Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 13Kai

Channel

13Kai

@superkai13

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

30,455subscribers

+912 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314992048
TypeChannel
Username@superkai13
DescriptionДневник Реклама: TG: @alexbrand2024 Почта:[email protected] PR: @shipovskayam РКН : 7399837508
Created12 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/superkai13

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,45730,45529,9566 August 2026 — 29,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,539 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,543 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,538 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,528 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,526 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,565 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,641 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,678 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,660 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,655 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,647 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,654 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,647 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,635 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,626 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,623 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,618 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,601 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,592 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,591 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,565 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,563 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,551 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,520 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,540 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,490 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,495 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,507 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,492 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,471 subscribers19 September 2026 — 29,457 subscribers25 September 2026 — 30,057 subscribers4 October 2026 — 30,333 subscribers8 October 2026 — 30,298 subscribers12 October 2026 — 30,274 subscribers14 October 2026 — 30,304 subscribers15 October 2026 — 30,303 subscribers16 October 2026 — 30,287 subscribers17 October 2026 — 30,303 subscribers18 October 2026 — 30,455 subscribers6 August 202618 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 73 days, net +912. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,307–30,605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 16:4930,455+152
17 Oct 2026, 16:4630,303+16
16 Oct 2026, 13:3730,287-16
15 Oct 2026, 11:1730,303-1
14 Oct 2026, 10:1130,304+30
12 Oct 2026, 22:4130,274-24
8 Oct 2026, 14:3630,298-35
4 Oct 2026, 03:5730,333+276
25 Sept 2026, 13:2230,057+600
19 Sept 2026, 03:5829,457-14
16 Sept 2026, 17:5729,471-21
14 Sept 2026, 19:1629,492-15
13 Sept 2026, 06:2129,507+12
11 Sept 2026, 12:1729,495+5
8 Sept 2026, 21:1829,490-50
5 Sept 2026, 14:5629,540+20
3 Sept 2026, 15:3829,520-31
2 Sept 2026, 09:4329,551-12
1 Sept 2026, 10:3729,563-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:4529,565first reading

Engagement

174 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.3%
avg views ÷ 30,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,400
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
97
of 174 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held174 (19 July 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total1,397,880
Reactions total54,543
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 01:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
750
Videos
177
Links
153

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 02s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

88,462 reactions across 174 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤64,68373.1%
🤣7,3618.32%
🔥3,2953.72%
❤‍🔥2,1952.48%
⚡2,1722.46%
😁2,0332.30%
🏆1,8362.08%
😍1,7491.98%
👍7700.87%
💔5490.621%
🥰5150.582%
👏4170.471%
😢2380.269%
🤯2050.232%
💯1840.208%
🤔1050.119%
😈800.09%
🙏390.044%
🤩360.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 174 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88,462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2026, 18:54 UTC≈5,830 views214 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Forwarded from @sstefanisssPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤154❤‍🔥38🔥16🏆3🙏2🥰1

18 Oct 2026, 17:15 UTC≈7,670 views615 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Очень много теплых сообщений получаю после этой игры, рад что мы дарим вам такие невероятные эмоции, а вы всем сердцем переживаете за нас 🖤

❤502👏58😍43🏆8🥰4

18 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈9,060 views591 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Благодарен за все

❤471🔥62❤‍🔥37🙏12😍8😁1

18 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈9,390 views364 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

В оригинальной сказке Шарля Перро «Кот в сапогах» кот побеждал прежде всего Людоеда - могущественного волшебника, который жил в замке. Вчера прожили сказку, приключение кота в сопагах продолжаются

❤320🤣32🔥8🏆2🥰1😍1

17 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC≈11,400 views765 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Завтра начнем думать как выйти в финал, а пока кайфуем 🖤🖤🖤

❤637❤‍🔥71😍45🔥11🏆1

17 Oct 2026, 13:48 UTC≈12,100 views852 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Судейство протащило 🤣🤣🤣 Красная железная ✅ Пенальти железное ✅ Камбек года железный ✅

❤702😍79🏆55❤‍🔥9🤣4👍3

17 Oct 2026, 13:32 UTC≈12,100 views765 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

А чо так тихо стало?

❤633🔥78👍36🏆12😍4🥰2

17 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC≈12,000 views580 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

Камбек года, цените 2DROTS

❤465❤‍🔥70🔥39🏆6

17 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈12,500 views870 reactionsread 19 October 2026

Лучшая команда, лучшие трибуны , ебанутые эмоции А все кто не верил идите нахуй!!!

❤704❤‍🔥105🤯51🔥10

17 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC≈13,000 views525 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤422🏆57❤‍🔥39🔥4💯3

17 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC≈12,900 views441 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤353❤‍🔥44🏆40🔥4

17 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC≈7,100 views438 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Forwarded from @twodrotsshowVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤356👏43❤‍🔥35🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @superkai13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@superkai13 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“13Kai” (@superkai13), 30,455 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superkai13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.