Photo, posted without a caption
😁2

Channel
@superiorwest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
397subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001638123166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @superiorwest |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/superiorwest |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 397 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 390 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 387 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 390 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 388 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 386 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 386 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 37 | 57.8% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 17.2% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2
فشلتونا لا انتم الي اخذتوا ثاركم ولا ثار الشايب ولا اي شي من زماطكم ولا اني كدرت انام ظليت ازامط بيكم كدام بني أمية واكول حيزلزلون السعودية ويضربون منشآت الخريص وبقيق تالي خيبتوا ظني نريد نشوفكم منا لنهاية السنة حتظلون على موقفكم ومتسلمون سلاحكم لو كالعادة ازامط وتالي ابيع القضية.
😁6
بعد ٨ دقايق ويخلص اليوم اكرم الكعبي ليهسا ما قصفت السعودية اريد انام شوكت ترد
😁2
كشفت "وول ستريت جورنال" عن مسودة إتفاق مدتها 60 يوماً بين طهران ومسقط لتنظيم الملاحة بمضيق هرمز؛ عبر مسار لدخول السفن تحت سيطرة إيران، وآخر للخروج بالمياه العُمانية، دون فرض رسوم.. وأكدت طهران حصرية التفاهم مع عُمان دون مفاوضات مع واشنطن. حيث أعلنت إيران وسلطنة عُمان التوصل إلى اتفاق بشأن الخصائص الجغرافية لمسارات الملاحة في مضيق هرمز، مع وجود بيان مشترك في مراحله النهائية، إلا أن طهران أكدت أن الاتفاق لا يعني إعادة …
لهذا نقول ان الحجاج كان على حق
💯3😁3
لعد ليش تحالفتوا وية امريكا لأسقاط صدام ؟ هذا على فرض ان صدام ما احتل دولة من دول الخليج
😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
السؤال الثاني: هل يفيد بذلك تمتلك إيران عامل الوقت وتستغله ضد الولايات المتحدة، وبما يُرجعها عن قرار الحرب لأسباب نقص الذخيرة أو عجز القوات الأمريكية عن الضغط والعقاب المؤثر على إيران مع قرب الانتخابات النصفية؟ والإجابة بإيجاز، في رأيي، أن الأمر ليس كذلك. وسأوضح قصدي باختصار. هناك عدة عوامل حيوية للحرب، وهي عوامل القوة والمعلومات والأرض (وقد أضفت لهم عامل التخطيط)، وهذه العوامل الأربعة إذا امتلكها بتفوق كبير أحد أطر…
❤1
في ظل ما يتردد بشأن نقص الذخائر الأمريكية وطلب ضابط بارز في فرع الاستخبارات بقيادة المنطقة الوسطى الأمريكية في رسالة إلى محللين عسكريين يطلب فيها أفكارًا إبداعية وغير تقليدية للضغط على إيران ومعاقبتها، وجدت سؤالين يراودان صناع القرار الدوليين والمراقبين، وهما: السؤال الأول: هل الولايات المتحدة ما زالت قادرة على تنفيذ مهامها العملياتية فيما يخص حماية إسرائيل ومواصلة الضغط العسكري على إيران؟ والإجابة في رأيي باختصار …
❤2💘1
خاف ناسين احب اذكركم
🤣7
السيفي مالتي الي حأقدمه لفرع جي بي مورغان بالعراق:
😁9
مجتمعنا ابو الاخلاق العالية :
😢3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @superiorwest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الغرب المتفوق” (@superiorwest), 397 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superiorwest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.