Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐄𝐑 𝐁𝐀𝐙𝐀

Channel

𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐄𝐑 𝐁𝐀𝐙𝐀

@super_baza_super

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

9,345subscribers

+4,575 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003305398403
TypeChannel
Username@super_baza_super
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/super_baza_super

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7709,3457,057.522 August 2026 β€” 4,770 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 5,321 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 6,030 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 6,878 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 6,947 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 7,409 subscribers10 September 2026 β€” 7,421 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 8,448 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 9,345 subscribers22 August 202618 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 28 days, net +4,575. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,084–10,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:379,345+897
14 Sept 2026, 03:598,448+1,027
10 Sept 2026, 11:197,421+12
5 Sept 2026, 02:017,409+462
1 Sept 2026, 03:136,947+69
29 Aug 2026, 03:266,878+848
26 Aug 2026, 04:226,030+709
23 Aug 2026, 12:185,321+551
22 Aug 2026, 00:314,770first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ₯°1118.3%
πŸ’˜1016.7%
πŸ€—813.3%
πŸ‘711.7%
❀610.0%
πŸ”₯610.0%
⚑58.33%
❀‍πŸ”₯46.67%
customΒ 545389697022769635223.33%
😍11.67%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC434 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/super_baza_super

πŸ€—2πŸ’˜1πŸ₯°1

21 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC436 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/super_baza_super

πŸ€—2⚑1❀1πŸ’˜1

21 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC433 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/super_baza_super

❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ’˜1πŸ€—1

21 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC420 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

https://t.me/super_baza_super

πŸ’˜1πŸ€—1πŸ₯°1

21 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC442 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Baxtimizga soğ boʻlinglar. Yangiliklar yaratishda charchamanglar.

πŸ‘1πŸ’˜1πŸ₯°1

21 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC441 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Mehnatilar rohat boΚ»lsin. Juda ham goΚ»zal, tayyor ish hujjatlari uchun yana bir bor rahmat.

❀2πŸ₯°2πŸ’˜1πŸ€—1

21 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC805 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ”₯2πŸ‘1πŸ₯°1customΒ 54538969702276963521

21 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC799 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀3πŸ‘1πŸ₯°1customΒ 54538969702276963521

21 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC787 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ₯°2⚑1πŸ‘1πŸ’˜1πŸ”₯1😍1

21 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC720 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚑1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1πŸ’˜1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

21 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC708 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚑1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1πŸ’˜1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

21 Aug 2026, 03:26 UTC600 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚑1❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1πŸ’˜1πŸ”₯1πŸ€—1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @super_baza_super. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ’π”ππ„π‘ 𝐁𝐀𝐙𝐀” (@super_baza_super), 9,345 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/super_baza_super.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.