Channel
@superexpotim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003000404536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @superexpotim |
| Description | Сценарист и музейщик осмысливает предметы и опредмечивает мысли, чтобы придать жизни максимально богатый и глубокий вкус. Ведущий эксперт Центра гуманитарных практик: @pogovorimocennostyah |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/superexpotim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 173 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 173 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
41 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 56.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#СуперЭкспонат Русский крестьянский быт хорошо знаком мне по сказкам, художественной и научной литературе. Так кажется, пока не делаешь очередное открытие. А сделать его можно только органами чувств, никак иначе. В фондах Государственного музея истории ГУЛАГа меня всегда удивлял половик раскулаченных крестьян Косяшкиных из архангельской деревни (1-е фото к посту). Я такие впервые увидел в начале нулевых в IKEA. Вот…
❤6🙏2👏1
#СуперЭкспонат Феминитив «поэтка» придумали не вчера, а в сер. XIX в., почти уже двести лет назад. Но он быстро ушел со сцены, т.к. стал использоваться в сатирическом ключе из-за переклички с «деткой», «кокеткой» и т.п. Зато «поэтесса», созвучная «принцессе», прижилась. Неприятие отдельных феминитивов, на самом деле, на первичном, эмоциональном уровне не связано с желанием защитить традиционные ценности или язык ка…
❤3🔥2🤓1😡1
По многочисленным просьбам мы продлеваем приём заявок в Киношколу ещё на три дня. Успейте присоединиться — карета превратится в тыкву в 01:00 5 августа. Ваш путь в кино начинается здесь и сейчас. #Киношкола #МирМузея #ФЦГП #ПобедилиВместе
❤1🔥1
#ЗримыйСимвол Просак – довольно массивный станок, на котором в старину плели веревки и канаты. Работа на нем требовала высочайшей концентрации. Иначе волосы, борода, рукав рубахи или пола кафтана могли закрутиться между нитями. В лучшем случае будет очень больно попавшему в просак и смешно со стороны: позу скрученная жертва неосторожности принимала довольно нелепую. Но скрутить могло и так, что кость ломалась. А вып…
❤4🔥2👍1
#СуперЭкспонат Футуризм как искусство грядущего мира высоких технологий и социального прогресса манифестировали в Италии в 1909. И пошло поехало по Европе. Поэты, писатели и художники с корнем рвали с академическими традициями и методом эмоционально-интеллектуального тыка искали формы, актуальные для новых, свободных от предрассудков людей. С чистого листа. По-детски. Но по-взрослому. Особенностью русской версии фу…
❤6😍3👏2
#СуперЭкспонат В пошлом посте на выставке «Дом 21» я, покружив по экспозиционной зоне «Двор» и попереживав, вошел в темный коридор с щелями света на противоположных концах. И тянуло в них протиснуться, и понятно было, что телу хода туда нет. Зато скучные нумерованные двери послушно распахивались и пропускали в квартиры-залы. В каждом свои художники-герои и неповторимое настроение. Но воздух везде один и тот же – тво…
❤3👍1🔥1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @superexpotim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки Булгакова” (@superexpotim), 173 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superexpotim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.