Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Survive the Jive: All-feed

Channel

Survive the Jive: All-feed

@survivethejive

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,311subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001158762602
TypeChannel
Username@survivethejive
Created29 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/survivethejive

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,25914,70114,4806 August 2026 — 14,290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,289 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,283 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,261 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,259 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,701 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,697 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,689 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,684 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,678 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,672 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,673 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,671 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,663 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,667 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,654 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,646 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,635 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,628 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,625 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,619 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,606 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,599 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,592 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,578 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,555 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,540 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,533 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,534 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,527 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,515 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,502 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,455 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,440 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,428 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,414 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,408 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,405 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,400 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,392 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,386 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,380 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,378 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,377 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,379 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,382 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,387 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,374 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,364 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,360 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,354 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,341 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,342 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,334 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,328 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,322 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,311 subscribers14,3116 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,193–14,767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 21:1614,311-11
5 Nov 2026, 20:5614,322-6
4 Nov 2026, 20:4614,328-6
3 Nov 2026, 22:5914,334-8
2 Nov 2026, 20:4914,342+1
1 Nov 2026, 19:3914,341-13
31 Oct 2026, 22:3514,354-6
30 Oct 2026, 19:1814,360-4
29 Oct 2026, 16:5714,364-10
28 Oct 2026, 15:4914,374-13
27 Oct 2026, 17:4514,387+5
26 Oct 2026, 14:5014,382+3
25 Oct 2026, 15:0614,379+2
22 Oct 2026, 20:4214,377-1
21 Oct 2026, 13:5914,378-2
20 Oct 2026, 11:5814,380-6
19 Oct 2026, 14:1914,386-6
18 Oct 2026, 17:0714,392-8
17 Oct 2026, 19:1614,400-5
16 Oct 2026, 20:1814,405first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 14,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held92 (27 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total34,233
Reactions total1,162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 43s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,562 reactions across 92 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
⚡1,86433.5%
❤1,40825.3%
🔥5279.48%
👍3987.16%
💯2274.08%
🐳1492.68%
🗿1462.62%
🤯1212.18%
👏1142.05%
🤔881.58%
👻811.46%
🏆801.44%
🤷‍♂681.22%
👀611.10%
🤓480.863%
🫡420.755%
🙏370.665%
🥰340.611%
🤩300.539%
🎄150.27%
3 further kinds240.431%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 92 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @survivethejive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC454 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

McColl et al 2026 shows that a migration of North Germans related to the Anglo-Saxons INTO Denmark and Sweden occurred before the Viking Age. Fascinating that the English had more recent ties to the Danes and Swedes than just our Proto-Germanic roots. West Germanic ancestry was shared in the Migration and Vendel era and entered Scandinavia at the time the cult of Wotanaz was becoming more prominent among a new hyper…

⚡24❤2👻1

6 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC522 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Remarkable to consider. The tribes of the Migration Era that finally brought Rome to her knees and claimed her old colonies mainly came from this little area - and they also went North into Scandinavia and changed Germanic culture everywhere so that their god Woden became the main one even in the Viking Age. -The Langobards who took Italy in 568 AD came from Jutland. -The Saxons and Angles who took Britannia in 449…

⚡32❤4🤯3🤔2👍1👻1

5 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC883 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026

My article for WhyNow explains the potential pagan influences on the 5th November UK Bonfire night https://whynow.co.uk/read/bonfire-night-is-an-orgy-of-religious-hatred-older-than-we-think

⚡15🔥7

5 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC866 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Autumnal traditions: One of the maddest, most spectacular folk traditions of the British Isles is the annual burning of the tar barrels in Ottery St Mary in Devon. The chaps who lift the flaming barrels are called barrellers; they have to be local, born and bred, and they begin lifting running the tar barrels at the age of seven! https://youtu.be/qnXx6jvsQto

🔥19🤔2

5 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC828 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Spooky season continues. In a small village in Devon there is an ancient rite in which a huge boulder is turned over lest the devil be leashed upon the village https://youtu.be/taDQDq-pXqU

🔥20❤5🎉3

5 Nov 2026, 20:32 UTC789 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

The stone of Shebbear was successfully turned over this evening

❤25👍10🗿10⚡1

5 Nov 2026, 10:30 UTC986 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Next they claim the importance of the East Scandi cluster to the formation of Paleo-Germanic can be connected to the loans into Finnic between ca. 1000–500 BC. Since East Scandi cluster ancestry is in the zones where both Celtic and Finnic interactions occur - they conclude it was more important than South Scandi to the Paleo-Germanic language, which may be true. but here we are talking about an ancestry cluster that…

👍13⚡5❤3🤔2👀1

5 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC913 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

We also see one SGC man dated c. 2501 BC, NEO792 from Næs, Denmark has an I2a-L1229 haplogroup which comes from TBK men. And another Danish SGC man, NEO875 from Toftum bog, has a dead-end clade of I1, c. 2206 BC! Where did that I1 come from? Some SGC samples such as Cees from the Netherlands are, like the South Scandi cluster, rich in WHG ancestry. Is I1 from a local unsampled WHG population? Ostorf 3 was a man who…

👍9❤5👀1

5 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC882 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Here (see pic) they recognise the 'traditional' vector as the Single Grace Culture of the Jutland peninsula but say their East Scandi cluster must also be considered. They say all four I1a2a individuals older than 2800 BP sit in the East cluster. But these i1 samples aren't old enough to prove the relationship, as they are from after the first new stone gallery graves show up in SOUTH Sweden - and the I1 haplogroup …

👍9❤5🎉1👀1👻1

5 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC990 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

McColl 2024 is now published under the new title 'Tracing the spread of Germanic languages using ancient genomics'. I agree with McColl and his colleagues that identifying the root of Paleo-Germanic within the complex genetic landscape of late Neolithic Scandinavia, where three distinct Indo-European speaking groups lived, depends on finding out where I1 haplogroup came from. I commend their work which discovered t…

❤10💯5👀1

1 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,650 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @germanicpaganism

https://youtu.be/vcZyYgbdY9A?si=NtRkZ_om2I3tZ7Bs For anyone who hasn’t viewed it, go check out my collaboration with Survive the Jive.

⚡29👻4❤1🐳1🤔1🤷‍♂1

29 Oct 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,350 views84 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Reconstruction of a 2nd. century B.C. Gaulish banquet. (Artist: Ru-mor). The guests are accurately depicted sitting on the ground on wolf skins, in accordance with the description provided by Diodorus Siculus. ("Library of History", Book V).

🔥57👍15❤8⚡3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @survivethejive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

European Native Faiths
@EuroNativeFaiths · 249
4 posts
Antiquitas Telegrammatica
@architelegramma · 332
3 posts
Αρυολογία☀️ (The Indo-Europeans)
@Aryologia · 3,712
2 posts
Georg Immanuel Nagel
@GeorgImmanuelNagel · 78
2 posts
RadEthelWynn
@RadEthelWynn · 18
2 posts
ᚸ Order of the Sacred Mannerbunde ᚸ
@englishorder · 648
2 posts
Heathen carvings
@heathencarvings · 529
2 posts
Eichengeflüster
@oakwhispers · 556
2 posts
The True Northerner | Настоящий Северянин
@thetruenortherner · 2,816
2 posts
Ansuz Society
@AnsuzSociety · 302
1 post
COLE WOLFSSON
@ColeWolfsson · 4,607
1 post
CulturalExile
@CulturalExile14 · 64
1 post
Sagittarius Granorum
@EvolasCave · 673
1 post
Germanic Faith
@GermanicFaith · 1,410
1 post
Pan-European Paganist Movement (P.E.P.M)
@PEPM1618 · 16
1 post
The Rose of Mercia 🌹
@TheRoseofMercia · 446
1 post
Wuhlvs Wilds
@WuhlvsWilds · 9
1 post
Awenyddau
@awenydd · 201
1 post
𝙱𝚕𝚎𝚞𝚗ꪛ𝚎𝚗𝚗 🎶࿋ᛉ🪷
@bleunwenngram · 228
1 post
Die Herrschaft
@die_herrschaft_80 · 790
1 post
European Resistance
@europeanresistance · 179
1 post
Герметизм для ленивых и не очень
@faithandbeauty · 565
1 post
Frith & Folk
@frithandfolk · 597
1 post
Hammer and Vajra
@hammerandvajra · 3,435
1 post
Kolovrat and trinity
@kolovratandtrinity · 372
1 post
Meanwhile In Elysium
@meanwhileinelysium · 72
1 post
ODAL
@odal24 · 10,085
1 post
Sigmund's Metaphysical Männerbund 🜨
@sigmundsmannerbund · 1,387
1 post
Albion
@thealbionmovement · 71
1 post
A Wisdom of Owls
@thinhandcoven · 195
1 post
Tweed Supreme
@tweedsupreme · 262
1 post
Автохтонъ
@vagabondrus · 81
1 post
Will of Gaut
@willofgaut · 1,261
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,799
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Survive the Jive: All-feed” (@survivethejive), 14,311 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/survivethejive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.