

APPSC - Andhra Pradesh PSC - https://t.me/Andhrapradeshpcs_appsc

8 Nov 2026, 03:37 UTC289 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Wishing you all a very happy Diwali ! 🪔 May this Diwali illuminate your path to success. Wishing you happiness in life, clarity in thoughts and success in every examination. Enjoy the festival :) With Loads of Love Team Sunya IAS

❤1

7 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC404 viewsread 8 November 2026

SAMBHAV 2027: Lowest Price Online: ₹36,495/- Offline: ₹ 48,297/- DIWALI OFFER PRICE? CHECK OUT at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtoNGd55Jb8

7 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC436 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📌️️️️️️Agentic AI | ICA BATCH 2027 ✍️Context: Recently, CERT-In lays out security norms for Agentic AI systems. ✍️What?: AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making, action-taking, and adaptive learning in dynamic environments. ✍️Nature: More advanced than Generative AI (GenAI). ✍️Working: Agentic AI moves beyond static, single-turn prompts through 4 primary design patterns = Perceive → Reason → Act → Learn ✍️I…

7 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC384 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a) 1 and 2 only29%
  2. (b) 2 and 3 only36%
  3. (c) 1 and 3 only11%
  4. (d) 1, 2 and 324%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC367 viewsread 8 November 2026

Q. With reference to Special Summary Revision (SSR) and Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, consider the following statements: 1. SSR involves updating the existing electoral roll, whereas SIR involves preparing the electoral roll afresh. 2. SSR is a routine annual exercise, whereas SIR is undertaken whenever directed by the ECI. 3. House-to-house enumeration is a feature of the announced SSR proc…

7 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC369 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

PRELIMS REVISION PROGRAM: PRP 2027 | Starts 23 November #DND DAILY TEST, DAILY RANK Program with Advance Mindset to Diagnose and Bring Consistency. A perfect program to Consolidate & Revise your ENTIRE SYLLABUS through 👉 Daily Tests 👉 Daily Explanation 👉 Daily Ranks Register at: https://www.sunyaias.com/subscription-details/prelims-revision-program-prp-2027-daily-tests Query: 9311470635 or @sunyacare

7 Nov 2026, 02:47 UTC397 viewsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @sambhavsunyaias

https://youtu.be/vtoNGd55Jb8?si=yGmbkyav2u4DqCwl 🧨DIWALI OFFER ENDING SOON 🔥SAMBHAV 2027 - PRELIMS UMBRELLA PROGRAMME🔥 16th NOVEMBER BATCH MOST SORTED CUSTOMISED PRELIMS PLAN: with All Levels for All Months | GS , Current Affairs & CSAT 1-1 MENTORSHIP☀️UNDER GUIDANCE BY THE FACULTY & SUGAM SIR. COURSE DETAILS : https://www.sunyaias.com/subscription-details/sambhav-2027 For query, Call us at: 9311470635 Or wh…

Showing the 12 most recent of 163 posts we hold for @sunyaias_CA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sunyaias_CA edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 21 posts on @sunyaias_CA as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz45 voters

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a) 1 and 2 only29%
  2. (b) 2 and 3 only36%
  3. (c) 1 and 3 only11%
  4. (d) 1, 2 and 324%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 07:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz154 voters

Q. Mayon Volcano, frequently in news for its violent eruptions, is situated in which of the following countries?

  1. (a) Indonesia31%
  2. (b) Japan15%
  3. (c) Philippines42%
  4. (d) Papua New Guinea12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz78 voters

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a) 1 and 2 only47%
  2. (b) 2 and 3 only29%
  3. (c) 1 and 3 only10%
  4. (d) 1, 2 and 313%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz122 voters

Q. Project 28A, recently in the news, is associated with which of the following?

  1. a) Construction of Next Generation Corvettes for the Indian Navy45%
  2. b) Development of nuclear-powered submarines34%
  3. c) Construction of aircraft carriers7%
  4. d) Development of next-generation fighter aircraft13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 09:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz235 voters

Q. The "Mekedatu Project", recently in the news, is a reservoir project across which river?

  1. a) Krishna River17%
  2. b) Godavari River17%
  3. c) Cauvery River55%
  4. d) Tungabhadra River10%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 13:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz155 voters

Q. The recently released Poverty and Equity Brief for India, which stated that India recorded one of the world's fastest rates of poverty reduction, was released by which institution?

  1. a) International Monetary Fund (IMF)17%
  2. b) World Bank47%
  3. c) Asian Development Bank (ADB)10%
  4. d) United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 163 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Antara_Sociology [AntaraSquad]
@antarachak · 27,422
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SAMADHAAN - Current Affairs - Prelims & Mains - Sunya IAS” (@sunyaias_CA), 12,774 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunyaias_CA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.